Summary Of Kathleen Ernst's Essay 'Breaking Tradition'

Primary Source Analysis This paper will contain an analysis on two documents that I have chosen on Women’s Rights. The two documents are: Abigail and John Adams Converse on Women’s Rights, 1776 and the National Organization for Women (N.O.W.) Statement of Purpose, 1966. Both were created hundreds of years apart, but they will give an understanding of how long of a fight it was for women to obtain a sense of equality.

Women’s ongoing fight for equality from the 1920s to the 1970s was reflected through their attire. The 1920s were marked by the shockingly short hemlines and their right to vote. While women struggled to get fair pay in the 1930s, they got hired more often than men, which gave them greater independence. However, due to the gloom of the Great Depression, women lost their confidence and their clothing became more conservative. By contrast, the 1940s provided greater opportunities as the United States went to war.

Women in the 1800’s Women had no rights in the 1800’s and were put through abuse, violence and rape. Servant women were frequently raped in their master’s house. There was major inequality with men and women and there were very heavy gender roles set that made it almost impossible for these women to escape these homes. Professor Chloe W. Smith, and author Jone J. Lewis, talk about these struggles and how some women tried to combat the struggles. The life of a woman throughout the 1800’s was challenging because of domestic abuse and rape at their workplace, and home and the inequality issues with men and women in society.

The value of origin is that the article was written by a well-educated author, who has knowledge about the civil war. The value of purpose of this article is to mainly enlighten historians on the aim of feminism before and during the civil war. Regardless of being slightly irrelevant to my investigation, the article gives me a strong understanding of what characteristics women had to have in order to fulfill the requirements of becoming a spy. The value of content of this article is that it is about how a couple years before the civil war started, they held the Seneca Falls Convention emphasizing on the relevance of women in that time period. Whilst the civil war, many feminists rose to take a part in the war, some became enlightened nurses, others became spies, and a few became social activists speaking on behalf of the colored people.

The author’s reasonings for writing in such a way can only be seen while using three perspectives, Marxist, new historicist criticism, and 2nd wave feminism. When relating the text to social class, you realize that during the 1920s, income inequality was at a historic high.

Hundreds of thousands of men risked their lives in the Civil War, but history tends to leave out all the women who went against what society believed and courageously contributed their efforts to the fight. American women witnessed their fathers, husbands, and brothers go off to fight in the Civil War, which lasted from 1861 to 1865. These women held the choice to watch the battles and all the action from their homes or to stand up for their beliefs and find a way to help. Their contribution, whether it be on the battlefront or along the sidelines, forced American society to rethink the stereotypical submissiveness of the traditional housewife and served as a push in the ongoing struggle for gender equality. As a whole, women found many ways to contribute a great deal

Thus, it is necessary to conclude that women have always played an important role in the development of history. History that involves women has been developed throughout the centuries, constantly changing its goals and forms, increasing the popularity movement of the American women in the late 1800’s. Women were discriminated for many things for a very long time, it wasn’t until the late 1800’s that women actually started to gain very few rights. The late 1800’s is very important time for women as it gets the movement started for Women’s Suffrage, and ultimately the late 1800’s starts to open the way for equality for women and

Women in the 1600s to the 1800s were very harshly treated. They were seen as objects rather than people. They were stay-at-home women because people didn’t trust them to hold jobs. They were seen as little or weak. Women living in this time period had to have their fathers choose their husbands.

For the 19th century America, the two sexes were to be separated into distinct spheres, the man’s public sphere and the woman’s private one. It was most common for the two sexes to spend their time mostly in the company of their own sex, and advices were given to the younger members of the society on the proper way of behaving according to one’s sex. Even though both sexes had to be instructed on how to perform in each other’s company, it was the shaping of a woman that needed to undergo through a series of instructions on the proper way to be a woman. A woman had to follow the rules of the Cult of True Womanhood to be considered proper and wife material. Fanny Fern in her writing appeals on and discusses the attributes of piety, purity, submissiveness,

In this paper I will be going over issue 17, “Has the Women’s Movement of the 1970’s Failed to Liberate American Women?”. Sara M. Evans and F. Carolyn Graglia each voice their opinions about the issue. They talk about the history of the women’s movement throughout time and the effects it had in our country. F. Carolyn Graglia writes about how she agrees the movement has failed to liberate American women. Her views on feminism concluded that the feminist movement of the 1960’s and 1970’s was a reasonable but a faulty idea, in that it was based on a worthy opinion (that all men and women should be equal).

A Woman’s Journey Through Misogyny In the late 1800s and early 1900s, the stereotypical roles of women were to tend to the house and to their children. They had little to no freedoms, and their husbands controlled practically every aspect of their lives. These stereotypes created a patriarchal society where men were superior to women. This was the social standard of the time period, but this would not be the case for long.

, this quote gives an example of just how much dominance the men had. Girls acquired how to act from their mother. The women were strictly in charge of cleaning the house and being the spiritual leaders of the house. It was their responsibility to see that their family attended church every week. The women were involuntary subordinate to the men of that day.

Having thoroughly analyzed the ways in which the Civil War profoundly altered concepts of womanhood and domesticity, the same method must be undertaken in examining these changing concepts within the South as well. Within his article entitled “Altars of Sacrifice: Confederate Women and the Narratives of War,” Drew Gilpin Faust emphasizes the importance of the Civil War as it stood out among other wars for “the place of women in that conflict stimulated especially significant examination and discussion of women’s appropriate relationship to war – and thus to society in general.” Moreover, he further stresses that while both the North and South were greatly dependent on the female population, the South seems to have relied on female participation

Throughout history women have been a lower class due to their sex. But not all woman is. Some females are stronger than the mean in their colonies, tribe, etc. Strength does not necessarily mean just big physical muscles, but mentally too. They are devoted a willing to do anything they set their mind too.

Throughout the eighteenth century, social class was an ever ruling concept. A person’s social class determined everything about them—their fate was uncompromising. In order to maintain a high social class, families refused to marry their daughters to anyone of lower standing. They put a lot of effort into finding a suitor who