The violence is immoral. There were a lot of violence. MLK believed that violence ends by protecting itself. He thinks that Negro cannot win the respect for white people. He believes that people are going to change when he does this. Slavery and violence will stop. Malcolm wanted to meet king but he never responded. Malcolm was wanting to do a debate but King never responded to anything. MLK thought he was being attacked. MLK’s approach to civil rights acts was non-violent , passive resistance, and “ weapons of love”. I feel like MLK is more successful for the civil rights movement, he was more of a peaceful leader. He was more careful at handling stuff, like weapons, and non-violence. Both of them are against violence. That's why they had
MLK was a black activist. He was non harmful. He also was born in January 15, 1929. He was a pastor. Then was asked to boycott for rosa parks.
The civil rights leaders used the “trickster hero” tactics by using the silence to be powerful. They used their silence to make it peaceful and they gainsay to fighting back because of their reputaion. In the parts of selma when they protested like for example bloody sunday it was always a silent protest. Even though the police were violent and injustice with them they never fought back, because they knew if they did it would show how the whites thought about them which was racial as thought of a bondage.
MLK’s views on the economy was better. When his teachings were applied to all the blacks lives the outcome was just as he said. Income salaries were increased and store owners need to hire the blacks helping them in their
MLK grew up in a religious home and uses his knowledge to get everyone who listens emotional and makes them want to make a change. Both Atticus and MLK understand emotions; and use them to make people see a great need for
“…the ultimate weakness of violence… It doesn’t solve any problems” (Document J) King raised as a Christian believed that violence was the root of all the problems and if they fought with violence nothing would be achieved. He wanted his followers to protest peacefully to the white’s unruly actions for of his faith violence was never the answer. “…we cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws” (Document H) Stated by Martin Luther King in Stride toward Freedom, he wanted told the whites that the black community will revolt against the laws.
MLK did not believe that criticism was the answer for anything because he wanted everyone to be treated fairly. For starters, Martin Luther King, Jr. was the definition of a great man because he effectively created a desired message by appealing to his
MLK knew that violence would get blacks nowhere in the success of freedom. “Thus, in purely practical as well as moral terms, the American Negro has no alternative to nonviolence” (Doc L). Nonviolence civil disobedience was the only possible way to influence legislation or government policy. During the Civil Rights Movement, nonviolence would be the right thing to
He used peaceful protests to get his word out. MLK knew that compassion was the key to success. He knew that if they
MLK and Malcolm X both wanted equality but in different ways. Martin Luther King believed in nonviolence to end segregation. However, Malcolm X believed in segregation; where African Americans would govern themselves without bothering the whites. But which idea was better for society? Malcolm X’s philosophy offers a variety of solutions for
In the speech MLK states “One hundred years later the negro is still not free. One hundred years later, the life of the negro is still crippled by the manacles of segregation and the chains of discrimination.” In his speech he repeats the saying “One hundred years later” he is doing this to show that African Americans that they have not been equal to whites for 100 years. These few words are MLKS way of telling the audience that even after the signing of the Emancipation Proclamation 100 years ago that there is still segregation. After all the accomplishments for African Americans they are still being treated differently than whites.
was a better advocate for the Civil Rights movement because he was more peaceful in his actions. I do feel that both were very important people to bringing equality to this nation. But, MLK’s non-violent approach with handling things was much better in promoting civil justice. He wanted all groups of people to come together as one. Malcolm X wanted every race to be separated and I feel like if that would’ve happened the United States would be an awful place.
Even after all the injustices done to the black population of the United Sates, Dr. King is calling for them to set aside violence, bitterness, and hatred. He wants them to fight for their equality peacefully. According to Dr. King, this is the best way to stop violence. One side must step up and act peacefully in order for violence to end.
Civil rights activists will always be the heroes of the black people in America. MLK Jr. and Malcolm X will be at the top of this list engraved in the hearts of black Americans. Neither of these men out worked each other and that wasn't their intention either. The main goal of these great men was to achieve political and social greatness for their fellow black people. MLK and Malcolm X appeal to their audience's emotions and religious beliefs in their documents “A letter from a Birmingham jail” and “The Ballot or the Bullet.”
Throughout his speeches, he spoke about the importance of violence and how it was often necessary to endure such harm, once stating, “Power real power, comes from our conviction which produces action, uncompromising action” (www.biography.com). Although these two men differed in their thought on violence, they often agreed on how important their fights were. Without Martin Luther King Jr. and Malcolm X, Civil Rights would have been nonexistent,