“Houston, we have a problem.” That’s right, Tom Hanks. We do have a problem; the US government is thinking about not funding NASA and space exploration anymore. And that’s a huge issue. Why? Well, because in 1.6 billion years from now our star, the sun, will explode and create a black hole- completely disintegrating the galaxy we live in. Granted, that is a long time from now, but that’s not the point. What about how we only know about .5% of space? Yeah, we only know a fifth of a percent of space. That’s not a lot. And, even, the bigger number, the 100%, could be even bigger. But how will we know if there’s other life? How will we find a new home to evacuate to? Without NASA and it’s funding, we can’t answer any of those questions for …show more content…
2015 “Scholastic Scope Magazine”, I found quite the interesting articles. One, titled “Yes, Aliens (probably) Exist” by Lauren Tarshis, and the other titled “Disaster at the Speed of Sound” by Peter Ajian. In these articles it mentions the reason I’m talking to you about today: The US Government is considering not funding NASA and other space explorations in the US. Most people would side with them in saying “It’s dangerous” and “It’s a waste of money”. Granted, there is a few money-wasting incidents, like the “SpaceShipTwo” (20) in the article “Disaster at the Speed of Sound”. But, as I would say, “With losing and messing up you learn. With winning, you don’t.” And it’s true; Apollo 13 was just a boost to our space exploration- NASA found out what was wrong and fixed it, and now keeps an eye out for similar problems. Therefore, NASA learned how to keep their astronauts safer by learning from their mistakes. So, in hindsight, It’s not a waste of money. It’s actually a movement for …show more content…
And many say, “Why risk our astronauts lives to try and find a new form of life? And a new “Earth 2.0”?” (18)I partially agree with them considering in 1.6 billion years our planet will be nothing and neither will this galaxy.. But, I digress. Our research will help us try to find new life forms, and learn and adapt like them, or, visa-versa. Maybe there is an Asgard out there. Or, a Pandora, like in James Cameron’s Avatar. Anyhow, Our research is the key to finding new galaxies, new homes, new opportunities. And with technology branching out, it won’t be long until we can bounce in between galaxies to “see the family”, or make a burger from a tiny piece of dough,water and heat. And also, in the “American citizens’ attitudes on the space program” by the Gallup Poll in July, 2009, the number only increased from 1980 (41% of people say yes), 1995 (47%), 2000 (55%), to 2008 (58%). This shows that people realize how important the research
In the article, “Should We Cut NASA Funding?” written by Keith Yost, he answers the questions that have been the topic of debate for over 20 years. He states that it is predicted that in the Florida conference, President Obama will talk about the reductions that will be made to NASA’s budget. In his article, Yost takes a clear position on the
In the article, “Should We Cut NASA Funding?” written by Keith Yost, he answers the questions that have been the topic of debate for over 20 years. He states that it is predicted that in the Florida conference, President Obama will talk about the reductions that will be made to NASA’s budget. In his article, Yost takes a clear position on the
The oration was momentary; it only lasted for a little more than four minutes and added up to just 650 words in total. Nevertheless, it was concise and efficient in serving its purpose. Through the brief speech, Reagan not only alleviated the despair suffered by the different groups of audience, but also retained the nation’s spirit in space exploration: “We mourn their loss as a nation together…I’ve always had great faith in and respect for our space program, and what happened today does nothing to diminish it.” As the top leader of the country, Mr. Reagan demonstrated his support for more research and discovery, and were trying to convince the rest of the American population to do the same.
"Apollo 13" is a gripping historical drama film that chronicles the events of the ill-fated Apollo 13 space mission in 1970. Directed by Ron Howard and starring Tom Hanks, Kevin Bacon, and Bill Paxton, the film depicts the harrowing experience of three astronauts who must overcome tremendous odds to return safely to Earth after an explosion in their spacecraft cripples their mission. The movie captures the intense suspense, heroism, and innovation of NASA's Apollo program and offers a compelling portrait of human perseverance in the face of adversity. Apollo 13 is a film that explores several important themes, including perseverance in the face of adversity, the fragility of human life, the power of human ingenuity, the importance of teamwork,
Thus far NASA had primarily focused on taking baby steps to achieve what they had. While these achievement seem like incredible strides in our eyes, the amount of what remains in the universe to discover is limitless. Although in an ideal world we would have the resources necessary to continue growing at the same rate as during the Space Race, the current high costs of technology had created a roadblock in space travel. Roger D. Launius claims that NASA’s large and ambitious programs failed due to technological challenges and budgetary pressures. Therefore, the question arises; do the benefits outweigh the costs?
