minimum of 640 acres of land and one share of oil. With the discovery of oil on the land this meant each Osage was entitled to and would receive royalty payments for the oil (Gross). The discovery of oil and the royalty payments that came along with it were going to introduce the Osage to a whole new world, a world of wealth. In Christopher Klein’s historical article “The FBI’s First Big Case: The Osage Murders”, he describes for us in detail the wealth the Osage people received. Klein says “Each member of the Osage tribe received quarterly royalty payments, and as the years progressed, so did the number of digits on their check, growing into the hundreds and then the thousands of dollars. In 1923 alone, the 2,000 tribe members collectively …show more content…
Some tribal members worried this wealth was going to cause problems, and they certainly were not wrong. It was only a matter of time before outsiders started to form their own opinions on the Osage. They became jealous of the abundance of money they knew these “savages” were acquiring. Many white people who worked as personal servants to the Osage started to become envious of the money they saw their bosses for freely spending. In David Grann’s book “Killer of the Flower Moon”, he shares a quote taken from the New York Weekly Outlook during the years of the Osage wealth that states “The Indian, instead of starving to death…enjoys a steady income that turns bankers green with envy” (Grann, Killer of the Flower Moon 6). This statement shows the relation between Native American’s having the right to natural resources and wealth and the jealousy that is felt by outside people. The kind of jealousy that often leads to mistreatment. This statement from the New York Weekly Outlook was the first of many envious as well as prejudice comments that were aimed toward the Osage people at the …show more content…
Information from Klein’s article shows how the good fortune of the Osage people quickly turned to bad when outsiders became envious of their wealth. People outside of the tribe wanted to obtain the headrights that were responsible for making the Osage people wealthy. Desperate measures were taken by outsiders to find a way in and obtain these headrights. The Osage wealth lured desperadoes, bootleggers, and criminals to their land. These people were fueled by jealousy and greed and would stop at nothing to gain the headrights and wealth of the Osage people. The United States did not know how to handle the wealth of the Osage either. Congress held hearings concerning the Osage people and what they should do to “control” their wealth. Lawmakers appointed a white man to each full-blooded Osage. These white-men served as “guardians” to the Osage people’s headrights, monitoring and approving the money they spent but also manipulating and stealing from them along the way. The appointment of these guardians was the United States way or attempting to control something that was not theirs to control. It took away the Osage people’s full rights to their own money, and for what solid reason? None. The Osage people were struggling to hold onto their rights of their own land and natural resources. Although the tribe legally had rights to their oil shares white people still
One thing that I find very interesting is that the Osage were afraid of the Louisiana Purchase. This purchase caused problems, because of doubling the size of the United States.
So, the white men were fine with letting the Cherokees stay where they were UNTIL they heard there was a whole lot of gold on it, then the white men wanted the land. John Ross was committed to keeping the Cherokee land away from white men because he loved the land and Cherokee Indians a lot. He had even turned down 200,000 dollars that the white men were going to give him for the land. But, eventually, in the year 1830, things got really bad, the US Gov’t passed the Indian Removal Act and in Georgia the white men held a lottery to give away the Indians’ land. John Ross tried to use diplomacy to have the Cherokee’s rights to the land recognized.
In 1742 the chief of Onondaga of the Iroquois Confederacy knew that his land that the people shared would become more valuable than it has ever been. (Doc B)The reason for this was because the “white people” also known as the Americans wanted the land of the chief. The feelings of the Chief result in complaining to the representatives of Pennsylvania, Maryland and Virginia,
The 1854 Kansas-Nebraska Act was an act, which allowed new territories to decide if they were a free or slave state by popular sovereignty (Civilwar.org, Kansas-Nebraska Act). Kansas-Nebraska Act negated the Missouri Compromise. Missouri Compromise was an effort by the congress to diffuse the political rivalries triggered by the request of Missouri in 1819 for admission as a state in which supported slavery (Garraty and Foner). This was done to restore the balance of slave and free states at the time. Kansas-Nebraska Act violated the compromise that was made in the Missouri Compromise, it reignited the disagreement between the anti and pro-slavery factions, which lead to violent events.
Bridgette Adesuwa Omon Olumhense DBQ #2 The time period between 1789 and the mid 1830’s was quite ambiguous. With the British gone and the United States now in her building stages, an attiude needed to be taken towards the Native Americans, specifically the Cherokee Indians. The administrations before Jackson treated the Cherokee Indians with a somewhat docile, amiable hand, however much was left to be desired on the side of the United States. Many did not want to share the newly freed land with those that were not their own. Underneath the façade of friendship was manipulation, guarded ethnocentrism and racism.
