The Pros And Cons Of Standardized Intelligence Testing

2. IQ testing seems a bit more complicated that I once would have thought. How do we measure IQ in such a way that will reliably measure an individual’s intelligence against what they will do in life?

IQ while a good evaluation of a persons ability to solve logic problems is not the epitome of intelligence. If you have IQ with out practical or social intelligence in a significant quantity it wont garner you much success in the world. It needs an addition of that practical or social intelligence in order for you to become exceptionally successful within the world. The examples put forth in the book are of Chris Langan who’s IQ was in the 190 to 200’s range, Terman’s Termites (a group of students with IQ’s of 140+ that Terman followed for his Genetic Studies of Genius.), and Robert Oppenheimer. We also have two differing tests one that touches on just IQ and the other that touches on practical intelligence.

The Woodcock Johnson – Fourth Edition (WJ-IV) was administered in order to obtain an estimate of Isaac’s current level of cognitive functioning. Intelligence tests are intended to assess the student’s ability in acquired skills and specific knowledge, problem-solving capabilities, and memory. The scores obtained on the WJ IV can provide an estimate of the student’s performance in school. Nevertheless, these tests do not measure Isaacs’s interest in creativity, curiosity, perseverance, and motivation. The WJIV yields the students cognitive ability information from six clusters: General Intellectual Ability (GIA), Gf-Gc Composite, Comprehension-Knowledge (Gc), Fluid Reasoning (Gf), Short-Term Working Memory (Gwm) and Cognitive Efficiency.

Standardized testing not only stresses out students, but it also leads the teachers to go in a dilemma whether to focus on the curriculum or to get students ready for the standardized testing. No one has ever enjoyed taking a test in his or her entire educational history. Similarly Mr. Estrada’s 4th grade class was not every excited about taking standardized test. Each student has his or her own level of learning. As the students were taking the test, I noticed some students were panicking, while others were confused.

In Malcolm Gladwell’s “None of the Above” he explains that over time the I.Q. of people is constantly changing somewhat based upon their race. People are getting smarter than their ancestors meaning a higher I.Q. Dependent on the person’s race and family locus will have input on what the person's I.Q. will be. Gladwell informs and persuades people that I.Q.’s defines who a person is and puts a stereotype on individuals like Blacks are not as smart as Causation people for example. People understand that over time the brain in humans has developed substantially with evolution. Gladwell makes the audience feel pitiful by mentioning stereotypes that appeal as pathetic.

The SAT was created from the Army Alpha test which was used to test the IQ of army recruits. The Army Alpha Test was the first mass administered IQ test. Carl Brigham began adjusting the Army Alpha for college admissions. Brigham’s test was given experimentally to a few thousand college applicants in 1926. This test was thought to be a good way of measuring innate ability regardless of prior education.

These tests promised a way to identify kids who could go further in their education, while separating them from the kids who learned slower and would need extra help. The tests also came with the notion of academic tracking in order to steer students onto a career path deemed appropriate for them (Gershon, 2015). Attempting to measure a student’s intelligence through a standardized test is beyond absurd. All students learn at a different pace. This means that, even if a student may not know a skill at the time of the test, it doesn’t mean that they will never know it.

The two intelligences that are taught in schools are logical/mathematical intelligence and verbal/linguistic intelligence. 3. The other five include spatial, musical, kinesthetic, interpersonal and intrapersonal which are all incredibly important in order to function in today’s society. II. The pressure that is applied by standardized testing is unhealthy to a learning environment.

The G factor is a good indication of school performance Disadvantages/weakness of Charles Spearman’s theory: 1. The backlash and criticism regarding how the G factor only measures General Intelligence 2. The G factor doesn’t take into account other various activities such as motor abilities, perception and musical abilities. HOWARD GARDNER: MULTIPLE INTELLIGENCE Multiple Intelligence: Howard Gardner (1943-current) originally identified and stated that there are 7 (later 9) specific types of intelligence. Gardner argued that students across a broad scale would retain information better if the information was displayed in a number of ways, due to the fact that an individual’s cognitive ability varies in the different types of multiple

This critique will be reviewing the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition (WISC-IV). The WISC-IV was authored by David Weschler and was published by PsychCorp, which is a brand of Harcourt Assessment Inc in 2003 (Plake, 2005). The Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children Fourth Generation can take anywhere from 65-80 minutes to administer and should be done individually (Plake, 2005). In The Sixteenth Mental Measurements Yearbook Plake (2005) states, an individual administering the WISC-IV should allow for an additional 10-15 minutes if using supplemental tests.

In standardized tests and tests in general, the mean is the average score derived from a group of scores. The mean is determined by adding up all the scores and dividing the sum by the number of scores added (Woolfolk, p. 632, 2013). The median, as the name implies, is the middle score. The median lies at the midpoint of a set of scores, with an equal number of scores distributed above it and below it. The mode is essentially the score that occurs the most often.

Standardized tests don’t exactly give any feedback on how the students and teachers are to perform better. The results aren’t given back until months later, and there are no instructions provided by test agencies on how to improve these test scores. They don’t even tell you what you got wrong, you get a number, or a rating like advanced, proficient, average or below average. Nothing about how to improve or somehow get a better score. Infact, standardized tests weren’t created by geniuses that we may think they were.

The development of the Simon-Binet test, constituted a revolutionary approach to the assessment of individual mental ability. Binet himself revolutionized the fields of education and psychology, especially in regard to intelligence testing. He was asked to find a way to identify children with learning problems who needed to be placed in special classes. To address these practical educational concerns, he constructed the first successful intelligence test. His findings were ahead of time and developed an understanding of individual differences of both typically and atypically developing children.

(2) How do teacher prepare children to take standardized test.? Getting student ready for testing, teacher must prepare instruction that not only prepare students for testing, but they must also make sure that the state standard is being met. Accordingly, to Hollingworth (2007) as stated in the text, there are five ways to prepare student for testing. (1) Teacher adjust their instructional program with the state’s curriculum to make sure they are teaching what is on the test; (2) They also set goals for student and record their progress; (3) They give the student reading and writing activities to help

JobTestPrep’s Watson-Glaser Critical Thinking online IQ Tests are related to critical thinking assessment is recommended for professionals, executives and managers at any level. Today’s IQ Tests Questions are designed in the form of multiple choices testing that has right and wrong answers and is mostly timed tasks-performance.