Hitting Is Being Hurtful

Punishments and violence in child education remain as something that never left humanity since the beginning of the age. Parents ordinarily conducts punishments, even incorporating violence on it for the right cause. Moreover, in a majority of cultures and history, the common belief incites that punishments must act as the absolute way of disciplining and raising a child right. But in recent times, researchers and scholars who have conducted the study and are claiming that violence and punishment for the children, even the mild ones, are never to be done since it affects the children negatively. Using various elements of nonfictions, ethos, pathos, and logos, in the article “No Spanking, No Time-Out, No Problems” author Khazan attempts to persuade

Pathos a form of rhetoric that targets readers through emotion becomes a key part of Khazan’s and Kazdin’s argument against parents using traditional acts of discipline to raise their child/children. Khazan uses this method by targeting readers with finger-pointing and accusing parents of being the key reason a child/children’s behavior may not improve overall. Dr. Kazdin insists, “Punishment might make you feel better, but it won’t change the kid’s behavior” (Khazan). Dr. Kazdin’s statement implies that afflicting traditional punishments will only be a temporary outlet for the parent as well as the false notion that the problem has been resolved, but in fact it only provides a negative example for the child to follow. This example then results in the child/children expressing bad behavior repeatedly instead of the child conveying more patient and positive behavior.

The inclusion of a rhetorical question forces readers to see how seemingly simular acts elicit differing responses from the public, and how this conditioned aversion is ‘damaging’ our young. Professor Susan Malone from ‘RACP Paediatrics & Child Health Division’ correlates Critchley’s contention by affirming that research shows a connectedness between corporal punishment and long term health issues such as ‘metal disorders and domestic abuse’. This appeals to the reader’s sense of protection and family, maintaining that the ostensible historical and innocent character of a ‘tap on the bottom’, could have unthought-of adverse effects on their own children. Emotive words such as ‘abuse’, ‘harmful’ and ‘depression’ are integrated not only in the first argument, but throughout the entirety of the opinion piece, to evoke a sense of culpability within parents who do ‘smack’ their children, outlining the negative repercussions these actions

The issue Khazan discusses in “No Spanking, No Time-Out, No Problems”, parents need to change their own behavior, before wanting to change their child’s behavior. Khazan confronts the issue of punishment along with behavior using a persuasive writing style to share her thoughts on punishment: “Punishment might make you feel better, but it won’t change the kid’s behavior” (Khazan 25). Khazan presents a child psychologist, Alan Kazdin’s to speak on parenting interventions. Along with parenting intervention, Khazan utilizes her interview with Kazdin, presenting a more of an understanding towards the issue of punishment. Utilizing Kazdin’s parenting interventions, he uses examples to prove that; punishment should not be used to fix negative behavior.

They are more likely to rebel against corporal punishment than against other disciplinary techniques. They do not always think rationally like adults, but they do have an innate sense of fairness—though their standards are not the same as adults. Oftentimes, the sense of unfairness escalates to a feeling of humiliation. When punishment humiliates children they either rebel or withdraw. While hitting may appear to make the child afraid to repeat the misbehavior, it is more likely to make the child fear the offender.

The issue Khazan discusses in “No Spanking, No Time-Out, No Problems”, parents need to change their own behavior, before wanting to change their child’s behavior. Khazan confronts the issue of punishment along with behavior using a persuasive writing style to share her thoughts on punishment: “Punishment might make you feel better, but it won’t change the kid’s behavior” (Khazan 25). Khazan presents a child psychologist, Alan Kazdin’s to speak on parenting interventions. Along with parenting intervention, Khazan utilizes her interview with Kazdin, presenting a more of an understanding towards the issue of punishment. Utilizing Kazdin’s parenting interventions, he uses examples to prove that; punishment should not be used to fix negative behavior.

