However, the reason the British Government had rule over the colonies in the first place was because of the British immigrants that moved from Britain over America. Whilst other European countries also did this, the 12 colonies were ruled and ‘owned’ by the British, for example, the French had control of Canada, or at least a substantial part of Canada, like territories such as Newfoundland. However, the British, in order to maintain control, used force which went too far in the example of the Boston Massacre. The Boston Massacre occurred when a group of Colonists taunted the British soldiers guarding a customs house and threw snowballs at the guards and when one hit Hugh Montgomery he pulled his rifle out on the crowd, which began the firing
This is Shatyra Wiley reporting live from the Boston Massacre. If you haven't heard already the colonist are tired of the British taxes them for NO REASON ! The colonist decide to do something about it. The British came on the colonist property war ready.
One week ago, the colonist attacked the British. This was a tragic event where the Colonist threw snowballs, clubs,oysters,and chunk of ice. In addition they told us the British,to fire if we dared, so we did but, on accident. Once one of us fired, other British started to. The colonist protested that they were unarmed but they really had many items that could kill.
A shot was fired on either side leading to the death of five colonists. This event became known as the Boston Massacre. This fueled the colonists to continue protesting and eventually led to Britain repealing all taxes in the Tea Act in 1773 except on tea. This was an act for Britain to continue to pay the local government and shows it ultimate power over the colonies. In response to this, the colonists banded together in their common cause and in the night of 1773, the colonists dressed as Mohawk Indians and dumped tea into the Boston Harbor.
On the evening of March 5th, 1770 on the cold streets of Boston, a group of British soldiers gunned down a crowd gathered in protest. What started as a group of young men harassing a guard would quickly escalate into what would later be referred to as the Boston Massacre as well as serve as fuel for the growing anger of the colonists towards Britain. This paper will analyze two accounts of this event. One is of a civilian observer by the name of William Wyatt whose account, while short, is to the point. The other is that of Captain Thomas Preston, the commanding officer of the soldiers involved who gives a much more dramatic description of the event.
Passage two of The Boston Massacre is better than Passage one of The Boston Massacre. Passage two has more details about the Boston Massacre than passage one. The way the soldiers and the young men speak is made to understand that it was in an older time instead of just being told. In passage one nothing was really explained but in passage two it was explained better. Passage two is better than passage one.
King George III realized that they were losing control of the colonies, so he and parliament vowed to punish boston. In the spring of 1774, parliament passed the Coercive Acts, which were very harsh laws intended to punish the people of massachusetts. Then the Quebec act was passed later on, which angered the colonists furthermore. Colonists called the new laws, the Intolerable Acts. They were going to fight for the control of America, so the British soldiers were trying to destroy the artillery and ammunition of the colonists.
What we know today as the Boston massacre was when the men of the British army fired their weapons at civilians that were on a riot. Many were killed in the firings, and this is all because of taxes by the government. They were known for their saying no taxation without representation, this blew up after British taxed their people after the French-Indian war, they were taxed for paper, tea, chocolate, just about anything. In the war there was a
Was the Boston Massacre Really a Massacre? One of the most common things talked about in the history of the U.S.A. is the Boston Massacre, but was this historical event commonly looked at as a massacre really a massacre. I believe that the Boston Massacre was not a massacre at all instead it was just the act of self defense of a few british soldiers that were being attacked by upset colonists. One of the most said things about the Boston Massacre is that the british soldiers fired into a crowd of innocent people, but there is many pieces of proof that says otherwise.
Essay Question: Describe the significance of the Boston Massacre. 9/22/15 The Boston Massacre’s significance was at a very high ratio in American History when the colonies were still trying to gain their Independence from Great Britain. The turning point I have acknowledged, was that the British troops whom were guarding their Leader’s house, the colonists we’re causing the large conflict. Not the British Troops, They were doing as told but took action basing on their feelings.
These acts asserted more British control over the colonies by demanding internal and external taxes on the goods the colonists produced and received. The British sent troops to enforce tax and duty laws, attempting to thwart the resistance, which ultimately backfired. The Boston Massacre in 1770 brought change to both sides, with the British repealing some rules of the acts and the colonists reevaluating just how strong the resistance should be. Although the British seemingly began to ease their control over the colonies, several more instances of taxation and rule tipped the colonists into total resistance. The Boston Tea Party brought conflict to a new level and drove the British to crate the Coercive Acts, which imposed additional restrictions on the colonists by closing their ports and stripping their rights of
British leaders thought that the colonists would accept the indirect taxes such as import duties, but clearly the colonist did not take it well. the colonist thought that great britain is abusing there power. which lead to Boston massacre. Boston Massacre was a street fight that happened on March 5, 1770, between a patriot mob, throwing stones, and sticks, and a squad of British soldiers. Several colonists were killed.
Looking back at the Boston Massacre we have to ask ourselves a few questions; Does the name really fit the event? We all know the story that has been told for generations, but we need to go back and look at the facts. Was it really a massacre? , What was the intent of the solders?, and How many people were killed? These are the questions we need to look at when figuring out if the name fits the facts.
There were many disagreements and because of those, many events were the cause of the American Revolution. These events included bloodshed by others, peoples rights weren’t enforced, individuals didn’t receive freedom, and our country was just not yet whole. Despite of the causes of why the road to Revolution took place there were effects afterwards. When American Revolution was over with the The Declaration of Independence came into place, treaties were signed, and the Bill of Rights. Now these effects/events were amazing, it helped our country tremendously.
The Boston Massacre was a street fight that occurred on March 5, 1770, between a “patriot”. They were throwing sticks, snowballs, and trash at a group of British troops. The loyalists got very annoyed with the patriots so they shot into the mob killing five. The riot began when around 50 colonists attacked a British sentinel. A British officer called in for additional troops
The Boston Massacre is an event most Americans and British students learn about over the course of their education. In America, we learn that British soldiers fired upon innocent civilians, although this may not have been the case. British historians have referred to the Boston Massacre as the "Incident on King Street". After looking over the "Captain Thomas Preston 's Account of the Boston Massacre", as well as "Boston Massacre Trial Depositions" I believe that American historians should refer to the "Boston Massacre" as the "Incident on King Street". The definition of a massacre refers to an unnecessary and random killing of a large number of individuals.