Should College Athletes Be Unionized

Colleges generate billions off of players, therefore it should not hurt to compensate student athletes, furthermore, these players are risking their health and well-being without receiving a penny in return, and lastly, getting paid to play can teach these young student athletes financial responsibility. To begin with, colleges generate billions off of players, therefore, it should not hurt to indemnify their student athletes. Paying each athlete even at minimum wage is better than nothing, in addition, it would not even make a dent in the billions the colleges produce because of the players. All jersey sales, ticket sales, television revenue, and basically all outlets of income get dispersed to the coaches, the staff, the schools, the NCAA and any and everyone involved

The debate of whether not college athletes should be paid has been going on for a couple decades now. With college institutions gaining revenue from football bowl games and March Madness in basketball, Dr. Dennis Johnson thinks that “There now is a clamoring for compensating both football and basketball players beyond that of an athletic scholarship” (2012). On the other hand, Dr. John Acquaviva is satisfied with the current college system in which colleges provide athletic scholarships which reward a free college education in return for representing the university’s athletic program (2012). Dr. Johnson then follows up Dr. Aquaviva’s claim with his five selling points for the paying of college athletes and Dr. Aquaviva provides five points

Cooper quotes Robert McCormick, an attorney for the National Labor Relations Board under President Jimmy Carter, when he says “These young men are laboring under very strict and arduous conditions, so they really are laborers in terms of the physical demands on them while they're also trying to go to school and being required to go to school” (Cooper). Cooper later states “Common law has three tests: the right of others to control a person's activities, whether that person is compensated and if that person is economically dependent on that compensation” (Cooper). In the next paragraph, Cooper tells how the players fit into all three categories. Cooper states, “The law professors find that college athletes meet

College Athletes Should Be Getting Paid College athletics are a major deal to fans all over the United States. Something about people cheering on their former college or their favorite university can really bring out the fan in everyone. Some states do not have professional sports teams so cheering on college teams is the closest thing they have to the professional sports team experience. This brings up the topic of college athletes getting paid to play the sports they love. The idea of college athletes getting paid is a largely debated topic amongst people from all over the country.

The NCCA has collected over 6 billion dollars in 2012 (U.S News). In many cases people would say the NCAA would go nowhere without the athletes, and that is correct. The issue is people think players should be compensated. These are students that have to go to class everyday. The purpose of college is education not athletics.

Ryan Vanderfords’ article published in the Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal explores this issue of whether or not college athletes should be paid beyond what they receive in scholarships. Vanderford is currently a law associate at a law firm in Los Angeles, California. He played sports throughout high school and college, so the author can relate to this topic. The payment of college athletes has become a more prominent issue in today’s society then it has been in the past. He argues that at major universities, student athletes help the school generate their revenue and therefore should be paid.

Jack Evans S. Blount Assignment 4 - Argumentative Research Paper – Final Draft May 4, 2023 Should college athletes be paid? American intercollegiate athletics are deeply engrained into the college culture and are beloved by students and spectators alike. Collegiate national championships are just a few examples of athletic events that draw in thousands of spectators, millions of televised viewers and over a billion dollars annually for universities across the country. The business of collegiate athletics is enormous.

College Athletes: Should They Get Paid? The controversial debate on whether or not collegiate athletes should be able to profit from their name, image, and likeness has been going on for as long as the brain can think. Each year, year-round, college athletics generate tens of thousands of dollars for their respective institutions, only for athletes to see none of that money. It is believed by many that the scholarships athletes receive is enough to compensate, along with the presented argument that allowing college athletes to make money makes college athletics political and takes away from integrity of the business. To oppose, not all sports give athletic scholarships, and even when they do, it still isn’t enough to compensate for an athletes’

Collegiate sports produce a lot of money from the students who play for them. These students only and for that reason College athletes should be paid outside of scholarships because the college sports industry makes a large amount of money, and these athletes invest a lot of time and risk into their sport, along with the fact that if athletes were paid they could afford their education. Athletes should be able to make money from the sport they play because with the amount of hours they put in there isn’t for them to do school work and have a job .Colleges profit about $27 billion dollars or more annually from their athletics (Article name). In the past twelve years the amount of attention and money generated by football and basketball has

College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.

It includes only those funds that end up in the NCAA 's bank account.” The FCAA being the organization that would collect and distribute the capital. This research paper described why college athletes should be paid. They make personal sacrifices, and take risks in order to produce revenue for their schools.

If colleges began to pay their athletes, then they could build a bad reputation for being mercenary and lose their educational reputation If they are allowed to play, then it can be financially detrimental to the college because there are many flaws in the system. College athletes should not be compensated for their actions regarding athletic activities, no matter what sport or level they compete on. The idea that college athletes should or shouldn 't be paid

As we all know, college can be very expensive. With the scholarships and grants, college student-athletes can go to school for free and get their day-to-day needs such as food, housing, clothes, etc. Ackerman and Scotts, purpose is to show that college is a learning experience and with the help of college sports, the student-athletes will have a chance to grow and be successful in life rather than being exploited. However, critics believe that college student-athletes should be paid salary, like professional athletes, because they want people to see the “athletes are the rule, not the expectation” (par 11). They want the audience to think that it’s a rule for student-athletes to go play pro after two years, will no expectation.

Mike says”Students all over the world work hard at the sport that true love and don’t get a lot in return for it”. While college athletes may not exactly be employees, they are more than just students. Consider the life of a student-athlete, though. The average Division I football player dedicates over 43hours per week to his sport, meaning that he spends more than a typical American work-week training and playing football, in addition to his class work. Their work, which generates exorbitant amounts of money year in and year out, deserves Compensation.

Are they students or employees? They spend more time with the sport than in school. Student athletes should be acknowledged for their performances. College athletes should be paid to play because they bring money into the school, advertisement, and they perform the same tasks of pros. College kids bring in thousands of dollars every game day.