Canadian Association of People who Use Drugs (CAPUD) created a concept document in February 2019. The theory of CAPUD is to create easier access to obtain drugs without going through the illegal drug market by legalizing and regulating drug supplies. Example of the drugs includes heroin, cocaine, fentanyl, stimulants, ecstasy, and acid. CAPUD believes that the need for this Safety Supply touches on safety, human rights, justice, and effectiveness. When the drugs are being regulated, it is safer for the drug users, so there will be fewer people passing away due to overdosage. CAPUD believes that people who use drugs shouldn’t be charged as a criminal as trying to take away drugs from someone who is recovering is unethical. This also ties in …show more content…
The adolescents may be the victim or take advantage of this concept as they are still young and curious about trying new experiences. The domino effects maybe occur once they know about this Safe Supply. These young adults have easy access to try going to the pharmacy and obtaining one since a prescription is not required and could be managed by themselves. After they tried the substance, they might just be more curious and research it on the internet or with friends. However, due to the dosage being administered, they may realize that the experience they just received is different than what their information told them which causes more curiosity. The adolescents then can go to the pharmacy again and may find a way to get more dosage until they are unable to do so, which may lead them to research how to get more of the substance. Once CAPUD’s objective was to eliminate the illicit drug market, ironically, the curiosity of adolescents may lead them to this place. When they experienced how different the experience was, they may get more addicted than their family and friends noticed. The now-addicted young adults may now resort back to Safe Supply to begin their recovery process. Relapse may occur in addicted individuals which would make the recovery
Although this epidemic has been surging for the past 30 years, there has yet to have been an effective solution to drastically reduce the number of deaths and recurring addictions. The U.S. government has implemented different solutions, but the use of opioids still prevails. Even though drug use is criminalized in most places in the U.S., people are still continuing to use and abuse drugs. While many different approaches are hypothesized to stop the use of drugs, new forms of opioid use and problems seem to arise. There exists stigmas, stereotypes, and false information that have spread about drug use and addiction which hinders people's abilities to be able to understand and offer help to addicts and drug users.
In other words, McGreal believes that corruption in various organizations created the perfect storm for the deadly opioid epidemic that now exists. Next, the author points out that American healthcare operates like a lucrative industry, which means that profit takes priority over people’s health. The author asserts that patients are given opioids because they are inexpensive, easily accessible, and highly addictive (McGreal). This means that the American healthcare system is driven by profit, and when dangerous opioids are prescribed excessively, individuals and organizations are made wealthy by innocent people’s addiction. Lastly, the author emphasizes that America is prey to this epidemic because our demanding, unhealthy culture believes that medication is the first step to feeling well.
Therefore, this paper will focus on the frequent use by the teenage population, its risks, the law, and the debate on the legalization of
Besides, addiction is a treatable disease and he also states his idea about how to solve it. Therefore both of the authors express the worry to drug problem in
The objective of this paper is to compare both U.S drug laws and Canada’s drug laws to identify how they differ and present my insight on this matter. How the United States constructs, its drug laws are without a doubt contrastive to Canada. It begins with lawmakers distinguishing the difference between illegal drugs and legal drugs. For the most part, the legality of drugs highly depends on how it’s consumed. Meaning whether or not its doctor prescribed or under physician care,
"We discovered that these students frame stimulant use as both physically harmless and morally acceptable," (Devon Frye, Additude Magazine). The primary way FDA works to prevent misuse and abuse is through educating patients, caregivers, and healthcare professionals. This often occurs through the information FDA provides to each of these groups, such as in drug labels, medication guides, and alerts. The FDA is trying to inform people of the risks and hazards, but there are still people who either don’t pay attention, or are not aware of these things. (Laurie Raymond, M.D., Physician Health
Substance abuse and addiction is an issue which has had a growing impact on society for decades. Millions in Canada each year suffer from addiction and even death with larger and larger percentages of the population finding it easier to gain access to illegal substances. Use of illegal substances will often lead to substance abuse and addiction. Addiction is very powerful as it can have strong adverse effects, rewiring the brain and destroying life in pursuit of a substance. Efforts have been made to combat this issue in Canada, with increased funding to law enforcement to combat illegal sale and possession of substances, however this problem continues and has no end in sight.
