How Does Cesar Chavez Use Non Violence

To accomplish this goal, Cesar Chavez uses rhetorical devices such as personification and many cause and effects. In Chavez's article, he believes and supports nonviolence as a virtue. An example Cesar Chavez uses was Martin Luther King Jr.

In line 62 Chavez also provides a reference to Gandhi who was well known for his idea of nonviolence and promoting it. Next, Cesar Chavez uses logos as a rhetorical device

In the excerpt “He Showed Us the Way” the author, Cesar Chavez, advocates nonviolence during a trying time is the true way to deal with struggles and injustices. First of all, Chavez explains Dr. King’s example is the right way to deal with struggling times that the colored faced. Human life is sacred and no one has any right to take violence toward another; in fact, violence does more damage in a situation then does nonviolence. Nonviolence is the way to accomplish justices morally and so much more powerful then violence. On the other hand, violence creates more violence and injustices.

Cesar Chavez, in a speech honoring Martin Luther King, Jr, discusses the importance of nonviolent resistance, and how it is used in many struggles, including the labor movement. As a major labor organizer, nonviolent resistance was a tactic Chavez used frequently. In this article discussing nonviolent resistance, Chavez uses diction, appeals, and juxtaposition to advance his cause and convince the reader of the superiority of his position. The author uses diction to convey his message of the superiority of nonviolent resistance and to make readers more sympathetic to his cause.

Chavez is willing to do something about violence and in time he will. Not very many people are willing to stand up and make a change about things, but Cesar is always trying to encourage people to make a change and do what’s right in the world, just like Dr. King did. Not only does he use personification in his writing but he also uses some form of repetition, “Nonviolence supports you if you have a just and moral cause. Nonviolence provides the opportunity to stay on the offensive.” Basically the idea of this is that using non violence will always back somebody up as long as they have a reasonable reason for using it.

The civil right movement is what caused others to be devoted to nonviolence. Cesar wanted people to realize that violence only causes death and oppression toward the ones who want freedom while nonviolence allows you to grab the attention of many in order to solve a greater issue. Chavez’s essay uses many rhetorical choices that includes appeal to history, pride, and morality; all of these help him convey the idea that nonviolence is better than violence because violence only causes injustice and casualties. The rhetorical choices make his argument more relatable to the audience. First and foremost, Chavez uses history in order to portray to the reader that history has shown violence has potential deadly consequences.

The main points in Cesar Chavez’s speech, “He Showed Us the Way”, are that nonviolence reigns over violence in power, the aftereffects of violence vs nonviolence, and what we as humans lose through using violence to solve our problems. One of the main points in Cesar Chavez’s speech is nonviolence ruling over its opposite, violence. In the speech, Cesar Chavez compares and contrasts nonviolence and its opposite to clearly describe how nonviolence is superior. “Nonviolence has exactly the opposite effect. If, for every violent act committed against us, we respond with nonviolence, we attract people’s support.”

Non-Violence Resistance Essay Remembering the everlasting impacts that Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. brought to this world, labor union organizer and civil rights leader Cesar Chavez emphasizes the importance of nonviolent acts in his article. Chavez believes that the positives of nonviolent acts highly outweigh the endless negatives that violent acts bring upon a community. By effectively implementing nonviolent acts into everyday life, Chavez explains that they are “more powerful than violence” through contrast and anecdotes. Chavez provides the basic morals of human life that “no one has the right to take it for any reason or for any cause, however just it may be” in order to emphasize the unjust effects that violent acts bring upon the world.

Throughout the speech, Caesar Chavez rhetorical choices help convey his message of nonviolence. Chavez's use of logos and ethos help convey his message of nonviolence. In paragraph 13, the author uses logos to spread his message of nonviolence. The author wants you to “examine history” and look at all the violent protests that have taken place.

To begin with, Chavez uses logos in his speech through a rhetorical question, “Who gets killed in the case of violent revolution? The poor, the workers.” The people who are arguing for violent revolutions are mostly poor workers whom Chavez refers to. Chavez uses logic to show these people that if they use violent revolts, they are most likely the ones going to be killed which for the most part will deter the people who are aiming for this. Another appeal Chavez uses is ethos to show everyone as people we are expected to do the right thing.

Cesar Chavez, in his excerpt He showed us the Way, utilizes strong pathos, ethos and logos statements, precise diction, and valuable patterns of development to convey the power nonviolence has in fights for freedoms and rights. First, Chavez provides strong pathos, ethos and logos to convey the power nonviolent actions have to change the world for the better. He applies ethos to show that nonviolence is something that people are drawn to. In fact Chaves presents a great nonviolent advocate who lived during the segregation: “Dr. King’s entire life was an example of power that nonviolences brings...”

In the first paragraph Chavez mentions Dr. Martin Luther King Junior, stating that Dr. King’s “entire life was an example of power that nonviolence brings…” This reference to Dr. King causes those who know of his impact to realize that he lead a strong historical example of what nonviolence could achieve. By using Dr. King as an example it indicates that Chavez thinks that if nonviolence had heavily impacted the past, then it would most likely do the same in the present and future. Chavez also makes a reference to Gandhi and his nonviolent boycott in India, claiming that what he taught “is the most nearly perfect instrument of nonviolent change.” By using the word perfect to describe Gandhi’s teachings of nonviolence, it further supports Chavez’s stance for nonviolent resistance.

The assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. devastated a large majority of people around the world. His works of nonviolent acts against racism motivated many, including civil rights activist Cesar Chavez, to solve matters without resorting to inhumane behaviors. Inspired by Dr. King Jr.’s work, Chavez and his union of labor workers devoted themselves to helping those in need through peaceful protests. Similar methods are proven to be successful; Mahatma Gandhi, for instance, gained a great deal of supporters because of his pacifism and tranquil methods of boycotting against British domination. Despite brutal and savage methods of persuasion slowly gaining support, Chavez proves that nonviolent actions are superior; he does so by using ethos in order to uphold moral standards, logos (in reference to the past), and pathos to appeal to the emotions of his audience.

In addition, referencing Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. in the text further established Cesar Chavez’s ethos. King was someone who was revered by proponents of civil rights. Associating an audience with a prominent figure such as Dr. King adds to the credibility in the rhetor. Chavez uses the main persona of a human

The audience that Chavez is addressing is very familiar with Dr. King, and the troubles he went through so it is not hard at all to relate to the audience with ideas of Martin Luther King. “ Nonviolence provides the opportunity to stay on the offensive, and that is a crucial importance to win any contest.” With subject of violent an nonviolent means is so important to almost everyone that it makes almost everyone stand on their toes. With the subject Chavez does a good job of stating “we” instead of “I” because of