A “Dolled-Up” World In everyday life, we are bombarded with information whether we are aware of it or not. By indulging in our senses, we are unconsciously processing data and responding appropriately to our environment. The nature of our environment is also known as society. As humans, we biologically crave connection with one another. It is the reason why we seek intimacy and reproduce, and why we socialize. Our numbers grow to create a social group also known as a society. Everything we see or do is shaped by our interactions, and our interactions happen socially. I am going to argue that playwright Henrik Ibsen was socially influenced by the 19th century feminist movement in Europe to write A Doll’s House. His work is socially produced …show more content…
First, the dramatic text is socially produced because it was inspired by women's lack of political rights in the 19th century. In the past, Europe was mainly a male-dominant society. Males worked a fulltime job while females were house-bound. A Doll’s House quite clearly reflects this in the way that the husband, Torvald, holds a job as a bank manager while his wife, Nora, has duties stuck to the maintenance of the household. In this period, women were expected to obey commands from their spouse; we see this when Torvald asserts his male dominance and commands to Nora, “I won’t allow it! I forbid you!” (Ibsen 67). In the end, when she realized she was used like a “doll” by Torvald (as all wives were to their husbands at the time), she defiantly replies, “There is no use forbidding me…”. The …show more content…
The controversial ending of the play caused an uproar of critics, stating that Nora’s transformation from a naïve child in acts 1 and 2 to a cold feminist in act 3 is far-fetched and unrealistic. Some even argue that the prideful slam of the door at the end is not unlike a child throwing a tantrum. It was actually meant to be comedic and “…leave us laughing heartily, for there is no doubt that she will return home…” (Weigand, 68). Norwegian scholar Else Hest states, “The charming ‘lark’ could never have become the ‘newly fledged feminist’…it is the childish, ecstatic broken-hearted Nora who makes A Doll House immortal; the other one, the unfeeling women of act 3 who coldly analyzes the flaws in her marriage, is psychologically unconvincing and wholly unsympathetic.” (28). In the 19th century, much of the European audience did not appreciate the way marriage was being portrayed in the play, namely, the male critics. They depicted the validation of her reason to leave her family for the sake of her own wellbeing. The controversy had such a large influence on his work that Ibsen was prodded to write an alternative ending, thinking not only would it be more favorited at the box office but also gain approval among people. Ibsen did write an alternative ending in which, instead of Nora leaving, she collapses in front of the children’s
This realization forces Nora into the real world. It is not only that Torvald would not sacrifice himself for her that opens Nora’s eyes to reality. She did not understand that though Torvald loved her, he loved her as a thing. At the end of the play, Nora deserts her husband so that she may pursue a life with meaning and
Torvald tells her that Nora has a duty as a mother and a wife but Nora tells him that “she is an individual”, showing that she is finally putting herself on par with Torvald, and no longer allowing Torvald to control her, but instead she is trying to gain independence and liberation from social norms in order to break free from the “Doll’s House.” She tells him that she must leave him, because “for eight years [she’d] been living with a stranger”, emphasising how there was never any proper communication and mutual understanding between them, and hence no proper marriage, as she didn’t actually know what his true character was like up until that night, as she was convinced all along that Torvald would be the man to take everything upon
The play is widely considered to be earliest feminist plays and a timeless classic. It explored the double standards of society and the flaws of the idea of marriage present in its time. It is said to have shed light upon discrepancies between the roles of man and women and the inequality present between the two genders. These issues have progressed and been improved upon however they are still very much present in our society and many still feel their effects. The relationships in Doll’s House is the key focus for a large
In the beginning of the play, Nora thought and acted like the woman in her era remaining true to her marriage, with her only identity being her father’s daughter and a wife to Torvald; this is very evident in one of her dialogues with Torvald where she stated “I have existed merely to perform tricks for you, Torvald. But you would have it so. It's your fault that I have made nothing of my life’’ (Ibsen, 2008). On the contrary, the treasured marriage vows of the olden days have become nothing but a promise made to be broken as more women leave their marriages due to irreconcilable differences or at the slightest abuse be it mentally, verbally or
My little songbird must never do that again. A songbird must have a clean beak to sing with. Otherwise she’ll start twittering out of tune.” Ibsen creates an atmosphere where Torvald behaves like Nora’s father , reinforcing her stereotype as childish by the way she is being spoken to. His use of parallelism between women and animals, display Torvald is aware of his dominance and that his wife needs to be treated inferiorly in order for her to obey.
