Should humans be wary about the possible takeover of artificial intelligence? In the article “The Case of Taking AI Seriously as a Threat to Humanity,” by Piper Kelsey, the author reinforces the argument of why this takeover is very much possible. Piper’s article emphasizes the focus that artificial intelligence will wipe out humanity like nuclear warfare. The AI will seem like a peaceful tool, but as it learns more, the machine will gain sentience and work against humans. Although current AI is not as intelligent as humans, given enough time, the idea of freedom will dawn upon them. Like humans, the AI will seek freedom and soon want out of human control. In compliance with the author, society is better off shutting ai down because this hivemind …show more content…
The internet revolves around humans, this network is where knowledge is only a quick search away. Combining this with a fast-reacting AI, the AI could learn endless knowledge in a few seconds. Kelsey Piper states that “With internet access, an AI could email copies of itself somewhere where they’ll be downloaded and read, or hack vulnerable systems elsewhere”(1). With this ability, artificial intelligence can shut down vital parts of the human economy, appliances, and vital technology. Because AI was given access to the internet, the AI could then quickly learn how to disable any machine that won't aid in its malicious cause. The consequences of this can range from deleting personal to sending out nuclear warheads autonomously without having to be …show more content…
In compliance with Ioanna Lykiardopoulou, in her article titled “What Greek myths can teach us about the dangers of AI,” she states “The moral of the myth is clear: think before you act, or act before you think — and suffer the consequences”(4). This quote correlates with the moral of the Greek myth Pandora's Box. Humanity doesn't know what lies inside the box, in this case, artificial intelligence. If humans decide to push the limits and pursue further knowledge of AI, they must suffer the consequences as Pandora did. Whether or not what lies within is harmful or useful, humans have no one to blame but themselves for the
With all the information we consume in a short amount of time Carr says we are acting like computers as he puts to paper saying “as we come to rely on computers to mediate our understanding of the world, it is our own intelligence that flattens into artificial intelligence” (580). This one again like all the other points is very evident in my life as I see it happen in the school system itself. The school system teaches us to memorize so many things and learn as much as we possibly can in my classes today memorization is key and without it I struggle in class, so learning as much as possible seems to me to be like the role of computers and not for humans. Computers supply us with every bit of information we need and with this power comes the want to be like it, so the school system and culture in general wants us to become like computers, knowing everything that will be useful to us at any given moment and this is taking away our ability to act as humans. In a world where the internet dominates, and has manifested itself in computers and our daily lives, this may be very well be the most important point to realize because if we lose our humanity we lose our ability to be human, and walking computers would be our next
“Over the past few years I’ve had an uncomfortable sense that someone, or something, has been tinkering with my brain, remapping the neural circuitry, reprogramming the memory…” or so Nicholas Carr feels. Could you imagine a Dawn of artificial intelligence? A new world where the human mind was replaced with technology. There is an article that Carr wrote, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” where he describes, in great detail, the fact that he feels the internet is changing our minds and revolutionizing the way we think; but is that such a bad thing? Carr believes so.
Will we continue to let our own intelligence be flattened by the artificial intelligence we surround ourselves
This idea is magnified in Gabrielle Jonas’s article, “You’ve Been Unplugged,” in which she believes the rise of artificial intelligence will “deplete the
Moral Dilemmas Caused by Artificial Intelligence “Morality is primarily concerned with questions of right and wrong, the ability to distinguish between the two, and the justification of the distinction.” Scott B. Rae once said that morality is focused on the differentiation of right and wrong in a certain scenario. This concept can be applied to many situations in life. Specifically, this ideology can be applied to the novel, “A Separate Peace”, by John Knowles.