He states that “we’ll continue our quest in space.” He states that the disaster is not an end, but a beginning. He uses concrete details to inspire and persuade his audience. “There will be more shuttle flights and more shuttle crews and, yes, more volunteers, more civilians, more teachers in space.” Reagan adds that he wishes he could talk to all the people of NASA and show his gratitude towards them.
If we don’t explore space, we as
Even science, at this point, can only postulate what answers these questions may hold. However, as science begins to develop, the possibility of finding answers continues to create a gravitational pull like a planet may. With so many eyes on the field and a lack of scientific proof, literature and movies in the genre of science-fiction, or more commonly known as sci-fi, explores ideas of the future commonly by expressing a widespread fear. These fears can range from a fear of annihilation to fear of loss of control or even simply to a fear of the unknown. The sci-fi movie Europa Report (2013) decided to rise to the challenge of answering the question of what’s out there.
Commencing his speech, President Reagan delivered his reflections of the Challenger disaster to a stunned and saddened nation. Although the speech was primarily informative, he used a persuasive format in his reference to NASA. Imparting to the American people there were no plans to discontinue further space exploration, yet, delivering a discreet warning to NASA about the investigation that must occur following this horrid tragedy, “We don’t keep secrets and cover up,” impressing on NASA to “do it all up front and in public.” Incorporating a warning in a speech of this nature could have come across as heartless, however; Reagan’s delivery was flawless; direct, brief, and clear, this subtle portent reassured the families left behind there
(Main Idea): In the words of Stephen Hawking “Sooner or later disasters such as an asteroid collision or a nuclear war could wipe us all out. But once we spread out into space and establish independent colonies, our future should be safe.” We like it our not, the humans of the future will live in the space, and life outside earth might influence dramatically the way we look. (picture colony in mars)
Hedman in his article “The Politics and Ethics of Spending Money on Space Exploration.” discusses the appropriate amount of money that should be spent on space travel. He explains that bad decisions, low funding, and unpredicted problems, is the reason our technology hasn 't reached the level that the past expected. Many aren 't satisfied with the space exploration progress. He proceeds next to show what the space program actually does for us,like they provide us with the knowledge of stars,the galaxy and our place in it. Lastly,he wants to give NASA a boost of money to get through transition from flying the shuttle to the CEV(Crew Exploration Vehicle),if we don 't we would be giving the scientists a hard time on judging how much should be spent based on how much was distributed.
Space has helped hone the skills of scientist. By using satellite technology for space, they were able to use the same concept for Earth. Even with all the benefits of space, its major down falls are cost, risks, and low chances of reward for their efforts. Many space explorations cost fortunes with little to come out of it, making it almost seem not worth it. The risk is another key factor, with little known about the majority of space, many outliers can appear out of nowhere and can cause death to anyone that happens to be working up there.
Their data shows that the universe is slowly losing its energy and will be dark in trillions of
Many people think that space exploration is a waste of money. They think that people shouldn’t be looking to the stars and that space exploration is unnecessary. Then there is the people who think otherwise. People from NASA, or people who just in general love space ,want to fund for the cause. They think that space can help the economy improve and that there is more to space than stars and a bunch of planets.
As much as we may want to know what lies beyond our earth, there are bigger issues that our government must address. More people are affected by poverty than by space. The government must focus their resources and efforts to one problem at a time, and with a third of the UK living under the ‘poverty line’ more money should be spent helping the poor, rather than on space research. If the government doesn 't handle the economic crisis with care, we will all end up poor – but to treat the situation properly requires more funding.