Similarities Between Super Pacs And 501c4s

The Koch brothers represent a symbol of a greater problem of what the power of money in politics can accomplish. Some wealthy and large-scale corporations have the ability to indirectly express control in ways that manipulate and overwhelm the resolve of the people. The Kochs’ influences on major events are becoming more and more evident to society. Thier costly campaign to strike down science reflects what our country is becoming more conscious of-- affluent ideologies in the top 1% can impose substantial influence on our lives, whether through policy or advertising. The Kochs have millions of dollars to influence

The Seminole Tribe sued the state of Florida, arguing that the state's actions violated the IGRA and their tribal sovereignty. The case ultimately reached the US Supreme Court, which ruled in favor of the Seminole Tribe in a 6-3 decision.

The court case discusses rather or not an Indian tribe can have a gambling casino outside of

Nevertheless, while federal law dictates that political advertisers must file a disclosure report if contributions exceed $10,000, donors can easily maintain their identities nonetheless. Furthermore, donors can now easily transfer money through “intermediary nonprofits”, otherwise known as super PACs (Murray Digby Marziani 2-3). In 2010 and 2012, “70-80% of super PAC finances directly supported or opposed federal candidates, and in 2012, super PACs spent a total of $620.9 million supporting or opposing House, Senate, and presidential candidates (United States Cong. Congressional Research Service 1-3). As a result, individuals have been left unaware of the influences corporations and other groups have had on federal

The act established that companies could not use treasury money to support or dissent someone’s political campaign, and the case decided whether are not this law was against the first and fourteenth amendment . The outcome of the case decided that this law was in fact not against the first or fourteenth amendment because companies could not be regarding as people and therefore did not reserve the same kinds of rights and liberties, such as freedom of speech or equal protection under the law . In the case of McConnell v. Federal Election Committee, the BCRA of 2002 was brought into question and whether or not Congress had the right to limit companies spending of money towards political campaigns, even if it was considered to be soft money and

The Purpose of Interest Groups Interest groups are associations whose purpose is to influence political officials to support

FEC (2010) has left an indelible mark on the landscape of campaign finance regulations and the boundaries of political speech in the United States. The logical framework and reasoning employed in the case have been subject to intense scrutiny and debate. While the majority opinion asserts that corporations and unions possess free speech rights, limitations on their spending infringe upon those rights, and independent expenditures do not lead to corruption, critics raise valid concerns about the potential for undue influence, the erosion of political equality, and the corruption of the democratic process. Work Cited United v. Federal Election Commission, 558 U.S. 310 (2010). Balkin, J. M., & Levinson, S. (2010).

Super PACs are kind of political action committee that are funded by unions, corporations, and individuals. They are allowed to raise unlimited sums of money, then spend that money discretely for, or against a campaign(“super PACs”). The result of two supreme court rulings, Citizens United v. Federal Electoral Commision, and Speechnow.org v. Federal Election Commision, said that the afore mentioned groups could not be kept from donating any amount for Super PACs. PACs are not allowed to communicate and plan their spending in accordance with a campaign, although this is nearly impossible to uphold.

According to (APUS, n.d) there are approximately 12,000 lobbyists registered with the federal government and they are guided by the Honest Leadership and

Do you feel insignificant during elections? Do you worry that there is too much money in politics? Do you believe that campaigns are corrupt? All these common worries become real issues in 2010 with Citizens United v. FEC: a Supreme Court ruling that will forever be significant to elections. The Citizens United ruling "opened the door" for unrestricted campaign spending by corporations, but most importantly the case led to the formation of groups called super PACs: corporations or labor unions that have the ability to use its general treasury and unlimited donations to influence elections.

An interest group is a group of people that tries to take action on a political issue or concern. The goal of an interest group is to recruit politicians as endorsements and persuade the government to take action on their respective issue. There are interest groups for mostly every issue or concern for the country. For example, the National Rifle Association and Brady Campaign are both interest groups that are concerned with gun control and gun violence. Both groups have stated their interests in influencing the American government to apply stricter gun laws and reduce the amount of shootings and deaths by firearms by a drastic margin.

One example of an interest group is AARP. AARP is a United States interest group with membership. It was founded in 1958 by Ethel Percy Andrus, Ph.D. And Leonard Davis. AARP has vast membership so it is able to generate its own income without being dependent on government grants or private donors. I read on Tuesday night on Facebook how disappointed they were in the Senate 's vote to proceed on the new healthcare bill and how they would inform 38 million members how their Senators voted so they could hold them accountable.

Campaign finance reform has been a hot button issue these past few decades in the United States. What makes it different from other issues? James L. Buckley says that “What distinguishes the campaign finance issue from just about every other one being debated these days is that the two sides do not divide along conventional liberal/ conservative lines.” In the Supreme Court case, Citizens United v. FEC, campaign finance reform lessened slightly.

Because interest groups are protected by the First Amendment, they cannot be outlawed. However, their activities--particularly lobbying and making financial contributions--can be regulated. The 1973 Lobby Regulation Act, amended in 1983, is much more effective than two earlier attempts at regulating interest groups, one in 1907 and the other in 1957. In spite of its more stringent provisions, the total number of persons lobbying is much higher than the fifteen hundred groups and persons who annually register. The rise of bureaucracy requires interest groups to influence key points in government.

1. They are important source of information. A member who is part of congress has to evolve themselves with many policy areas. But a lobbyists can confine themselves to one area and can by providing specialized expertise. If the information is powerful, then the lobbyist can be an allies. 2.