Leaders of the Lost Cause New Perspectives on the Confederate High Command is a two hundred and ninety four page book edited by Gary W. Gallagher and Joseph T. Glatthaar. In 2004 it was published by STACKPOLEBOOKS. This book is a collection of essays that describes eight Confederate generals. In this collection of essays the reader is presented with a new perspective concerning the decisions and lives of these eight Confederate generals. In this book the reader learns that without each general making the careful decisions they did the life many Americans know today many not exist. While each of these eight men fought for the same cause, in this book the reader will learn they also were involved with each other in a multitude of ways .
Gallagher
…show more content…
It relates in one way to the course because the course covers content from pre-history through the Civil War . In this course we are currently learning about the succession of South Carolina from the United States in 1860. I feel this book, Leaders of the Lost Cause does also align the HIS-131 course mainly because it covers events and important figures during the civil war which is a very important part of early American history. The Civil War represents how America has changed over the years and how different groups of people were treated as well as how society has adapted to these different groups and/or resented …show more content…
For example, the Charlottesville hate rally that occurred September 16 of 2017 demonstrated the still raw emotion that is present regarding the period of slavery . While I do believe that these things are wrong, erasing history is not an option. We as Americans are not able to erase things from our past. All thing that have happened in this nations is our history and cannot be changed. As Americans, we should use these questionable decisions that were made in the past by our leaders to educate the people of the present. In the book, Leaders of the Lost Cause, the authors Gallagher and Glatthaar took into account that these people at that time did not feel that what they were doing at the time was wrong. Slavery had been around since 1619 when the first African slaves were brought to the colony of Jamestown, Virginia . During this period of time it was simply the way life for persons to own slaves and it was considered acceptable. I think it is important that Americans are educated on the history of their county, but educated on how these decision and ways were not human and should not have occurred. If Americans do not know the events of their history, be them right or wrong, that occurred and made our lives and country the way it is today, how will we know how to go forward without repeating mistakes of the
1.) The author of this letter was A.G. Argenbright and he wrote this letter in 1861. He writes about a doctor appointment that he had. His audience is a Captain.
1.The tone of McKim’s address was confident and passionate. His tone was filled with confidence and passion because he held no hesitation in his statement and he said what he truly felt about the aftermath of the Civil War. “There is in our hearts a double loyalty today: a loyalty to the present and a loyalty to the dear, dead past.” , this statement shows confidence because he spoke out what he thought his comrades felt about the change from Confederate to Union with no hesitation. He also shows passion in this statement by clearly stating his loyalty to a defeated belief.
Write about the commanding abilities of any civil war commander we have learned about so far this year. Please respond in at least 300 words. In this writing I am going to be talking about a man that had a major impact on not only the Civil war, but also the process with abolishing slavery and fighting against the Confederates and their beliefs. Ulysses S. Grant was born on April 27th 1822 and died on July 23 1885. During that time he did many major things to benefit our country.
Chandra Manning expresses her interpretations in What this Cruel War was Over through analyzing soldiers’ journals and letters home. Throughout the content of the book, Manning effectively establishes why each soldier fought. She clearly defines the differences each confederate, white Union and African-American Union soldier believed and how those beliefs changed throughout the war. Manning also efficiently defines the similarities with the soldiers by using the commonality of liberty and patriotism, and what those ideals meant to each solider. Manning describes the Confederate troops’ initial motive as protecting manhood, family concerns, and self interests.
"Well, I tell you, sir, frankly my boys are beginning to wonder at the attitude of the high command toward my division... But I mean, the whole war could be damn well over soon... and my boys would have missed it. This book also sets up the importance of the battle for if the south were to win this battle It would be the battle that pulls the Confederates so much need allies. this book is great for our class because we have covered the revolutionary war for what the south is fighting their own one but at the same time we can see how important it is to finally take the offensive against an enemy in war as to pull some much need friend s to join your side.
This draws meaning about the war from their relationships. O’Brien addresses shame and storytelling and memory of the people that do not know about what really happens in war. The chapter, “ In The Field,” readers can view that the soldiers carried shame and guilt. The chapter is talking about how three men managed their guilt over
Commanders were thrown into unfamiliar relationships (1996, Chapter 10).” Additionally, MG Rosecrans did not effectively create a shared understanding with his subordinate commanders. On the eve of the final day of the battle, MG Rosecrans held a meeting with his corps and division commanders to present his plan for the following day. As he presented his plan, the XIV Corps commander, MG Thomas, stated the MG Rosecrans needed to reinforce the left flank. MG Thomas did not have adequate forces to hold the left flank against a Confederate attack.