Without patient’s being aware of how to power the drug was, it eventually leads to the Opioids Crisis in America which now put a horrible word for the doctors and companies when it all starts by one person abusing the opioid pill. President Donald J. Trump idea that he had in mind was stated in the article of America’s Opioid Crisis, “But he reinforced the idea that the victims are to blame with an offhand reference to LSD.” Which indeed has the fact that people are to blame for misusage of the
As the years go by, people find new, efficient ways to make the drugs and get ahold of them. As a result, people will abuse more drugs yearly. With each generation making new ways of getting drugs, more children will be able to get ahold of them and use them early on. Families get torn apart, jobs get sabotaged, and lives are lost all because they couldn’t get the help they
First, there is alarming rise in mortality rates together with other formidable effects initiated by the anomalous use of opioid pain relievers. A study by the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (2014) outlines that in 2009, more than 15,500 individuals in the United States died due to overdose on opiate pain relievers, a 300% rise in accordance with its history for the last 20 years. These alarming figures have increased the national interest regarding the climb in for script drug abuse in the United States. An additional cause is the escalating diversion of these drugs. Diversion in association with drugs implies to the illegal usage of licit dugs; and it happens when medications are counterfeit, medical records have been interfered with showing false information that a certain drug has been administered while it has actually been purloined, or when prescriptions go missing or stolen.
For example, agencies have been established with the sole intent to manage drug use and distribution and technology has been exclusively developed to detect the presence of drugs. Yet, evidence has indicated that such exhaustive efforts have been relatively unsuccessful. First, it has been assumed that drugs have perpetuated violence in society and based on this rationale, it was believed that by the suppressing the pervasiveness of drugs that incidents of violence would simultaneously diminish. However, reality has failed to align with the expectations that had initially been anticipated. Research findings have suggested that the decriminalization of drugs would result in a less adversarial drug market in which conflicts have tended to arise among dealers as well as between dealers and buyers (Common Sense for Drug Policy, 2007, p. 21).
Education about overdose or providing referrals to medical and social services such as health screenings are offered. Also, incorporating harm reduction strategies into public health interventions for people who inject drugs may be helpful in resolving other health care (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2016). One argument against Needle Exchange programs is that by providing needles and syringes to addicts, the government is essentially condoning illicit and immoral behavior (“Debate: Needle exchanges”). Drug users are continuously given free access of clean utensil to shoot up. Instead of providing them access, the government should focus on punishing drug users, discourage drug-use, and provide more treatment for quitting
In the name of fighting drug abuse, governments unleashed a war on drugs that continues to rage today. Drugs have numerous negative consequences that can result from an addiction, but some can have positive effects when used appropriately and under the care of a healthcare professional. The War on Drugs is a government-led initiative aimed at stopping illegal drug use, distribution, and trade by issuing increased prison sentences for drug-related offenses, and it increased federal funding for drug-control agencies and treatment efforts. Instead, it has resulted in a disproportionate amount of incarcerations of minorities.
Drugs are the dangerous substances that will destroy the consumer both physically and mentally; therefore, it is necessary to determine these substances restrictively. In order to do that, I am strongly assuring that the drugs should be legalized. There are three main reasons why the drugs should be legalized: diminution of crime rates, health guarantee, and extending of drugs regulation. Drugs are one of the crime sources, although not by the drugs, itself, but the condition. Illegal drugs are rare products that could not be found in the normal market, the cost for its rarity is totally expensive.
2: Though sentences will raise the fear to people and they will avoid using it. 1: I fully agree with author that there should be proper rehabilitation program for drug offender inmates so that they can return to society again and fully give up the drug uses. 1: I agree that some private jails’ guidance are not good. 2: They don‘t give much time on them and they do not give proper guidance to inmates. 3: Only they try to make profit themselves.