What is the best method to respond to conflict? Many people such as Lt. Kotler in “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas: A Fable” by John Boyne would argue that the best method to respond to conflict is violently. The best ways to respond to conflict are through peace. Peaceful ways of responding to conflict are more beneficial than violent ways, peaceful methods of responding to conflict are easier than violent ways, and violent ways of responding to conflict can drag other people into the conflict. Peaceful ways of responding to conflict are more beneficial than non-peaceful ways. In an article about peaceful protesting, Sanford writes, “Descriptions of British clubs striking unarmed Indians in the Salt March drew worldwide sympathy. In the U.S. …show more content…
In “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas: A Fable”, Lt. Kotler and Shmuel argue, “‘Answer me!’ shouted Lieutenant Kotler. ‘Did you steal something from that fridge?’ ‘No, sir. He gave it to me,’ said Shmuel, tears welling up in his eyes as he threw a sideways glance at Bruno. ‘He’s my friend,’ he added” (Boyne). Instead of fighting back, Shmuel complies with the conflict peacefully. Fighting back against Lt. Kotler would have taken a lot of strength, which Shmuel did not have. In “The Diary of Anne Frank”, Anne writes, “A call-up: everyone knows what that means. Visions of concentration camps and lonely cells raced through my head. How could we let Father go to such a fate? ‘Of course he's not going,’ declared Margot as we waited for Mother in the living room. ‘Mother's gone to Mr. van Daan to ask whether we can move to our hiding place tomorrow” (Frank). There would be more pressure for the Frank family if they had gone along with the call-up than if they peacefully hid. Anne and the rest of the Frank family hid from the violence of the holocaust. In an interview with Flora Robertson says, “Question: First you had the flood, then the grasshoppers and then the dust storms. Flora Robertson: Yes, and we waited. It was about five years before we just really gave up. Every year we began going back. We were just in debt so much we thought we never could get out.” Flora Robertson and many others peacefully …show more content…
Peaceful methods of responding to conflict are better than non-peaceful methods, peaceful methods can be simpler than violent ways of responding to conflict, and non-peaceful ways of responding to conflict can hurt others. Based on these reasons, the reader can infer that responding to conflict peacefully can help them with many other problems they face in life. Works Cited Boyne, John. “The Boy in the Striped Pajamas: A Fable.” Studysync: Reading &Writing Companion, BookheadEd Learning, LLC, 2015. Churchill, Winston. “Blood, Toil, Tears, and Sweat.” Studysync: Reading &Writing Companion, BookheadEd Learning, LLC, 2015. Frank, Anne. “The Diary of a Young Girl.” Studysync: Reading &Writing Companion, BookheadEd Learning, LLC, 2015. “The Paris Peace Conference and Treaty of Versailles of 1919.” Newsela, 3 Jan. 2017, newsela.com/read/lib-treaty-versailles-paris-conference/id/38872/. Sanford, Whitney. “What Gandhi Can Teach Today's Protesters.” Newsela, 31 Oct. 2017, newsela.com/read/lib-convo-gandhi-protests-today/id/36654. Robertson, Flora, et al. “Primary Sources, Interview on the Dust Bowl Storms of Oklahoma in 1934.” Newsela, 5 Apr. 2017, newsela.com/read/primary-source-interview-dust-bowl-oklahoma/id/28834. “Wilson's Call to War Pulled America Onto the World Stage in 1917.” Newsela, 24 Apr. 2017,
Throughout the interview he would mention studying Gandhi’s peaceful protest tactics and using them while they were doing their own protests. 2. The thing that I learned from this article is the fact that the people that John Lewis marched or protested with practiced being treated terribly. That they were learning how not to fight back instead of fighting fire with fire. Through the
We do not need to get involved in violence to prove point. Gandhi pointed out that a nation does not rise because of war, it rises because of its people. People who voice their opinion and protest, but in a peaceful manner. Truth also went about her campaign with women’s rights in a peaceful way. “...I see women contending’ for their rights…”
In both stories the protagonist have and feel as if they have little to no power in the direction of which their life is heading. Shmuel the Jewish boy that Bruno befriends in The Boy in the Striped Pajamas does not really talk about or try to explain to Bruno what is really happening to him or even to try and ask Bruno why his people are doing this to his people. Bruno and Shmuel do
Many things changed while they were in the annex. Throughout the years, the moods and relationships of the families in the annex were significantly changed by what happened in the outside world. At first, the holocaust progressed slowly, but soon caused the Franks and a few others to go into hiding. Though it may seem that they would be much safer in the annex, there life had completely changed. Everything and anything could go wrong and get them caught.