Spanking can be effective when a child is not listening to a parent. If a child isn’t following proper rules and disregarding their parents’ statement, then a spanking can enforce a form of respect that the child has to follow (Jasmine, 2015). It can be an awakening to reality as the child could now think of how their actions are deviant. Parents that don’t resolve to spanking as the first and only method of discipline is essential for both the parents and the child. I believe a parent should always try to enforce rules by talking and showing examples of how deviant actions are frowned upon.

One factor that foster aggression in children includes influences from the environment, for example, stress (Groh et al., 2014). Environment influence is associated with increased reliance of the child towards aggression as a strategy to cope. Exposure to acts of violence is also a factor to aggressive behaviour in children where many people tend to think that the children are too young to understand what is going on. It is estimated that millions of children do witness various forms of domestic violence every year (Kanne & Mazurek, 2010). Various literature have identified impacts of this exposure to children.

For many, spanking a kid is deemed to be one of the best ways to raise a kid. Since the previous generations, also known as the older generations were raised this mode, many accredit that applying the almost exact same method on their kids can lead these youngsters to learn and grow straight, therefore expecting that a spanked kid will aftermath in a prospective society with future gracefully informed and well educated adults. However, corporal punishments aren’t indeed the appropriate way neither the best solution to deal with the misbehavior of a little bairn. Spanking a kid, whether it’s with bare hands or a flat object, may lead some kids to actually rebel against their family.

I don't discover anything sadder than seeing a guardian who has by one means or another missed seeing their kid's essential sweetness and great expectations, and in this way trusts discipline is important to set him on the right way. This guardian is constantly attentive, searching for approaches to rectify the kid, which smothers his normal abundance. This sort of suspiciousness is self-satisfying - the kid who is rebuffed reacts inwardly - as does some other individual - with annoyance and dreams of reprisal, and physiologically with a burst of the anxiety hormone cortisol. The guardian then feels legitimized in proceeding and notwithstanding raising the disciplines. The kid is from that point on seen as potential inconvenience - as the

Many people think that the reason for this is easily described as “if you hold the reins too tight, the horse will buck.” Over punishing a child can be a bad thing, it will make the child want to retaliate more so than if one were to cut a little slack. However, under punishing a child can be bad as well, not teaching a child right from wrong can majorly increase the odds of the child doing the wrong thing. Reasons that parents give for spanking their children are to make children listen better, and to encourage better behavior, especially to put a stop to children's aggressive behaviors. Research shows, however, that spanking, or indeed any form of physical punishment, tends to have the opposite effect.

Even though it might seem less brutal than physical abuse, it leaves the same and somewhat deeper impact because of its focus on the child 's mental and social development. This causes lasting psychological wounds throughout

I. Introduction A. P. J. O 'Rourke once said “Everybody knows how to raise children, except the people who have them” (O’Rourke, Pg.10). Parents always want their children to be better than what they used to be when they were at their age; that is why they care about every detail in their children’s life especially when it comes to behavior, obeying them and listening to their words. B. Background Information: i. People came to realize that physical punishment is a rough, atrocious, unacceptable mean of punishment that should be banned for its appalling, horrifying effects. ii. Facts about physical punishment (sources used) 1.

Juveniles who are victims of physical abuse are studied by criminologists with six factors that can determine the likelihood of delinquency. The first thing that researchers determine is the severity of abuse that the juvenile has been experiencing. What a researcher is looking for in this instance is how hard the child is struck and with what implement. It is important to know that the implement used doesn’t necessarily mean that the juvenile will result in having fewer or more effects, but it is something considered by criminologists. When understanding the severity of harm implemented onto the juvenile criminologists measure the physical and emotional harm together.

Growing up my parents ran a daycare in(at) our house so I was always surrounded by children (the good and the bad). My parents were the type who had no problem enforcing physical punishments such as spanking, the flick of the hand, a pop on the mouth, etc. All these punishments are within the definition of acceptable punishment as stated by Oklahoma law (qtd. ---). They practiced this on me, my siblings, and the daycare kids (with parental consent).