Planned Parenthood Case

Doe was a 22 year old lady who had 2 children in foster home, her husband abandoned her ,and she lived with her poor and needy family. Doe was unprepared for another child and tried to get an abortion. But was denied an abortion because she didn't fit in to any of the categories. The court ruled in Doe's favor with a vote of 7-2. The Georgia abortion laws were violating the women rights to privacy and terminating her pregnancy.

A recent federal lawsuit has been filed by the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) challenging the constitutionality of three provisions of the Setonia’s Abortion Laws. The three provisions ACLU are challenging are as follows (McCauliff): • Law which prevents state health officials from renewing or issuing licenses to abortion clinics located with 2000 feet of an elementary school (McCauliff). • Law which requires physicians performing abortions to complete 10 hours annually of continuing medical education on abortion procedures (McCauliff). • Law which requires abortion providers to give every patient a copy of her medical records, regardless of whether the patient requests such records (McCauliff).

(2015). Gregg v. Georgia. Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/428/153? Lectic Law Library.

Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965) Facts: Two plaintiff, Griswold and Buxton, were the Executive and Medical Directors for Planned Parenthood League at Connecticut State respectively. They had been accused and later convicted and fined $100 each for violating the Connecticut Comstock Act of 1873. The Act illegalized any use of drugs, medical item, or any other appliance for the purposes of preventing conception. Griswold and Buxton had been found quilt of giving information, medical advices, and counselling to couples about family planning.

The movie we watched in the class “the last abortion clinic” is definitely relevant in this situation. This movie connects the dots from Roe v Wade, which allowed states to regulate abortion so long as they did not place an "undue burden" to the Planned Parenthood v. Casey (the pro-life movement has dramatically changed the landscape of abortion politics). It

This essay compares and analyzes Obergefell v. Hodges and Roe v. Wade cases in terms of the 14th Amendment/Equal Protection Clause and the extension or limitation of civil rights.

The Supreme Court case struck down the Massachusetts law that claimed that only married couples could obtain contraceptives that registered doctors or pharmacists provided. The Court stated that the law did not satisfy the rational basis test offered by the 14th Amendment. Perhaps one of the most widely known and controversial Supreme Court cases regarding contraceptives, Roe v. Wade still gains attention in legal debates today. The Supreme Court stated that by banning a woman’s right to an abortion, Texas violated her constitutional rights. Women hold the right to an abortion during the first trimester of pregnancy under their 14th Amendment rights.

Initially, Roe v. Wade was between a man named Henry Wade, Dallas district attorney, and Norma McCorvey, a resident in Dallas, Texas known as Jane Roe. Roe had fought for her ability to terminate her unwanted pregnancy in 1969 merely because she was not financially stable enough to care for her child. At the time, “ the estimated number of illegal abortions in the United States ranged from 200,000 to 1.2 million per year ” (History.com). Of course, due to the unprofessionalism of these procedures, there were risks and many fatalities. This did not go unnoticed by the supreme court and in a seven-to-two decision, they successfully abolished Texas banning abortion.

The first case I researched that influenced American society was the Roe v. Wade case. Roe v. Wade ruled unconstitutional a state law that banned abortions except to save the life of the mother. In 1973 when this ruling was made, many states restricted and prohibited the practice of abortion. In 1970 "Jane Roe" (Norma McCorvey) filed a lawsuit against the state of Texas which criminalized abortions. Ms Roe claimed the law violated her constitutional right to terminate her pregnancy in a safe environment because she could not afford to travel to a state where it was permitted.

Roe v. Wade There is no question that Roe v. Wade has had a profound impact on how American people think of reproductive rights today. For many people, they have never lived through a time without the ruling as precedent until recently. Despite its overturning in 2022, Roe v. Wade remains a cornerstone of women’s health and reproductive rights advocacy. The case began with a woman named “Jane Roe”, who sought to have an abortion but faced legal restrictions in Texas. The state of Texas argued to protect the “life” of an unborn fetus, as they declared it a person under the 14th Amendment (Temme).

According to the new statute, 48-hour waiting period even before the point of viability is considered unconstitutional. RRA’s argument on placing an undue burden on abortion even before the point of viability is considerable. According to the rule set forth by the U.S Supreme Court in Planned Parenthood of Pennsylvania v. Casey “states could not impose an undue burden on women who, prior to viability of the fetus, sought to have an abortion.” According to the Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982, the women seeking abortions must be given 24-hour waiting period (except in emergencies) to provide information on the abortion. In this new state statute, the 48-hour waiting period will be considered as a significant obstacle and also an undue burden, supporting the RRA’s argument against the enacted new

“On January 22, 1973, the U.S. Supreme Court announced its decision in Roe v. Wade, a challenge to a Texas statute that made it a crime to perform an abortion unless a woman’s life was at stake. The case had been filed by “Jane Roe,” an unmarried woman who wanted to safely and legally end her pregnancy. Siding with Roe, the court struck down the Texas law. In its ruling, the court recognized for the first time that the constitutional right to privacy “is broad enough to encompass a woman’s decision whether or not to terminate her pregnancy” (Roe v. Wade, 1973).

The Right to Abortion On January 22, 1973, in a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down it’s landmark decision in the case of Roe v. Wade, which recognized that the constitutional right to privacy extends to a woman’s right to make her own personal medical decisions — including the decision to have an abortion without interference from politicians (Planned Parenthood). There are many moments in history when Roe v. Wade has been so close to being overturned, yet it is still in place. Abortion should stay legal, or not overturned, for the health of women everywhere. First, this important case took place at the time of abortion being illegal in most states, including Texas, where Roe v. Wade began.

The motivations for anti-abortion laws varied from state to state. But in 1973 the supreme court “recognized that the constitutional right to privacy extends to a woman’s right to make her own personal medical decisions — including the decision to have an abortion without interference from politicians. ”(Planned Parenthood Roe) This was called Roe v. Wade.

56. Webster v. Reproductive Health Services (1989): The Court upheld Missouri restrictions on abortions that “public employees and public facilities were not to be used in performing or assisting abortions unnecessary to save the mother 's life; encouragement and counseling to have abortions was prohibited; and physicians were to perform viability tests upon women in their twentieth (or more) week of pregnancy.” It was a fractured decision that seemed to contradict Roe v. Wade but the court decided to not revisit any parts of Roe v. Wade after this case. The Missouri restrictions did not violate the right to privacy or the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment.