Having lived under capitalism, socialism and communism, I admit left leaning thinking puzzles me, although I can understand it. Of course it’s all about people and the best way to organize a society. Yet the left says it’s more about people than economics and that’s that’s the first point where I start to disagree. So tell me, if you can’t fund a society, how can the people benefit?
Get the economics right and you can have more or less any social system you like. Yet, how can you distribute wealth that comes from a capitalist economic system that you want to destroy? Every Communism system up and running has an element of capitalism running within it, those that haven’t collapsed long ago. Is it only western communists that don’t understand this? On to communism.
Communism
So you introduce communism, grab individual wealth and every country bar none ends up a dictatorship with mass genocide. A lesson learned? Apparently not, as the usual excuse that it’s not real communism is trotted out and we need to continue with it in the hope that one day it might work. How many more hundreds of millions need to be slaughtered before it’s discovered that the economics of government ownership and distribution don’t work? So communism kills the very people it’s trying to help, but should a
…show more content…
The left now take from the producers to give to the non-producers in the hope of creating a more equal society, which produces the opposite of more poverty. Scratches head. The answer seems to be, like communism, if it isn’t working, let’s have more of it. Businesses start to collapse, the middle classes shrink under the weight of taxation, unemployment increases and with it poverty . . . . . the answer? It’s because those who are paying aren’t paying enough so tax them more it’s their fault. Not working, how about
Since these people in communist governments don’t have anything for themselves. Everyone in a communist government are the same there is no two-different person. They have the same house, car, number of children, etc. as well as being similar to everyone no one has any freedoms or a voice. They can’t practice their religion or give their own
While communism is meant to help achieve equality for everyone it has been proven we can’t achieve a perfect communist state. Communism first originated from the Greek idea during the Golden Age that harmony and bliss would be achieved without owning private property (Beer, "Origins of Communism"). Lopez 2 It later than resurfaced around 1848 when Karl Marx published his book The Communist Manifesto. During Karl Marx’s time he wanted the proletariat, the working class, to overthrow the government due to bourgeoisie, the high class, having more opportunities and unfair advantages.
Hopefully, Americans will begin to see the amazing impact that a communistic government would have on our economy and society. President Herbert Hoover and the United States government is the cause to all this catastrophe, called the Great
Communism Communists strive for extermination of social class and inequality through equal distribution of collective output. The government is authorized to control and make decisions. All means of production and property are occupied centrally, which is in opposition to capitalism. The mere existence of private property ownership, free markets as well as social class are abolished and replenished with collective ownership of means of production and redistribution. In due cause, the significance of government declines due to social equality, establishing a stateless society (Harold, 1968).
People tend to want to trust that the society and culture that we grow up in is generally good and that we do not need to constantly worry about it falling apart into ruin. However, we all do live in imperfect societies that gladly head forward into their non-perfections. Socialism is a theory that says that everything should be lead and directed by the community involved. It is only a real possibility, though, if everyone is truly looking out for the best interests of each other, and not looking at how they can advance their own agenda. As you may know, that is not always the case in our own culture.
The threat of a world dominated by Communist governments by the
There various different economic system view point. There people who stand for a capitalist, whereas, others stand for a communist system. A capitalist and communist system vary from differs aspects. A capitalism is an economic based private ownership of capital, production input, and production of goods and service. In contrast, communism as well as known as a command economy stands as an economic system where the government owns most of production.
In contrast, majority of the population is dependent on income in the form of salary or wage and thus resulting in increasing discrepancies in incomes. As a result, Marxism foresaw the needs of the emergencies of a communist society based on the common ownership of the means of production. Each individual would receive the same amount of monetary benefits as well as have the same access to the levels of consumption. Marxism believed that the equal access to the output of the means of production would free individuals from dependent relationships (dependent on their employers). The ultimate stage of communism means that there would be no government, no social hierarchies, and no private ownerships within a society (How stuff works).
Communism was considered attractive because it promised to promote equality and create a harmonious community of people. Additionally, Communism had nominally succeeded in Soviet Union. Stalin’s reforms had advanced the Soviet Union from an impoverished farming society to an industrialized society with great international power. However, Communist ideology would not succeed today. Modern society would not accept communism because people are fundamentally too ambitious to function within a community that stifles success through compulsory economic equally.
I believe that it is indeed inevitable that totalitarianism with happen in a communist government. Throughout history, whenever people are given immense power with little or no regulations, they abuse it. For example, monarchy started out as a great idea, one wise and powerful person would oversee and control his/her kingdom. It worked great for a while, as things were done quickly and efficiently with only one person in charge.
Ergo, if we learn from the mistakes the Germans and Russians did regarding communism in Marx way it is possible. If we thoroughly follow Marx and Friedrich guide we can actually achieve
If governments set every price, which happens in the less-used economical system of communism, they will automatically have to power to do whatever they
What is the difference between Socialism and Communism? Which is closer to Marxism? Socialism is a political and economic theory that arose in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century. It is a theory of social organization which supports the means of production, distribution and exchange should be controlled by the community as a whole. In the period of industrialization, capitalist system started to spread, factory owners became rapid wealthier while workers became poorer, so, reactions in the form of socialist thought increased proportionately.
Communism is a hypothesis or arrangement of social association in which all property is possessed by the community and every individual contributes and gets as per their capacity and requirements, which is believed to be a failed belief system since all attempts to execute it either voluntarily or by power have adjusted far more closely to the speculations predicting it's workability. Communism might have been an influential ideology among all ideologies of all time. A huge number of people existed under socialist regimes and even a larger number debated if or not it might be a superior system. However, concerning illustration, everybody knows that it failed. It is necessary to say that The S.U. has failed to give a sufficient standard of
The economic system, in which the trade and industry are owned and controlled by private individuals is known as Capitalism. Socialism, on the other hand, is also an economic system, where the economic activities are owned and regulated by the state itself. The basis of capitalism is the principle of individual rights, whereas socialism is based on the principle of equality. Capitalism encourages innovation and individual goals while Socialism promotes equality and fairness among society. In the socialist economy, the resources are state-owned but in the case of the capitalist economy, the means of production are privately owned.