In some ways, the dishonesty and trickery used by the Penns in order to gain more land seem worse than the more blatant tactics used to dispossess Native Americans in other parts of the country, because the Penns were taking advantage of the fact that the Delawares had come to expect a certain level of fair treatment and honesty from
The Indian Removal Act was signed in 1830 by President Andrew Jackson to remove the Cherokee Indians from their homes and force them to settle west of the Mississippi River. The act was passed in hopes to gain agrarian land that would replenish the cotton industry which had plummeted after the Panic of 1819. Andrew Jackson believed that effectively forcing the Cherokees to become more civilized and to christianize them would be beneficial to them. Therefore, he thought the journey westward was necessary. In late 1838, the Cherokees were removed from their homes and forced into a brutal journey westward in the bitter cold.
The United States gave the Indians time to move west and those that had not done so by choice were forced. The removal of the Indians was a long going issue for The United States, that no one knew just how to deal with. “Some officials in the early years of the American republic, such as President George Washington, believed that the best way to solve this “Indian problem” was simply to “civilize” the Native
In the article “The Hunger for Indian Land in Andrew Jackson’s America” written by Anthony F. C. Wallace, the treatment of Indian tribes and land in the Jacksonian Era is discussed. This purpose of the article is to explain the reason for Indian removal that occurred under Andrew Jackson’s presidency. The thesis of this article is that Americans kicked the natives off of their land to expand America's cotton industry. In Wallace’s first point he explains Andrew Jackson's reasons for removing the Indians from their lands were for his personal interest rather than for the good of the people.
In 1877, the assimilation of the Osage resulted in a ration system that resulted in the starvation of many tribe members. In 1877, the commissioner for Indian Affairs refused to speak with the Osage tribe leader about the ration system and its subsequent effects. In 1906, the Osage Allotment Act prevented future Osage Native Americans from legally joining the tribe and receiving a headright. In 1921, the first recorded murder for an Osage headright was committed against Charles Whitehorn. It wasn’t until 1925 that the murders were investigated, despite pleas from the Osage for help and intervention.
Precisely right! Then came gold - and we all know what greed can to do a civilization! The second largest gold rush in the United States (and first largest for Georgia) came with the discovery of gold in 1829, found near what is known today as Lumpkin County. This period would be referred to as the “Georgia Gold Rush.” News spread like wildfire and almost immediately white man moved in to take charge of land occupied by the Cherokee.
The removal of the Cherokee, or more commonly known as the “Trail of Tears,” was a defining American event that left an incredible historical impact. The Cherokee and other Native American tribes were being moved westward by the American government for various reasons such as disputes with white settlers, the desire for the gold on the Cherokee lands, the desire to civilize them and other reasons. However, it was far from a simplistic dispute between whites and Native Americans. There were many whites, including President Jackson, as well as some Cherokee, who supported the policy to move the Indians west. Opponents of the removal also included both whites and Cherokee.
During the “Gilded Age” period of American history, development of the Trans-Mississippi west was crucial to fulfilling the American dream of manifest destiny and creating an identity which was distinctly American. Since the west is often associated with rugged pioneers and frontiersmen, there is an overarching idea of hardy American individualism. However, although these settlers were brave and helped to make America into what it is today, they heavily relied on federal support. It would not have been possible for white Americans to settle the Trans-Mississippi west without the US government removing Native Americans from their lands and placing them on reservations, offering land grants and incentives for people to move out west, and the
Oklahoma is home to many Native American tribes that once flourished throughout the country and still have an important presence and history in our state. Of the many tribes and languages spoken by Native American’s in Oklahoma, the topic of this paper will be upon the Osage nation and its language, more formally known as Wazhazhe. To begin, a brief history of the Osage people must first be introduced in order to allow for better insight into the circumstances and events that have led to the current status of the Osage nation. Originally located in the areas of the Ohio-River valley including Missouri and areas near the Missouri and Osage rivers, the Osage Indians hunted small game including elk, deer and bison. The men of the Osage were in
Throughout the 19th century Native Americans were treated far less than respectful by the United States’ government. This was the time when the United States wanted to expand and grow rapidly as a land, and to achieve this goal, the Native Americans were “pushed” westward. It was a memorable and tricky time in the Natives’ history, and the US government made many treatments with the Native Americans, making big changes on the Indian nation. Native Americans wanted to live peacefully with the white men, but the result of treatments and agreements was not quite peaceful. This precedent of mistreatment of minorities began with Andrew Jackson’s indian removal policies to the tribes of Oklahoma (specifically the Cherokee indians) in 1829 because of the lack of respect given to the indians during the removal laws.