Andrew Jackson should be viewed as a villain. Primary sources such as ¨Treaty of New Echota¨, ¨Private John G. Burnett's account of the Trail of Tears¨ ¨Warning from the south carolina to Jackson regarding Tariff of 1828¨ and ¨Jackson's response to south carolina, 1832¨ explains that, he should be viewed as a villain because he released Cherokee Indians claims. He mistreated the Cherokees and shipped them out west. Finally, he didn't help the continuance of South Carolina. Jackson released the Cherokees' claims. According to the article, ¨Treaty of New Echota, 1835¨ it states, ¨hereby release all their claims upon the United states.¨ This explains that when he released all their claims about the United States, Jackson didn't listen to how the Cherokee Indians felt. It also states, ¨´that a sum not exceeding five millions of dollars be paid to the Cherokee Indians for all their lands and possessions east of Mississippi.¨ This explains that he didn't want to give them the money for their lands or possessions. …show more content…
For example in the article, ¨Private John G. Burnett's account of the Trail of Tears, 1889¨ states, ¨I saw them loaded like cattle or sheep into six hundred and forty five wagons and started toward the west.¨ This shows that they weren't treated like humans, they were getting treated like animals. It also explains how they were sent out west, away from Jackson. Another example from the text is, ¨the sufferings of the Cherokees were awful. The trail of the exiles was a trail of death. They had to sleep in the wagons and on the ground without fire.¨ This explains that Jackson had them sleeping on the floor with no fire to keep the Cherokees
2.2 In Andrew Jackson’s argument, Jackson addresses his opinions about the treaty and Cherokees that let us know the main purpose of this treaty, “[i]t seems now to be an established fact that [Cherokees] can not live in contact with a civilized community and prosper.” And he also explains the new settlements and those people’s lives, “…the Indians are removed at the expense of the United States, and with certain supplies of clothing, arms, ammunition, and other indispensable articles; they are also furnished gratuitously with provisions for the period of a year after their arrival at their new
He was a strict constructionist, meaning he believed that the power of Congress should be limited. This was especially true when it came to the National Bank. Jackson believed that Congress should stay out of the national economy and let it run its course. While Jackson looks to be a hero, history proves him to be a villain. Andrew Jackson was a villain because he forced Native Americans off their land, gave government jobs to his unqualified friends, and started the Bank War.
But, Jackson Completely did not care about the Native Americans and used great military force when the deadline was reaching for the “Trail of Tears” to end. In the end Andrew Jackson because of his force killed over 4000 Native Americans on the journey. This was very cruel for Jackson to do, especially killing this many people on the journey. On top of his killing them, it was very inhumane for him to make them walk this distance and not even give them any help along the treacherous journey. You might have thought that this was all for the better for the states and expanding the new nation, but it was uncalled for him to force
He would refer to them in inhumane ways and forced them to move from their tribes just so he could benefit from their land. Jackson commented “... and perhaps cause them gradually, under the protection of the government and through the influence of good counsel, to cast off their savage habits and become an interesting, civilized, and Christian community” (Document 5). The Indians are being portrayed as aggressive animals when Jackson refers to their “savage habits.” Jackson not only made negative remarks about the Indians, but he also allowed soldiers to make the removal of Indians brutal, while knowing there was no way the Indians could defend themselves. Soldiers would not allow Indians to gather any belongings when they were picked up, not even another change of clothing.
My historical figure is Andrew Jackson and I am going to be discussing his hard life on the things he went through to get to his successful life as the seventh president. It all began where he was born and raised in waxhaws. Waxhaws was near the North carolina and South carolina border. It was a small area, but jackson got through a lot of tough times in that town. Andrew Jackson was born on March 15, 1767 in Waxhaws.
Andrew Jackson is known as one of the most controversial presidents in the history of the United States. While many of his policies were seen as great strides for American democracy, his actions towards Native American tribes and enslaved Africans make him a villain to many. During his presidency, Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act of 1830, which forcibly removed thousands of Native Americans from their ancestral lands and caused immense suffering and death. This act led to the infamous Trail of Tears, where thousands of Native Americans died during the forced relocation.
