Scientific Method Essay

As time went from the 16th century to the 18th century, the Renaissance thinking transformed to the Scientific Revolution. Soon, it would enable a worldview in which people were not invoking the principles of religion as often as the Renaissance. As an example, these natural philosophers, known as scientists today, developed a new thinking in which the world was no longer geocentric. The thought of an Earth-centered universe as the Bible would say, transformed as heliocentric or in other words Sun-centered. Within this period, Scientists were starting to understand the world’s functions, for they created experiment methods incorporating discipline, mathematics, and the essential Scientist communication.

The Discourse on Method exhorted the reader to doubt everything. It advised him to take as false what was probable, to take as probable what was called certain, and to reject all else. The free-thinker should believe that it is was possible to know everything and should relinquish doubt only on proof. The senses were to be doubted initially, because they were also the source of hallucination; even mathematics might be doubted, since God might make a man believe that 2 and 2 made 5. With this book, Descartes revolutionized the form of scientific arguments.

The cycle goes on until the hypothesis aligns with the results. Rationalism kicks in the first step of the scientific method all the way to the third which is the forming of a hypothesis. Empiricism might also start with observation but it is applied strongly during experiments because of the experience you get from

The issue on whether religion and science can work together has been debatable for centuries. Neil DeGrasse Tyson in his article the Perimeter of Ignorance argues that science and religion cannot coexist. In his article, the author explains that religion is all about the Bible and the Bible primarily focuses on the explanation of the origin of the world. He puts forth the point that this concept is far different from what science is and that they do not complement each other. This essay intends to prove that religion and science can work together with no issues.

In Steven Shapin’s book, The Scientific Revolution, he described the massive scientific changes that occurred from the late 16th to the early 18th centuries. Shapin utilizes the scientists and their findings to demonstrate the changes that affected Western civilization. He describes his theory of the Scientific Revolution as he proves that the world has always had scientific advances. Steven Shapin states his thesis which influenced the modern world, that the Scientific Revolution did not happen during a single time period through the use of the three essential questions: What was known, How was it known, and What was the Knowledge for.

Humans have often wondered how the universe developed into what it is today. For centuries, it has induced religious and scientific discussions and debates, leading famous scientists to trying to discover the enigma which the development of the universe is. One of the most accepted model to represent the evolution of the universe is the big bang theory. “It is an attempt to explain how the universe developed from a very tiny, dense state into what it is today” (Strickland, 2008).

The scientific method is paramount to scientists and their studies. Barry affirms, “Ultimately a scientist

Last but not least, science is characterized by its incessant evolution in a way that a single new anomaly can easily falsify a strong scientific theory. In simple English, even experts know that there is no ultimate certainty to

That’s where science was at 400 years ago. Where was science at 2000 years ago? I’m not sure it’s safe to say that what’s written in the bible should be taken with absolute scientific

there is less perfection in works composed of several pieces and made by the hand of diverse masters than in those at which one alone has worked” (2, 1). Going back to the work of scientists—their work may be less perfect simply because they often work in teams, or they just build off of what is already known. The work they compose would be far more beneficial and valid if it were simply their own unique thoughts and discoveries that

(Hunt, 610) The Scientific method refers to the investigation and the methodology of nature. The ancient, medieval and Arab texts that were commented on by humanists were mathematical and scientific treatises. The appraisal of these treatises

1. The scientific method is made up of four steps. The first step is Observation where someone notices something that is going on. The second step is Hypothesis where a statement is then made to try and explain why the thing that was observed is happening. This hypothesis must be testable and falsifiable.

For centuries, questions and mysterious that surrounded the origins of human and creatures had been explained through religion and beliefs. It was until the mid-1800s, when the ideas of an English naturalist and geologist, Charles Darwin made a breakthrough in the history of science, which will forever change and expand our understanding of the world, its inhabitants, and the human race. Darwin’s theory of evolution based on natural selection soon advocated the scientific approach of explaining the many species that live today, but most importantly, his discovery showed us how we and all the other living things interact and share some connection. The documentary series, Beyond Genesis: Origin of Species by Charles Darwin presented the scientific journey Charles Darwin began in which his ideas brought new knowledge and understanding mankind and the purpose we hold in our universe.

There are 6 steps of the scientific method which are used in order to understand and answer a question. The first step of the scientific method asks a question you do this so you have a problem to solve because you can't just do an experiment while using the scientific method. The second step of the scientific method does background research you do this so you know more information about the question or problem you are trying to solve or answer. The third step is to construct a hypothesis this is when you make a guess of what the result will be. The fourth step is to test your hypothesis by doing an experiment this is when you can see the variables such as controlled, dependent, and independent variables.

Neo-Humanism often goes in tandem with an evolutionist view on the past which implies that we have "progressed" beyond the enigmas and constrictions which blinded our ancestry, but are senseless to our posterity. Overwhelmed by a fragmentary, materialistic and quantitative outlook hypermodern science is set back by its epistemological base. The superficial "impersonality" and "objectivity" of modern science should not mislead us to the conclusion that it is and must be anthropomorphic in its axioms. Regardless of the fact that how inhuman it defines both man and the universe it comes true that the criteria and instruments which designate this science are purely human-induced and it is the human knowledge and the human mindsets which decide modern science. As long as education attempts to guide human beings to some aspired goals, it requires to be