Rhetorical Analysis

For my research paper this fall I will be talking about Senator Jon Tester's voting habits on the Keystone XL Pipeline. The Keystone XL Pipeline was a bill passed by the Senate by a vote of 62 to 36. This bill would allow the oil to be ship from Alberta to Illinois and then to Texas to be refined and sold. Jon Tester was one of the sixty-two members who supported the Keystone Pipeline because of its benefit on Montana's jobs and economy. However, Jon Tester has also spoken about how Montana and the United States needs to work towards cleaner energy alternatives.

During a time where America’s economy is in distress, the nation’s largest steel companies increase the cost of steel. On April 11, 1962, President John F. Kennedy connects with his audience, the citizens of the United States, through his concern tone and provides statistics, in order to alert the audience about the steel companies’ unjustifiable and irresponsible actions, as well as motivate the president’s audience to engage on the increase in steel prices. President John F. Kennedy tries to convince the audience that what the steel companies are doing is wrong by connecting with the audience and their interests. In the first paragraph, John F. Kennedy declares that the steel companies’ actions are against “the public interests”. This demonstrates that John F. Kennedy understands the audience.

She lays out the myriad of ways in which the brothers have transformed the United States into an oligarchy since 2010’s Citizens United Supreme Court ruling. Mayer also details the impact that the Koch network has had on social programs – such as influencing state governors and legislators to not accept the expansion of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act – causing millions of the poorest Americans to go without health insurance. This kind of blatant disregard for the most vulnerable in our society speaks ill of the Koch brothers’ network. Their concern for the well-being of this country’s poorest is truly admirable, which will surely endear them to whatever entity waits for them beyond this life after they are gone. Mayer also implicates the Koch brothers and their allies as being one of the causes of the 2013 national government shutdown, which prevented millions of Americans from using government-run services, like the Head Start Program, which provides food and medical funding for low-income children.

Hanson’s article is very pro-military and very negative of Obama’s cuts in defense spending, which is very clear in the opening paragraph, “There is plenty of fat in the Pentagon budget that grew after Sept. 11, 2001, but such slashing goes way too far. ”3 A person with a pro-military or conservative point of view would quickly agree with Hanson. To avoid this shortcoming it must be looked at the others view it. “Good Critical thinkers, however, do their best to consider and even understand and empathize with the view of others on an issue.

Journal 2: Analyzing Arguments • Analyzing Written Arguments I like how this section starts out defining what Rhetorical Analysis is and gives examples. There are different kind of rhetorical analyses and how each are regarded. I learned that there are “canons of rhetoric” that describe actions of a persuader.

Good Morning Mr. Sale, I know that you are working to find a good niche for me, but I thought it might be useful to put in writing some ways that I think can serve the students of Swain County. AP USH. I would like to continue teaching AP for a few more years until I can mentor someone to take over the program. I believe that AP provides a valuable opportunity for our students to learn academic skills that will help them succeed in college, but more importantly, I think it helps them hone their “grit” skills. They often realize they can achieve more than they ever thought possible.

This year has been a ride to say the least… We came in thinking that we would be taught by Dr.Rice, a woman known by the to be eccentric at times but incredibly intelligent and wise. The reality of the situation was that halfway through the year we were removed from her teaching and put in a different class altogether. This change was sudden and honestly a major inconvenience to the class as a whole. We did learn yes but it felt rushed and and spastic like the whole time we were cramming info into our brains rather than taking our time to learn and digest the material.

When developing a federal budget, difficult decisions must be made in order for there to be any progress. These decisions may vary depending on the individual’s goals and objectives at hand. Therefore, if today the budget would be approved, and I could choose to invest in either food stamps, solar energy, or nuclear arms development, I would chose to invest in food stamps. Before I express my reasoning behind my decision of food stamps, allow me to explain the reasoning behind not choosing to invest in solar energy or nuclear arms development.

On April 10, 1962, steel companies raised the prices by 3.5 percent of their products. President John F. Kennedy had tried to maintain steel prices at a stable rate. President John F. Kennedy, known for his diligence and persuasion, held a news conference about the hikes in steel prices. President John F. Kennedy, in his speech, uses rhetorical strategies such as diction, emotional appeals, and a persuasive tone to convince Americans that steel companies are declining the standards to maintain stable prices. Kennedy states that the steel companies are a national problem due to the increase of steel prices.

There is a huge problem facing us today in America: the excessive amount of money the U.S. spends on foreign aid. The problem occurs when we send large amounts money overseas which leads the poorer classes of American people out to dry. This money could be used to help our children and our homeless across the country. We have 560,000 homeless people in America, while we send 41.2 billion dollars overseas (“State Data”). We are focusing on other nations people while our on people are going homeless.

Hi Daniel. From reading your post, you seem like a pretty chill person! I’m very surprised that in your group of friends in middle school there wasn’t a ‘leader’. Usually, there is that one person that tends to stand out a little bit more than the rest, and sometimes without necessarily wanting too, they are seen as the head of the group. But, I think it’s a lot better to not have that ‘leader’, that way no one feels peer pressured to do something.

Past leaders such as Andrew Jackson, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Marc Antony are evidence that society does not reward morality and good character in leadership. Society is drawn to leaders that have good rhetoric, propaganda, and charismatic personalities, and society supports them despite their immorality. Society is concerned about stability more than the morality of their leaders and will support immoral leaders in times of crisis to provide stability. In history there have been multiple leaders that have used rhetoric, propaganda and charismatic personalities to gain power, despite their morals.

I’m fairly confident that I at the very least passed the test with a 3, maybe even a 4. I think that I did as well as I usually do on multiple choice, which hopefully means that I got more than half of them right, but there were more than a few questions that I had trouble with and I ended up not being very confident with my answers for them, however on the whole I think I did alright. For the essays, I spent WAY too much time on the DBQ (I went into the rhetorical analysis time in order to finish it) and I didn’t do a very good time synthesising and using the sources. I’m fairly certain that I answered the prompt thoroughly, but I relied too much on outside information and didn’t use many quotes from the sources. For the rhetorical analysis,

Singer then acknowledges our first response: Bob is a monster. However, then he points out how we are all Bob’s position when we are “able but unwilling to donate to overseas aid.” (9). By giving Bob’s narrative before starting his argument he allows the reader to develop feelings of anger and disappointment toward Bob. Singer then explains how by not giving to charities we are also killing children.

German billionaire Peter Kramer was one of many to meet this plan with criticism. He explains how it is the responsibility of the state to take care of widespread problems such as poverty. He also went on to criticise the structure of how said donations should be given. Kramer evaluates in his reaction to The Giving pledge