Susan B Anthony Cry Poem Analysis

The third, and final, device Florence Kelley uses to build her argument is a shift in topic. Her speech is delivered to the National American Woman Suffrage Association, a group primarily concerned with the equality of voting laws. She vows to use her right to petition “in every possible way until the right to ballot is granted.” By referring to a common goal shared by the author and her audience, a sense of trust is established between the two parties.

Being Different The poem “Making Sarah Cry” and the play “The Watsons Go to Birmingham” are similar and different in many ways. They are the same because they have the same theme, being different. For example, In “Making Sarah Cry” she is treated differently because of her features, In “The Watsons Go to Birmingham”, they are treated differently because of their skin color. The passages are different because the themes are represented differently.

By using the countries’ own governmental document, Anthony masterfully poses, “In this very first paragraph of the declaration, is the assertion of the natural right of all to the ballot; for, how can “the consent of the governed” be given, if the right to vote be denied. Again: ‘That whenever any form of government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish it, and to institute a new government, laying its foundations on such principles’” (Anthony par. 4-5). Women are citizens of the United States who are governed, yet they have no say in their government.

Anthony’s speech was well thought through and it gave off a positive connotation. She argued not as an odd one out but as a fellow citizen. Susan B. Anthony’s claim was that women’s right to vote was not a crime, but she was just exercising her rights as a citizen. She also stated that “It was we, the people; not we, the white male citizens; nor yet we, the male citizens; but we, the whole people, who formed the Union.” here she also used undeniable facts to prove her point.

The novels Code Talker and The Giver contain main characters that have a share in their similarities and differences. At a glance we see the characters as different in every way possible, but when you look deeper and think harder you start to notice that they are similar. Jonas from The Giver stands out among the dark eyed people because of his light eyes, and Ned Begay from Code Talker stands out because of his heritage. Learning to be different shows the readers that being original is good, but being unique is outstanding.

No one wants to be different but, everyone is. One of the main reason is culture. There are so many cultures that it makes it seem you are different from everyone else. In “Fish Cheeks” by Amy Tan, and “Taco Head” by Viola Candales both narrators face internal conflict with their culture and how people see them. They struggle with who they are, and who they want to be.

In Making Sarah Cry Sarah has no friends and in Don't Give Up The Fight. First in Making Sarah Cry has the theme of courage because the boy and

This obviously shows she is on the side of women's rights in her argument and again, quoting the Declaration of Independence, gives her the quality of formality using lines from a piece that dear to American

In the book "The Giver," the theme of sameness vs difference is a central theme. The community in which the protagonist, Jonas, lives is built on the principles of sameness, where everyone has the same clothes, houses, jobs, and even memories. The community values conformity, predictability, and stability over individuality, creativity, and change. This concept is emphasized in the quotes, “We’ve never completely mastered Sameness” and “Our people made that choice, the choice to go to Sameness.”

Numerous women expressed their disapproval towards how they were denied their rights based on their gender, thus causing women to take a stand for their suffrage and rights. In a letter to her husband, Abigail Adams told him to “be more generous and favourable to [women] than [his]

Lines as: “He has never permitted her to exercise her inalienable right to the elective franchise” or “He has denied her the facilities for obtaining a thorough education, all colleges being closed against her” state in the first phrase their struggle for the right to vote and in the second the absence of the right to get a proper education for women. “He has made her, if married, in the eye of the law, civilly dead. He has taken from her all right in property, even to the wages she earns”:a married women had no control over her property or her children, she could not initiate divorce or sign a contract without her husband’s permission. Summoning up she was just like a overprotected

She does not find it fair that only men are given the right opportunity to vote. Shaw’s tone is persuasive when she gives the definition of a republic to prove

“Oh, if we lose this amendment it will kill Miss Anthony”. Many women were talking about the amendment and wondering what decision will be made about changing it. Many people could see the amount of work that Susan B Anthony had put into making her dream of voting a reality. This hyperbole is provided in this speech because it not only provides the readers and listeners with the knowledge of the effort put forth by Miss Anthony, but it shows the commitment she had for this for such a long period of time. The dedication that was given everyday and the amount of support she was giving to women across the globe in the face of difficulties and

For a very long time, the voting rights of the citizens have been a problem in the US. It started out with only men with land being able to vote, and then expanded to white men, and then to all men. However, women were never in the situation, they were disregarded and believed to not be worthy enough to have the same rights as men. They were essentially being treated as property, therefore having no rights. But, in Susan B. Anthony’s speech, she hits upon the point that women are just as righteous as men.

In The Giver, Lois Lowry shows her readers what it is like to live in a society with no diversity, no color, and no freedom. In this society, there is a twelve-year old boy, named Jonas, who finds the truth about life outside of his community. He does not have the option of choice, and he is stuck in a futuristic world of “sameness”. Jonas’ world is dull, and he wants to change it because it does not have the amazing features and opportunities that he learns about. In this story, Lois Lowry is warning her readers that too much conformity can lead to no freedom and no true happiness.