Jackson kicked his mount to a trot and rode out, leading the black horse. He joined the high street and followed it to the outskirts of town, where it became the road to the plains leading to the great castle of Baymore and his father. The night was bitter cold, but no snow fell yet, and the full moon shone bright, casting sharp blue shadows on the light frost that coated everything. The horses’ hooves crunched the thin layer of ice that covered the dirt road, their hot breath blowing clouds of vapor.
While recounting many historical events in modern history, in which a group of innocent people were stripped of freedom, individual identity, and their role in humanity in general, most people today would automatically assume you were referring to The Holocaust. What if i told you that there is a lesser talked about event in which the devastating effects on a minority population go hand and hand, and at the center of this reprehensible affair? An american “hero,” Andrew Jackson. israelights driving out the palwstrinians “when we were commanded to drive pagen nations.” Andrew Jackson, probably most remembered for his war efforts and defeat of the british at New Orleans int the war of 1812, isn't exactly the ideal of a morally based man.
Andrew Jackson was a controversial president because many people believed he could be a hero or a villain. Andrew did many things that made different people think different things about him. Andrew Jackson was a villain, and I will be explaining many reasons why. One of the first reasons is because of the Trail of Tears. The Trail of Tears was a horrible act because Jackson forced all of the Native Americans to move west with no time to gather all of their items.
government had had enough of these protests against the Removal Act, so they began to enforce it. The Choctaw were the first to travel on foot towards Indian Country without food, supplies or their promised help from the government, and had been threatened by the U.S. The Creek Indians were threatened by the U.S. and made their long perilous journey over the border in 1836, but only 3,500 of 15,000 survived. This trail was quickly referenced as the “Trail where they cried”, or Trail of Tears. Only 2,000 Cherokee had left their home by 1838, so President Van Buren sent the army was sent to round up Natives to prison camps. Soldiers forced the Cherokee from their homes, but did not fight back under their chief’s orders.
Is Andrew Jackson a hero or a villain? Throughout history Jackson has been viewed as both. Some see him as a war hero and the people’s president. Others see him as a racist and a political tyrant. To me, Andrew Jackson is more of a hero.
There were two different points of view discussed in the documents. The first view from “Appeal of the Cherokee Nation” showed how the Cherokee was trying to show the congress their point of view about moving from their homeland to a place they do not know. They made valid points why they were not willing to move and their first reason was how they valued their current home because it was the land of their ancestors and they honored their dead in these lands. The Cherokee believed that leaving to the western territory would provoke the western tribes to violence towards the Cherokee members. Andrew Jackson had a different point of view and he was wanting the Cherokee land to use their resources and make more room for white citizens.
In conclusion, there is much evidence to support the idea that Andrew Jackson was a tyrant and vastly abused his power in presidency. Jackson was a cruel ruler for his actions, some including the Indian Removal Act, his overuse of vetoing, and his temper and personality. Overall he was just not right for the position of a political
No living human is either entirely virtuous or wholeheartedly evil. Sometimes it can seem that way, but that’s because most of the time individuals hear want to hear what they want to hear. This concept is entirely true in regard to Andrew Jackson, who people can see as a heroic American war hero who came from nothing and stood by his beliefs or the complete opposite. People could also perceive him as an evil, tyrannical leader who forced thousands of Native Americans out of their homes. I believe Andrew Jackson was not a hero but a villain because of the way he treated Native Americans, the actions he took during his presidency, and the fact he was a slave-owner.
Although Jackson was important, he was part of many terrible things. Around the 1820s there were many major indian tribes in eastern United States such as Cherokee, Chickasaw, Creek and Seminole. This soon came to a change. Andrew Jackson thought these Indians were in the way of eastern development, using the Indian Removal Act which the congress had approved he decided to kick them out and send them west. In 1831 the Supreme Court ruled that the Cherokee Indians had the right to self government and the United States could not interfere with that.