Though it is the dream of most, few men have risen from the lines of poverty to the utmost remembered general of Virginia history. Many Americans know this general as being a humble man, “The louder people cheered, the more embarrassed he became” (Robertson 9). This man was General Thomas Johnathan Jackson, whose nickname “Stonewall” remains the most famous in Virginia history. Nevertheless, what a majority of people do not know is Jackson’s struggled rise to power and the “Gentleman of Manners” (Roberson 11) who placed his main studies on becoming a better person through a book of maxims. Growing up with his an uncle consumed with greed, Jackson partook in few opportunities of education and learning the prosperities of love.
The year is 1865, the Civil War has concluded, slaves are now declared “free”, Lincoln is killed, and our nation continues to disband itself further and further. What was the nation’s response towards the situation? To create a program in which the U.S. would rebuild society and manage to eliminate conflicts within the government, the wealth of the nation, the relations between groups, and land. Reconstruction’s purpose was to bring the North and the South back, as one nation, but all that was accomplished were disputes, both opinionated or political, therefore; Reconstruction was unsuccess. Part of the reason behind the failure called the Reconstruction is Johnson’s focus on healing the nation rather than the justice.
In the news today, a continual debate can be found about the significance of Confederate monuments and if they should remain or be removed. Confederate monuments that have been erected throughout the U.S. should be kept because of the preservation of America’s history. For instance, in the article, The Unbearable Lightness of Confederate-Statue Removal, the author lists how slaveholder monuments aren’t the only statues being vandalized, but the Lincoln Memorial and Mount Rushmore are other symbols of U.S. history that some believe need to “blow up” (Murdock). Every historical symbol can have both people who appreciate it and who oppose it. That doesn’t mean that we should tear down all symbols, but
This historical study will define the moral leadership of Abraham Lincoln’s role as president during the Civil War. Lincoln’s role as an anti-Slavery supported in the north provided the necessary moral leadership to sustain a complex war involving the continued argument about the continued existence of the institution of slavery. In this context, Lincoln had not previously been a supporter of the northern abolitionist movements before becoming president, yet throughout the Civil War, he incrementally began to realize the political and moral implications of slavery as a dire threat to American freedoms. Lincoln’s opposition to slavery during his presidency defined a major change in U.S. history, which galvanized the North to challenge the dominance of pro-slavery in the South. This commitment to ending slavery formed the foundation of Lincoln’s role as a liberator of African-American slaves as a defining factor of the war.
American history is built on affairs regarding freedom and equality, but negative issues thought to be conquered in the past have also become present day problems. When confronting controversial social, economic, and political topics in America today, the line between fact and opinion blurs. People across the country develop their own views on national issues, based only on personal experience and what the media tells them. Whether it be intention or ignorance, Americans are not supplied with enough information to accurately confront the major, national problems that lie just inside this country’s borders. Americans are unaware of slavery and socioeconomic issues that exist around them, which in turn presents a concern when trying to combat
How much of American history do you know? Black history is a part of America’s history, but why is it not deeply taught in schools? In schools we often talk about white American leaders or wars America has won, but not much history of other cultures in America. We may hear a little information about certain minority leaders who fought for a change, but not much facts. If today’s youth aren’t being taught about the thing’s their ancestors have gone through and all the things that has happened and why, many will grow up ignorant.
The first chapter of the book highlights the triumphs of Robert E. Lee a Virginian native who started out as part of the Union. Lee refused to lead a Union force to put an end to the rebellion, saying he would “not lift a sword against his fellow southerners” and resigned his position. Over the next few years Lee climbs his way to the top of the confederacy facing many challenges and even a loss or two. The next chapter is on General Pierre Gustave Toutant Beauregard one of the most unique generals of the time. A very persistent man and the first prominent general at the start of the civil
The living legacy of the United States Civil War is a complicated time in American history one finds difficult to describe. The ramification of the war prior, during and after still haunt the current citizens who call The States their home. Tony Horwitz’s book Confederates in the Attic: Dispatches from the Unfinished Civil War looks at the wide gap of discontent that still looms in the late 1990s. For some southerners, the Confederacy still lives on through reenactments, stories and beliefs. For others in the South, reminders the land was dedicated to the Confederacy spark hatred and spite.