Civil War Dbq Essay

There were many sectional differences between the North and the South of America before the Civil War broke out in 1861. The main difference was the South being for slavery and the North opposing slavery. Other differences had occurred as well such as the North being mostly industrial, and the South was comprised mostly of farmers, who sold these goods to the North leaving the two economically interdependent to one another. The North was also geographically colder than the south, and was closer to Europe so trading was easier, this was the cause of the North being more industrialized with port cities and the South being farmers because their growing season was longer. Southerners also had a vastly different population than the North accounting

The northern and southern states of America gradually grew to become very different in both ideas but also economically. One of the prevailing ideas that differed between both regions was slavery. In the north, the economy was mostly composed of the manufacturing industry while in the south the economy was mostly based on agriculture. Seeing as how the south was dependent on slaves for their workforce in agriculture it only makes sense that they would highly oppose any conflicting views and laws. Any freedom given to slaves was a threat to the souths livelihood.

With the advent of Henry Clay's American System the United State’s federal government obtained greater power than in years prior. The Tariff aspect of the plan, tariffs that supported American industry, would ultimately lead to the Nullification crisis and South carolina’s secession in 1860. The southern states who agreed with South Carolina’s views felt that the Tariffs threatened the State’s Rights leading to greater sectionalism. However, the main cause of Sectionalism and the Civil War was the differing views of slavery between the North and South. The North who had never relied on slavery, due to their not really being a need for it and religious views against it, had started to develop a anti-slavery views in the late 18th century and early 19th century.

The southern states wanted to make sure that slaves were counted in the population so that they would be able to have more representation within the government and gave the white slave owners more political clout while the northern states did not agree with slavery they did want their property to be counted (Jillson, 44). Including the slaves in the population made the southern states believe they would then have more power when it came time to elect the President. Having this power would allow them to continue owning slaves and help steer laws in regards to slavery. The southern states relied on slaves to help with much of the work that needed to be done, such as growing and taking care of crops. So for southern states

In the South, slaves were used as labor to work in the fields. Slaves were not permitted to have any rights nor were they given the respect of family life or basic human freedom. The case decision further created a division between the North from South. In the South, they enforced the idea that states had the right to control their own laws. However, the North enforced the concept of a strong nation have control over certain rights.

In the town of Pennsylvania, Gettysburg, 3,000 Union soldiers prepared to face 60,000 Confederate soldiers in battle. The Battle of Gettysburg is known to have been the day the Union regained its ground. An estimated 50,000 soldiers were killed, captured or wounded. The battle turned out to be a crushing defeat for the Confederacy. However, if the Confederacy turned out to be successful in conquering the Union at Gettysburg, the outcome of the Civil War would have been different than things turned out to be.

Discussion on Economic Developments and Regional Polarization How did economic developments amplify the regional polarization between the North and South? The south and the North of the US before the civil war were two different parts in the same country. The country experienced social and economic polarization that was from the inequalities between the two regions of the country. The differences started immediately after the industrial revolution. The revolution challenges between the two parts were payment of taxes and slavery this brought inequalities in the country and as the time went on the North grew in population and economically while the South lagged behind (Clawson, 1980).

Slavery, as many people know, was the cause of an ongoing dispute during the early-mid 1800s that caused several things like states seceding, rebellions, and even the Civil War. Slavery had a huge effect on politics and several debates, decisions, acts, and compromises had to be formed in order to keep the people in check. In the North and West, most people were anti-slavery while most people in the South were pro-slavery. These two regions were way more different than they were similar not only in the issue of slavery, but also in their economies which helped further the sectional disputes. Slavery and the impacts it had greatly shaped our country and made people choose between slavery with all of the money it offered, and freeing the

From the dawn of the United States, there were clear sectional differences in the county. The South had slaves and the North did not. The North had mercantilism and the South had agriculture. The founding fathers had the chance to vastly change these differences by abolishing slavery in the Constitution, but they feared the Constitution not being ratified by the Southern states. These differences, while at the time, may have seemed small, gave our country two unique economies.

During the time that the North had been arguing with the South to abolish slavery, the South believed that if slavery was to be abolished that their economy would be destroyed because their slaves were the only ones picking cotton and other crops but the South did not want wage labor instead they wanted the slaves to do the hard work while they get paid. Social diversities between the North and the South was not the only conflict differentiating the two but so was their economical

While citizens living in the South more commonly consisted of slaves and farmers with lower education as a result of their time spent working the land, rather than in school. Each side wanted their own beliefs to become the law, yet neither wanted to compromise or find an approach to work things out

Liberty has the definition of the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one’s way of life, behavior, or political views. This means the right to be free in a country. America had trouble with finding how liberty can be a part of the country. The fight for liberty was difficult to obtain because America had the break from Great Britain, needed to build a country from scratch, and come together as a country. America was not always a free country.

They realized the presence of slavery was endangered. The political leaders from the South saw that slavery drove the southern economy, and if the North did abolish slavery that their economy would be severely damaged. Also, the North, with an increasing population, was beginning to take control of the legislature. The South understood they need to take action. William Halcomb, a physician in the South, thought the only thing the South had left to do was to secede.

The Civil War began over the South wanting to withdraw from the North or the Union. The South and North were having several issues with each other and the biggest was slavery and new land ownership. Let’s all be clear on this issue, slavery anywhere in the world, is wrong period, no exceptions and no excuses. But if we look at slavery in early America, we learned that the North and South was the same on the issue, and that issue was racism. There were some northerners that had no issue with slavery, and some southerners had issues with slavery.

The civil war is associated with southern succession, slavery, and the Republican Party, all factors which this dispute entailed. The initiation for such conflict though, lies in the territorial expansion that Americans believed was destined for the United States at the time. Territorial expansion pinned Americans against one another when debating whether the new states should be slaves states or not, questioned the power the Federal government had in comparison to states’ rights, and put at risk the unity of the U.S.A as a nation. With a vast majority of land acquired through agreements such as the Louisiana Purchase it was difficult to decide whether slavery should spread further west, not do so, or be equally distributed. How this was going to take place led to a long and costly conflict known as the American Civil War.