Kids have grown to love sports over the years but many parents worry about their children’s scholarship. In many argument essays, people state that the entertainment kids are so fond over can have an effect on students graduation. Therefore, school sports should be removed because exercise activities take away the chance of students doing their school work, they cost too much, and not having these athletics will mean kids won't be distracted anymore. Many parents think their kids spend too much time focusing on sports than they do with their work. In 2012, 80 percent of the students in Premont Independent District passed their classes (Ripley 10). In the previous fall, according to Amanda Ripley, “only 50 percent of the kids passed
Amanda Ripley, the author of “The Case Against High-School Sports”, made many good points that can create much controversy when it comes to high-school sports, due to the cost and the academic problems it may be creating amongst the students. She interviewed many people who have experiences banning high-school in order to save money for their school district and the school itself. Ripley wants to bring into attention all the money that is used on high-school sports when districts tend to use a minimal amount on academics. I have come to an agreement with her point-of-views due to several reasons: sports are the main focus of any high-school that may have sports, the tax money being provided to the school district has been used on sports than
According to " The Case Against High-School Sports" (2013), sports could create some study, health, and time management problems for schools and students. In this post, Amanda Ripley initially shows the benefits when involving in the high-school sports: exercise, sportsmanship lessons, some positive personalities, more fun and staying away from vices. She also writes some tales to inform readers that in the US, students are interested and enjoy in sports more than other peers in other countries. However, she claims that the high-school sports have negative effects on schools and students. Next, she gave some schools ' examples to show the problems when schools and students spent too much time and money in high-school sports.
The debate of compensating student-athletes for their time, skill, and revenue brought in, has been growing in discussion over the recent years. College athletes have consistently brought in large quantities of profits for their schools and the NCAA and they don’t see a penny of that money. Northwestern football players sought to unionize in 2014 because, according to Ramogi Huma, the founder and current president of the National College Players Association (NCPA), which publicly puts pressure on the NCAA to expand the athletes’ rights and benefits, “The current model resembles a dictatorship, where the NCAA places these rules and regulations on these students without their input or without their negotiation.” (SI) In 2009, Ed O’Bannon filed
For many years has football has been considered the utmost dangerous sport in high school, but recently many new studies have been made to prove the exact opposite. High school football gives money to the school and improves the school. In high school sports when a team wins the championship the school gets money that can be used towards hiring new teachers, providing scholarships for students, buying new books, and overall improving the school itself. When a high school football team wins the championship the team's school gets $400,000 that can be spent on the school in many different forms.
This notion is supported by Dr. Daniel Gould, who believes that “Children who participate in sports have increased educational aspirations, closer ties to school and increased occupational aspirations in youth” (1). People against the funding of high school sports think that parents and society are placing more emphasis than ever before and, “[P]ressures athletic personnel to deviate on winning from the athlete- centered educational and personal development mission” (Gould 1). However, athletes strive to do better in class. Michael Lorenc, a high school basketball coach believes that “those who seem to have an overwhelming schedule where they’re playing maybe multiple sports, and high academic schedules, they tend to do better than those who don’t do anything extracurricularly” (Gray). Balancing sports and school makes athletes put more effort into keeping up grades while playing the sport they love.
In today’s world many parents are “worried” about the education that their children receive and they want school boards to do their jobs and help their children learn. But is it the school boards problem? No, a vast amount of schools in the USA go after the physical abilities that students have. Amanda Ripley’s, “The Case Against High School Sports,” makes points in which she states that the students here in the USA are more behind in their academics, but more ahead in their sport systems unlike any other country.
The National Collegiate Athletic Association is an organization that claims to be dedicated to the well-being and lifelong success of college athletes. The organization as a whole is dedicated to their mission. However lately there has been much concern over whether or not the NCAA is still able to provide the necessary leadership required, so that it may properly govern, and protect its members institutions. Some even claim that the NCAA is corrupt and cartel-based, given the lack regulation of the increasingly capitalistic operations as well as its exploitation of student-athletes. In the end though, as a non-profit institution, while it may not be utopian, the NCAA has worked tirelessly to prove that its monopoly is necessary for the achievement
Contact sports are the reason kids are getting hurt. Contact sports are good for kids. The Federal and state government should stop kids under 10 to stop playing contact sports because 45% of kids under 10 getting hurt are from contact sports and 5% of the time its ending that kids chances to play sports in the feature, Not to mention contact sports can also make kids go to their fullest and being burned out and although contact provide some kids will useful tools in life most of the time there is more negative than positive.
The stress can get so intense, it feels paralyzing. That’s why it is important than ever for schools to invest in their athletic programs,” states the sports article “Should Schools get rid of Sports.” Schools should keep their sports programs because they help improve academics, help improve mental and emotional health, and improves social skills like being on a team. Schools should not get rid of their sports programs because they help with student’s academics.
Frances is a field hockey player for her school team. One day, she got her report card and saw she got a C+ in Spanish. The next day at practice, her coach told her she was off the team--Even though Frances had been trying her best in Spanish. Frances thought this was unfair and ceased putting effort into Spanish. This is an example of how a child could be negatively by the No Pass, No Play rule.
For many years, people have debated whether or not school sports are good for children. Many people have stated, that after their students have been removed from sports, they have had an increase of some kind in their grades. Therefore, schools should eliminate sporting activities to save money, give the United States a better title, and help students boost their grades in class. Because of how the country is with money, it is a very substantial thing for schools, so taking sports out of their system will help provide their students with more academically pleasing activities.
Carsen Rhodes Mrs. Matt American Literature 29 March 2023 The Intensity of Youth Athletics There has been a lot of controversy about youth sports and whether they are too intense for children to play. While there are many reasons to believe that children this young should not spend their whole childhood sacrificing for sports, there is something about sports keeping kids involved. Throughout the years 2012 to 2020, there was a minor decrease in participation levels in sports for ages 13 through 17. Even if there was only a 7% decrease in males and 2% in females, that is a lot of kids quitting compared to how many children in the world participate in youth sports(“Studies Find Indulging in Sports Is Good for Boys”).
In this day and age with professional athletes being at the top of the social spectrum, youth sports have gotten very popular. “More than 26 million children ages 6 to 17 played team sports in 2014(Rosenwald).” Youth sports are very popular because it brings the great feeling of being on a team. When you are on a team you feel like you can do anything together, and nothing is stopping you. There are also many flaws in youth sports.
School administrators have been debating whether to keep, or end after school athletics. Due to sport suspension, more students have successful grades. Therefore, schools should suspend sports in order for students to improve grades, to reduce costs, and adjust American academics. As educators know, students should focus on schoolwork instead of sports to improve their grades. For example, in the fall of 2012, Premont Independent School District had 80 percent of students pass their classes compared to 50 percent the previous semester (Ripley 10).
I have playoffs until December 19. I don’t know what time my games are and where yet. Coaches choices the crew and the reserve official the week of their game doing the playoffs. I am pretty sure I will be chosen. So it makes it hard for Thursday, Friday and Saturdays.