Federalists Vs Anti Federalism Essay

The anti federalists were mainly apprehensive about the Constitution, because they favored strong state governments and felt that the Constitution

Anti-Federalists The two famous Anti-Federalists were Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams. The Anti-Federalists believed a) opposed the constitution needed a list of protected rights, b)They believed that each state should have the right to

The Federalist believed that once the Federal Government had more power the problems with the nation's debt would be handled better (Diffen.com, n.d.). The anti-federalist was against the ratification of the Constitution and did not want the government to have more control over them (Diffen.com, 2016). They were also against having a president out of fear of tyranny and preferred individual states to handle their affairs (Diffen.com, 2016). They did not feel comfortable with ratifying the Constitution until the Bill of Rights was added (Diffen.com).

The Federalists of the convention were in favor of the ratification of the Constitution. They believed that the national government must be strong in order to function and to control uncooperative states, which could protect the rights of the people. They also believed that the Constitution and state government protected individual freedoms. On the other hand, the Anti-Federalists opposed a strong central government, particularly a standing army. They believed it threatened state power along with the rights of the common people.

Federalists valiantly try to pull the cart to a bright future, while Anti-federalists impede the cart’s progress. The Anti-Federalist is the label that politicians of 1787 coined in order to lump together all folks who opposed ratification of the Constitution. These folks may have opposed the Constitution for different reasons. George Washington was elected the United States’ first president and took the oath of office on April 30, 1789. His vice president was John Adams.

The anti-federalists saw that the Bill of rights as very necessary, and federalists thought that the constitution was perfect the way it

Let me start with what Antifederalist are: The Antifederalists were a diverse coalition of people who opposed ratification of the Constitution. Although less well organized than the Federalists, they also had an impressive group of leaders who were especially prominent in state politics. In the approval debate, the Anti-Federalists conflicted the Constitution. Anti-federalists complained that the new system threatened liberties, and failed to protect individual rights.

Federalist party are people who strongly agree to the thought of the constitution and they argued to immediate ratification of the constitution. James Madison along with Alexander Hamilton favored the constitution and argued their case against the Anti Federalist which were people who wanted to keep a monarchy country. I stand strongly on the side of the Federalists. A strong central government has been exceptionally beneficial to our country. The Anti-Federalists wanted to keep a monarchy government when the Federalists wanted to see a change in our country.

Anti-Federalists didn't want a strong federal government meaning no president and practically no one to tell them what to do. The people who supported this side largely lived in rural areas. Federalists wanted a strong federal government, with strict laws and regulations. These people lived largely in urban areas. People that supported anti-federalism were Thomas Jefferson,

“Antifederalists” believe that there is no one to protect the rights of the people. Federalists, believe that the Constitution provides a perfect way to govern life in America. The constitution is a great document, and should ratified. The fundamental basic for government and law, is the concept of the social contract.

The Anti-Federalist did not want a federal government; they wanted the states to be in charge of themselves. The Anti-Federalist believed that the Constitution would not protect the rights that individuals had. The Anti-Federalist feared that the central government would make the states not have a way to defend their rights. Anti-Federalist also did not want a republic. Anti-Federalist wanted small democracies, which are easy to control.

During the time where you had to choose between federalist vs. anti-federalist, I would support anti-federalism. Anti-federalist vowed to defend lower class against the government, protect state rights, and vowed to make sure the constitution was not being taken advantage of. They believe The Bill of Rights should be used with the constitution. What are federalist you ask? Well, federalist are people that believe in a strong central government and that it is required to be a powerful government,

Federalists vs. Anti-Federalists Federalists were mostly merchants, bankers manufacturers, and wealthy farm owners. They basically owned land or some type of property and were well-educated. Most of these people lived in urban areas. Anti-Federalists were mostly artisans, shopkeepers, frontier settlers, and poor farmers. They were mostly uneducated and illiterate and most of them lived in rural areas.

The Constitutional Convention of 1787 ultimately allowed for a functional, united governing system. The Federalists argument was more valid than the Anti-Federalist 's argument because they argued for an adequate government to preserve the union, a strong and energetic government, political prosperity, and the protection of life and liberty. In order to understand why the Federalist 's argument is stronger, we must examine the Anti-Federalist 's perspective. An Anti-Federalist is someone who opposed the ratification of the United States Constitution.

These people are known as federalists and antifederalists. The federalists are the people that support the constitution. These people believe that the constitution is the best way for the country to prosper. It is the only way to make sure this country stays the way it is. On the other side of the argument are the anti-federalists.