Essay On Tinker V. Des Moines Independent Community Schools

I also feel that this case set an unwritten law that strip searches on school grounds are unlawful. This case not only made the public aware of specific guidelines involving strip searches but it also gave lower courts a set of guidelines to use for future cases involving these type of

The wore black armbands in a protest against the government policies during the Vietnam war. The Tinkers tries to fight the suspension with the district court but the district court was in favor with the school so the Thinkers had to take it further. The next step was to take it to the supreme court. The tinkers took it to the Supreme court and the majority vote wat that it was unconstitutional for the school to

Mills vs. Board of Education District of Columbia: In 1972 there were seven students that weren't included in the District of Columbia Public School System a group of the students Guardians and parents got together and went after the school board. Pointed out that all the students had special need requirements, where African American in the families did not have resources to send children too private special needs schools. Judge found that the District of Columbia have the responsibility to provide free public education to all students they had special needs in cannot be denied Education without a due process hearing. Work Cited Mills versus Board of Education District of Columbia 1972

A boy by the name of Ben Brewer wore a band t-shirt. Too hamilton middle and was suspended for it. He was suspended for breaking the schools policy of no wearing t-shirts displaying musical groups. The rule was put into place by principal Carter. Do too many arguments breaking out of which groups were better.

This issue was then brought to the court whom referred to both the Tinker case and 1st amendment rights to decide. The Tinker case shows us that the school may limit the student 's first amendment rights

The court case Tinker v.Des moines that occurred in 1969 helped to expand students

Dylan Zuk What rights are limited in schools and what is the school legally allowed to do? This has been a topic that occurred many times throughout history. Strip searches are unconstitutional in some cases due to the Fourth Amendment. Schools are not allowed to strip search any student in any circumstances, they have to leave it to a higher authority.

Eventually, the debacle made its way into court where it was decided the armbands are a form of political speech, symbolic speech, and most certainly free speech. Therefore, the school could do nothing about the arm

It may seem a little invasive, but schools are permitted to use drug dogs to sniff out contraband during unannounced, random searches and it becomes a controversial problem for all. The use of drug-sniffing dogs in schools is permitted because students do not have a reasonable expectation of privacy in the school and school search did not go against the Fourth Amendment, which is the right of people to be secure in their personal spaces houses and papers. While drug dogs are becoming more and more commonplace in our public schools and to maintaining a drug-dog program can cost district estimates $12,000 and $36,000 every year. Drug dog must go through a long period of time of training and drug dogs are not dangerous to people, but instead it protects people. Without reservation, we must know the history background, advantages, and disadvantages of having a drug dog searches.

Per 3 Goss Vs. Lopez Supreme Court Case On October 15, 1975 Nine students were suspended from Central High School from Columbus, Ohio. They had destroyed school property and disrupting students from learning and were suspended for 10 days. One of the students amoung them was Dwight Lopez.

GOSS v. LOPEZ, Supreme Court of the United States, 1975. 419 U.S. 565, 95 S.Ct. 729, 42, L.Ed.2d 725 deals with students that were suspended. The Columbus Ohio Public School System (CPSS) was sued by students. Nine students claimed that they were suspended without being given a hearing before their suspension, or even after their suspensions were over.

The majority of high school students are under the age of eighteen and minors have restricted rights outside of those they face on school campuses. For many students in public high schools, speech restrictions are based on the level of disruption it creates for the learning environment. The Supreme Court Case, Bethel School District. No. 403 v. Fraser, 1986 set the Fraser Standard, after a high school senior gave a speech that included lewd references before a student assembly. The court, decided that "the constitutional rights of students in public school are not automatically coextensive with the rights of adults in other settings" (First Amendment Center).

5 Brown v. Board of Education There were many arguments both for and against school segregation. One was the claim that educational decisions were to be left to the state and local courts, and not to be decided by the Supreme Court. Another was that students should be taught where they are most comfortable learning. It was thought that white children were more comfortable learning with white children and the same goes for African-American children. Also, students must be given and equal learning environment, not the same school.

In 1969, the U.S. Supreme Court case Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District upheld the right to freedom of speech of students to protest the Vietnam war by wearing black armbands. The case explained the problem that “students do not “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate.” (Student) As students, we are free to express ourselves through what we wear. As students, we have every right to proclaim our beliefs

Brian Wilson and Laura Finley discuss how they believe instead keeping violence out of schools the laws “prevent student learning” (Wilson and Finley). Regarding the purpose of the policies, Wilson and Finley state, “zero-tolerance policies are, in effect, a means of channeling young people into the juvenile justice system.” Some of the policies have nothing to do with the safety of the school such as being a distraction, and disobeying dress code. These types of infractions allows minority students to spend less time in school and more time home; time home allows students to find trouble in gangs and crime. Instead of sending students home for a dress code infraction, administrators could simply have clothing available for students who have these infractions.