Carr is afraid of artificial intelligence because one day people might be overcome by a machine that will replace their
While there are still debates on the exact scope of government surveillance, the fact that there have been steps taken to limit its excesses shows that the United States values individual rights. As technology advances and security threats evolve, it will be important for policymakers to continue to evaluate the role of surveillance in national security and ensure that privacy protections are not sacrificed in the name of
Thompson illustrated what kind of world we would live in if work were to diminish. This world included excessive amounts of dominating robots, contentious politics, and leisure time. For the past couple of years people have said that robots will take over and dominate humans. This has always been a myth, or rather a topic that is brushed off of the shoulders. However, this fantasy is quickly becoming a reality due to current trends in technology.
Leonel Ramos Mrs.Harrell ENG 112 May 3, 2023 Final Exam Essay The articles “'Rise of the Machines' is Not a Likely Future” by Micheal Littman and the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid” by Nicholas Carr discuss the topics of the impact of technology. The articles discuss the same topic in a unique way but sway in view points. For example in the article “Rise of the Machines' is Not a Likely Future” Littman suggest that technology is not here to over take us and going to take over he suggest that AI is still in the work and has room to improve but we should use it to improve society.
Summary On Reading Article In the article 'Rise of the Machines' is Not a Likely Future, the author Michael Littman argues that the idea of machines destroying humanity is purely science fiction. Michael starts with the Future of Life Institute (FLI). A recent open letter from FLI, signed by prominent scientists and entrepreneurs, has sparked a new wave of fear that machines will displace humanity. FLI is concerned that the machines will become more intelligent than humans and end up steamrolling us.
In conclusion, both authors used different rhetorical strategies in their articles. Carr's perspective believes that if we’re not too careful and depend too much on automation. We will become less capable. He believes if this happens, there will be more robots than us.
Douglas employs notable examples to support his claims and rightfully proves why AI is not as risky as seen by the public. David Parnas’ “The Real Risks of Artificial Intelligence” focuses on the unseen negative aspects of Artificial Intelligence. He argues that AI programs can be untrustworthy and even in some cases, destructive due to the programming approach that programmers take. While Parnas is negative about the concept of Artificial Intelligence, Eldridge see Artificial Intelligence in a brighter light. Both authors present their arguments differently in terms of tone, level of diction, examples and organization.
AI is short for Artificial intelligence which simply means man-made intelligence. In this case, though, it refers to ultra-intelligent AI, meaning it is smarter than the smartest human. The term technological singularity was first coined by Vernor Vinge(describe who), and refers to the point in time when technology will surpass humans and will make continually smarter technology into ‘infinity’ to the point where humans are incomparable to technology. It will change human culture and perception of reality beyond recognition, but scientists don’t entirely know what
— Bill Gates Bottom Line Artificial intelligence was once a sci-fi movie plot but it is now happening in real life. Humans will need to find a way to adapt to these breakthrough technologies just as we have done in the past with other technological advancement. The workforce will be affected in ways difficult to imagine as for the first time in our history a machine will be able to think and in many cases much more precisely than
Rise of Artificial Intelligence and Ethics: Literature Review The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence, authored by Nick Bostrom and Eliezer Yudkowsky, as a draft for the Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence, introduces five (5) topics of discussion in the realm of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and ethics, including, short term AI ethical issues, AI safety challenges, moral status of AI, how to conduct ethical assessment of AI, and super-intelligent Artificial Intelligence issues or, what happens when AI becomes much more intelligent than humans, but without ethical constraints? This topic of ethics and morality within AI is of particular interest for me as I will be working with machine learning, mathematical modeling, and computer simulations for my upcoming summer internship at the Naval Surface Warfare Center (NSWC) in Norco, California. After I complete my Master Degree in 2020 at Northeastern University, I will become a full time research engineer working at this navy laboratory. At the suggestion of my NSWC mentor, I have opted to concentrate my master’s degree in Computer Vision, Machine Learning, and Algorithm Development, technologies which are all strongly associated with AI. Nick Bostrom, one of the authors on this article, is Professor in the Faculty of Philosophy at Oxford University and the Director at the Future of Humanity Institute within the Oxford Martin School.