February 15th, 1965 marked the milestone of Canada officially adopting the Red Maple Leaf flag. After six months of debating, separating the parliament into two, and hundreds of flags submission, Lester B. Pearson determined that the Red Maple Leaf would be Canada’s new flag, which is still is to this day. Furthermore, Pearson understands that “many in this country who regret the replacement of the Red Ensign by the Red Maple Leaf”. his speech was directed to the ones concerned about the change. Pearson’s speech was very effective to persuade Canadians that were skeptical and uneased by the decision to switch from the Red Ensign to the Red Maple Leaf. Pearson used though provoking, and emotional statements using Pathos appeal, there was a great …show more content…
The good use of information and Logos appeal enhanced the speech’s persuasion immensely. Seemingly, not all Canadians will agree with Pearson’s opinion on the flag decision, that is why the use and integration of Logos benefited the Speech’s argument. One example of Logos in Pearson’s speech is when he states, “As the symbol of a new chapter in our national story, our Maple Leaf Flag will become a symbol of that unity in our country without which one cannot grow in strength and purpose; the unity that encourages the equal partnership of two peoples on which this Confederation was founded; the unity also that recognizes the contributions and the cultures of many other races”. Pearson’s reasoning for adopting the Maple Leaf flag is that it symbolizes the unity between Canadians which is the foundation of the Canadian Confederation. Likewise, the use of rhetorical devices in Lester B. Pearson’s speech brought further emotions and effectiveness of the speaker’s argument. The effective use of hyperbole in Pearson’s speech benefitted his
In 1965 Lester Pearson presented Canada 's new flag, in light of the fact that the Red Ensign was excessively British, making it impossible to be the image of advanced Canada. Numerous residents opposed for having another banner both for reasons of tradition and they were persuaded that Pearson was pressured into it and didn 't really need another banner. English Canadians needed to keep the Red Ensign yet on February 15, 1965, when Canada 's new banner was raised on Parliament Hill surprisingly, all that they were loaded with, was pride and affection. Pearson and the French Canadian needed another banner yet Diefenbaker and the Conservatives needed to keep the Red Ensign to demonstrate a tiny bit of British representation. So the Liberals
Jimmy Carter, a former US president effectively incorporates logos – facts and evidence, pathos – appealing word choice and emotion, and ethos – credibility to build his persuasive argument. Carter strives to contend that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry. First, throughout the article, there are many situations where Jimmy Carter incorporates facts and examples. For example, he states, “The Arctic Refuge might provide 1 to 2 percent of the oil our country consumes each day.” By using such numbers, Carter forces the reader to evaluate the situation by recognizing the difference between an insignificant financial income and enormous damage to the territory.
On Canada’s journey to becoming an independent nation, Prime Minister Lester B. Pearson proposed his idea of a new flag. Pearson envisioned creating a symbol that would bring a strong statement to a new self-sufficient nation, it would show commonalities, differences, culture, and ethnicity as well as new history to be shared. There was a tremendous amount of controversy, involving our national flag: The ultimate representation of our country, our values, and our heritage. The Nationalists believed a new flag would be a great way to separate themselves from Britain, whereas the Traditionalists were against a new flag due to their strong attachment to Canada’s British heritage and its Union Jack. Nonetheless, the real controversy lied upon the
In the novel Eats, Shoots, and Leaves, Lynne Truss imparts on readers the importance of grammar. In a humorous way, she emphasizes that incorrect grammar has the potential to dramatically alter the meaning of a passage. By shooting down common misconceptions about grammar, she advocates for grammar sticklers across the nation. Truss uses rhetorical strategies such as similes, anecdotes and exaggeration to get her point across while entertaining the reader.
To improve writing my rhetorical analysis, two important elements are included, staying with the thesis statement and inserting primary source to the analysis part. Since my thesis is “The audiences of the time tends to associate themselves with the outlaws more than a decent citizen owing to the large romanticizing of criminality. The readings of Chandler and Cain fully comply with the major trends of noir genre owing to their setting, protagonists, style and tone.” Therefore, I should use readings of Chandler and Cain to explain the”romanticizing of criminality.” In the first draft, I only use the protagonist of the story “Red Wind” to explain why people who lived in the Great Depression era feel related to this noir work.
In the secular song, “Candles in the Sun” by the musical artist Miguel, he demonstrates his questioning of a higher power, humanity’s purpose and the problem of evil through simple, yet thought-provoking lyrics. Though he never states what his beliefs are, it seems as if he is wrestling through many different religions and how we as humans are to respond to them. Miguel opens the song up with a line of questioning: “Is there a God? Is he watching? Is she watching?
This atmosphere of news ideas and voices cherished an expansion in an unique Canadian identity. Canada is a country of duel languages, multiculurlism, and impartiality but it was through the efforts of one man that allowed these components. Due to Pierre Trudeau 's involvment in immigration, equal oppournities and French-Canadian
The speech that was read by Chief Red Jacket to defend the religious beliefs of his people is a powerful piece of literature that is underrated. The speech describes the feelings that were caused by the religious intolerance from the Americans. Currently, the United States have started to appreciate the impacts of the Native Americans and other minorities in history. However, a piece of history that has been quite hidden is the religious intolerance of Native Americans. Chief Red Jacket utilizes repetition, pathos, and rhetorical questions to convince the Americans to tolerate the religion of the Native Americans.
When people are not aware of where their energy comes from, it threatens their values and ideals. Aldo Leopold discusses these dangers in his essay, Good Oak, suggesting solutions to prevent them and improve the environment in the process. Energy powers many of the things key to life. As pollution and environmental destruction become a more imminent threat, humans must control their use of energy, preferably making sure not to use more than is necessary to sustain them. People who do not fully control the sources of their energy may take it for granted and waste it, however if they make changes in their lifestyle, these dangers can be avoided.
Elimination of the Flag ▪ Once the flag is no longer in a good condition, it should be destroyed in a dignified way, such as burning it privately. The Prime Minister at that time, Lester B. Pearson created a flag called Pearson Pennant, the blue borders represent the two oceans bordering Canada. however there were no any favors among Canadian citizens.
Richard Louv, a novelist, in Last Child in the Woods (2008) illustrates the separation between humans and nature. His purpose to the general audience involves exposing how the separation of man from nature is consequential. Louv adopts a sentimental tone throughout the rhetorical piece to elaborate on the growing separation in modern times. Louv utilizes pathos, ethos and logos to argue that the separation between man and nature is detrimental.
The Prime Minister Mackenzie King made it crystal clear that Canada can decide on its own foreign policy. This was completely different as in WWI Canada was forced to join the war without having a choice.
Lastly, Pearson created the Canadian identity by unveiling the new flag, bringing equality with
In the essay, “The Death of the Moth”, Virginia Woolf uses metaphor to convey that the relationship between life and death is one that is strange and fragile. Woolf tells the story of the life and death of a moth, one that is petite and insignificant. The moth is full of life, and lives life as if merry days and warm summers are the only things the moth knows. However, as the moth enters it’s last moments, it realizes that death is stronger than any other force. As the moth knew life seconds before, it has now deteriorated into death.
The flag of the United States is such a beauty. Wouldn't you agree? In this report, I will introduce the history of the United States Flag, the symbolism shown by the flag, and why there are many different versions of the Stars and Stripes leading up to our most current one. The flag of the United States has many different symbols that have a great impact and influence on the United States, but all the symbols eventually lead to patriotism because that is what the flag, as a whole, represents. So let me introduce to you the heart of our country, The Flag Of The United States.