In contrast to the Wakatsuki’s, the Frank family was put in a life or death situation. They were targeted by the German Nazi Party in which discriminated all Jews. Unlike Jeanne Wakatsuki, Anne’s family had a smaller area to work with and could not step foot out of the door. She attempts to put the situation in her own words. As stated in The Diary of a Young Girl, “I see the eight of us in the Annex as if we were a patch of blue sky surrounded by menacing black clouds.
Set during WWII, this story is seen through the eyes of a young boy named Bruno, the son of a commandant at a Jewish concentration camp. As shown in the title Bruno experiences anti-Semitism in a different way, he believes the people at the camp always wear their pyjamas but obviously that is not the case. Bruno lives a privileged life to have not experienced prejudice, however; Shmuel lives an unprivileged life, he has been brought up with the violent acts of the commandants and has the understanding of
President Woodrow Wilson established America’s goal for joining World War I as “making the world safe for democracy.” At the conclusion of the War, President Wilson declared fourteen principles for peace to be used during the Paris Peace Conference, called the Fourteen Points. The most important of these points was the final point: a general association of nations with the guarantees of political and territorial independence and security. As the Peace Conference progressed, more nations ratified the Treaty of Versailles and joined the League of Nations, the embodiment of President Wilson’s fourteenth point. However, Senate the United States, from President Wilson’s own country, did not ratify the treaty.
I couldn 't go to the movies, or ride in an automobile, or even in a streetcar, and a million other things” (Act I, Scene 1, pg. 8, Anne). Another one of the many themes in this story is to always have hope. The Holocaust was an extremely difficult time to live in, but through it all, the Franks never lost hope. It was hard to keep hope, but through constant encouragement from each other, they managed to stay hopeful, even through the hardest times. "For the past two years we have lived in fear.
Conflict resolution as a field of study as indicated has formed hypothetical bits of knowledge into the nature and source of conflict and how conflicts can be resolved through peaceful systems to effectuate a dependable settlement. Morton Deutsch, was the first to form and understanding into the helpful results of collaboration as a scholastic enquiry. In his view, various variables like the way of the debate and the objectives every group in a conflict goes for are crucial in deciding the sort of introduction a group would convey to the negotiation table in its endeavor to unravel the conflict (Morton Deucth, 1985, p.24). To him, two essential orientations do exist. These are competitive and cooperative.
(Hook) World War II was a dark period in the history of the world, where about six million Jews were killed in Nazi concentration camps. (Bridge) A few of those individuals were Anne Frank and her family. (FS1) Anne Frank and her family were Jews, living in a time period where it was illegal to be of that ethnicity and religion. (FS2)
This is a confusing, powerful story set during World War II where wealthy ignorant boy meets an “out-with” Jew. the film stays true to the book through the plot where Bruno dies, And deviates through the mother 's character and the resolution. Since Bruno died of the same reason in both the film version and the book, it shows how the film stayed true to the book. Bruno had left to go to the Concentration Camp with Shmuel thinking they would just go find Shmuel’s father and Say Goodbye.
Imagine how it feels to be stuck in a tiny, miniscule room for almost two years, not able to make a sound or movement and if heard by someone,death or concentration camp is the destination? The Diary of Anne Frank by Frances Goodrich and Albert Hackett is about a small family which consists of Anne, Margot, Mr. Frank, and Mrs. Frank who were in a shock of fear, and went into hiding during the Nazi occupation of the Netherlands. Over the course of the story other characters join the family into hiding such as Mr. and Mrs. Van Daan, and their son Peter. During the time of hiding, Anne kept a diary to write down all her thoughts, fears, and feelings and was later known to be the most important piece of literature from the times of the Holocaust. The story takes you through their everyday lives of hiding in the annex which also includes arguing and times of happiness.
This was the beginning of their friendship created during tough times of the Holocaust. The races of Jews and Germans were separated after World War I and Jews were put into concentration camps run by the Nazis. This quote shows that Bruno did not want to disagree with his friend Shmuel even though they did not share the same ideas. Both boys knew the differences they had, but they put them aside and became friends. In
Shmuel, a Jewish prisoner, and Bruno, the offspring of a Nazi soldier, were searching throughout the concentration camp for Shmuel’s father. While searching, there was no sign of Shmuel's father anywhere. However, a guard tricked the Jews into getting them to take a “shower”. Everyone, even Bruno and Shmuel became excited and unaware. As time went on, the guards led the Jews into a gas chamber, where Bruno and Shmuel were never to be seen again.
The violent conflict approach is defined through coercion, threats, and destructive assaults. Galtung’s, model suggests that each of these components influence one another, and while each