Rhetorical Analysis Florence Kelley

When Kelley uses "little girl", it establishes pathos and a little bit of imagery, by making the audience feel dejected; it allows them to picture a little girl, working all day and staying up all night, in

In Florence Kelley’s speech, she states her reasons why child laboring should be a law and should be banned. In her speech, Kelley uses many rhetorical devices. But three stood out the in my point of which was diction, details/description and she evokes the sympathy towards the audience before the convention of the NAWSA in Philadelphia on July 22. As you read the speech, Kelley illustrates the use of pathos; in which evokes the audience and readers to sympathy. As she said, “The children make our shoes in the shoe factories; they knit our stockings, our knitted underwear in knitting factories.

In the book, “Rereading America,” written by Toni Cade Bambara along with Gary Colombo and Robert Cullen, Bambara focuses on the challenges and desire to teach by contras of what you don’t have and what you can achieve. (Bambara, pg. 253-259) It is without doubt that even though a cookie cutter theory is used in most schools; there will be certain social economical neighborhoods in which a teacher or adult will have to vary the process of communication in order to get his or her point across with dedication and teach the love for learning. Ms. Moore had been a wise educated woman who did not avoid the challenging attitudes of children going up in a disadvantaged economical community.

Thank you for your trust in me. Through intense deliberation I have decided. The money will be given to women suffrage, child labor and deforestation. This money allocation will better the world not only for us but the children of the future. I have decided to give $600,000 as a gift.

In summary, The Rhetorical devices Florence Kelley used really impacted her speech and the point she got across because she used the following: Pathos, Rhetorical questions, and logos. Without rhetorical devices in her speech, it wouldn't evoke a certain reaction in the reader or make them think in a certain way like it did as we read the speech. Pathos is the emotional appeal and it’s really present throughout her writing, making us the readers feel bad for children working under sixteen. Logos is the logical appeal in the speech Florence Kelley brings up other state’s laws; she uses this to further prove her point that it’s wrong to make children under sixteen work. The final device she uses is a rhetorical question she asks questions throughout

QP provided Maunica with a CBT activity geared towards her values. QP explained to Maunica that the purpose of the activity to examine the things that she values , decide what she values and how values affects choices in everyday life, and articulate the things that matter to her and why. QP asked Maunica to list somethings that she values. QP brainstormed with Maunica things that are of important to her. QP discussed with Maunica what values are and provided an example.

The rest of chapter 6 continues with the themes of fear and loss of youth and hope. The soldiers experiences a loss of innocence more extreme than anyone back at home. It was extreme, abrupt, and forever changed the lives of the men. They will never again be able to fit in back home because of the horrific events they went through. Paul believes that, “even if these scenes of our youth were given back to us we would hardly know what to do.”

Now, having stated the above you never should have gotten involved, as the problem exists between Patti and me; not you, Patti, and me. However, Patti has allowed you to say whatever you want to me, as does she, but when I say something it’s not okay. Would you allow Patti to confront your daughter on a matter that she sees as wrong? I don’t think so.

A Woman’s National Duty In the early 1900s, industrialists began to utilize child labor as a cheap source of work. However, the conditions these children worked in were both unsanitary and unsafe, creating a group of reformers who wished to see children out of the workforce. Social worker Florence Kelley was among this group and spoke at the National American Women Suffrage Association in 1905. Throughout her speech to encourage women to fight for the vote to prevent atrocities like child labor, Kelley delivers her message to her audience with the use of rhetorical strategies including rhetorical appeals, rhetorical questions, and hortative sentences.

On July 22, 1905, children’s rights activist, Florence Kelley, addressed the issue of child labor in her speech at the National American Suffrage Association in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Throughout the speech, Kelley calls attention to the harsh working conditions and long hours that the working children, especially the young girls, endure in factories and mills. Kelley adopts a passionate tone to emphasize her dedication to the child labor movement and to persuade others to contribute to the movement in order to prevent the oppression that the working children face. Kelley employs repetition to emphasize the long hours that the children work, oxymoron to contrast the opportunities of the children to the conditions of working in mills, and rhetorical questions to point out the actions not being taken by legislatures and voting men. The first rhetorical device Kelley utilizes is the repetition of the phrase “tonight while we sleep” to emphasize the importance of what the rest of society does while the children work (18).

The early 1900s was a time of great strikes over fierce nationalism, social activism, and protest. Florence Kelley, a United States social worker and reformer, spoke out against child labor and the horrible conditions that children were required to bear in order to feed their families. Her speech, delivered before the convention of the National American Woman Suffrage Association in Philadelphia on July 22, 1905, successfully improved conditions for working children. The language Kelley uses in this speech establishes herself as a leader who has the same values and goals as her audience, but also creates a sense of culpability and sympathy from the many mothers and women in the convention in order to gain their support in her cause.

Christy Wampole identifies the primary reason she feels modern young people adopt an “ironic” persona as the lack of culture the generation has to offer. As she describes her reasons for feeling this way, her statements could be classified as a claim of value, and in my opinion, it is not very convincing. I do agree with some of her points, and her piece is definitely thought-provoking, however, she attempts to prove her opinions based on judgements because of her own belief system. To Wampole, the young generation should not dress hipster, because it is not a true expression of who they are, but instead, it is an ironic way of life. To Wampole, all of the forms of art that are being “imitated” is just a repeated version of generations before, and in

The late 19th century is commonly referred to as the “Gilded Age”. A time of luxury and success, for some at least. For others, this was a time of struggle, hard work, and new beginnings. Child-workers are one group that did not experience the so-called “luxury” of this epoch. Our story begins with a poor child-worker named Arabella, or Bella.

In her speech, written to persuade her audience to help put an end to child labor, Florence Kelley employs many rhetorical devices. America in 1905, we learned, was riddled with inadequate labor laws, as well as working conditions. In order to convey her message, that these unethical statues need to be amended, Kelley uses rhetorical strategies such as pathos, parallelism, and illustration. Pathos is found throughout the entire speech, particularly emphasizing the horrific jobs the children were performing under terrible conditions and for countless hours. The descriptions of these appeal to the readers emotions, as the facts that she shares depict scenes we consider unusual even for adults.

Past leaders such as Andrew Jackson, Adolf Hitler, Benito Mussolini, and Marc Antony are evidence that society does not reward morality and good character in leadership. Society is drawn to leaders that have good rhetoric, propaganda, and charismatic personalities, and society supports them despite their immorality. Society is concerned about stability more than the morality of their leaders and will support immoral leaders in times of crisis to provide stability. In history there have been multiple leaders that have used rhetoric, propaganda and charismatic personalities to gain power, despite their morals.