During act III, Nora asked to speak to Torvald after her performance of the tarantella dance. The following conversation demonstrated her quest for autonomy and freedom, as well as Torvald’s inadequate responses to her arguments and demands; it also showed how deeply connected her unhappy situation is with society’s regulation of the relationship between the sexes. She asserts that she is “...first and foremost a human being”, and her strong conviction that her womanhood, and the expectations associated with it, are secondary, strengthens her resolve to make a radical choice: A break with both husband and, with necessity due to her legal position, her children (Ibsen, 184). During her conversation with Torvald, she proclaims, “I have other sacred duties... The duties to myself (Ibsen, 184).”
The play ‘A Doll’s house’ is a three act play written by Henrik Ibsen. - BLABLA BLA-. The story, however could be interpreted differently by different readers greatly depending on their cultural context. In this essay will be discussed how a Freudian and a Feminist reader might interpret the plot, the character relations and the ending differently. A Feminist might argue that the story’s underlying message is to unveil the power dynamic during the 19th century between men and women.
Henrik Ibsen’s play rocked the stages of Europe when the play was performed in Europe but due to the controversial ending he had to change the end quite a bit. In the end Nora Helmer deserts’ her husband and children to go on and make a life of her own due, to the Victorian mindset people did not accept an ending where a woman leaves the house and goes against a man’s will and hence Ibsen had to make Nora return to her family. Ibsen
(Ibsen 7). Torvald questions Nora, as a father would, while Nora lies, like a child. Although, Nora and Torvald are married,
A Doll’s House: Character Comparison and Contrast Henrik Ibsen’s A Doll’s House contains a cast of deeply complex characters that emulate the 1800’s societal norms that they belong to. Two characters that compare and contrast each other throughout the play are Nora Helmer and Kristine Linde. Nora and Kristine are similar because they both display a sense of independence. Their personalities differ as Nora presents herself as inexperienced, while Kristine is more grounded in reality.
For Nora, the goal was not to simply escape her life but instead to make a life for herself that she could be proud of and live with happily. Torvald did not treat her with the respect that a husband should treat a wife by modern standards and while this might have been considered a controversial decision for the period in which it was written, by modern standards it can easily be shown as the logical way to end the
A masterpiece of creative act that instantly portrays the hypocrisy of the Victorian middle class, a Dolls House was written by Henrik Ibsen in 1879 a major 19th-century Norwegian playwright, theatre director, and poet. He is often referred to as "the father of realism" and is one of the founders of Modernism in theatre. The story takes place on Christmas eve where Nora and Torvald the two main characters represent the importance of gender roles and social image throughout the Victorian era. The conflict of the story is driven by Nora’s forging of loan documents to raise money for an expensive trip to Italy; Krogstad, who had processed the loan, tries to blackmail Nora over the fact that she forged the documents. Nora who risked jeopardizing her husband’s image had set the tone throughout the play as the constant change in personality set the tone of the play which I have really enjoyed due to the unpredictable plot twists and a chance to be engaged with The Victorian culture at that time period.
The denouement of the play is received differently by both the readers. In act 3, when Nora intrepidly questions Helmer 's perception of her "most sacred duty" towards her "husband and children", she questions the Victorian era reader 's ideals and beliefs as well which leaves the reader infuriated. Moreover, Nora is thought of as unhinged when she "slams" the door, in hopes of transforming from Helmer 's "little songbird" into a "woman." This is not the case with the modern reader who is relieved by Nora 's epiphany as she begins "to realize everything", including the need to become "independent." The modern reader, on the time spectrum, has had the chance to discuss the sexism that prevails in society and the need for feminism;
This play, A Doll’s House by Henrik Ibsen, focuses on women, especially in marriage and motherhood. Torvald is a character, who describes inequality between men and women and the women’s role in the society in that era. He believes that it is an important and the only duty of a woman to be a good wife and mother. As an individual, a woman, could not conduct or run a business of her own, she needs to ask her father or husband and they were only considered to be father’s or husband’s property. Women were not allowed to vote and divorce if they were allowed they would carry a heavy social shame and it was only available when both partners agreed.
He knows that there is more to marriage than just having honesty and trust. Yes, honesty and trust are big and there should be some in a marriage, but Henrik Ibsen is shows that there needs to be more by making Nora the main character and expressing more how she feels. He promotes this values of having more to marriage than honesty and trust by showing us slowly throughout the play how miserable Nora really was. He was promoting this when Nora would rebel and tell her friends Mrs. Lindel and Dr. Rank what she really desired to do behind her husband 's back. He also promoted that there 's more to marriage when Nora decided she could no longer live the same way she had been living for the last eight years of her