Robert Gould Shaw was a Union Army officer who commanded the first all-black regiment during the American Civil War. Though his life was cut short, Shaw’s legacy continues to inspire countless people, including myself. The determination and courage he displayed in fighting for the rights of black Americans is a testament to his character and the ideals he held dear. Shaw understood the importance of standing up for what is right, even when it meant going against the norm. At the time, the idea of having a regiment of black soldiers was controversial and many people were against the idea, but Shaw believed in the capabilities of the black soldiers and worked tirelessly to train them and make sure they received equal pay as their white counterparts. His unwavering commitment to justice and equality serves as a beacon of hope for those of us who continue to fight for a more just and equal society. The sacrifices Shaw made to champion this cause, including ultimately giving his own life in battle, serve as a powerful reminder of the importance of recognizing and standing up to injustice. His legacy teaches us that even in dark times, it is possible to make a positive difference if we are willing to put in the work. For these reasons and more, Shaw’s story continues to impact me greatly and is a constant source of inspiration in my own life. …show more content…
Rawls’ idea of justice as fairness, which he presented in his book, “A Theory of Justice,” emphasizes the importance of equal opportunities and equal distribution of wealth and resources in society. This idea resonates with me because, as someone who values fairness and equality, I believe that everyone should have the same chance to succeed and live a fulfilling life. Rawls’ work has taught me to be more aware of societal inequalities and to work towards creating a fairer and more just
She argues that the ideal southern man would not want his white wife or daughter to mix with former black slaves and that white men needed to have power over the women and blacks (35-36). Manning also includes accounts from black Unionist who believed that by helping the war effort they would be able to gain citizenship and freedom for their people. She argues that the black soldiers “could help dispel one of the most pernicious … evils, racial inequality” (128) and by fighting could help the black men claim their manhood (130). By including different testimonies, Manning showcases all the sides of the
Ervin Beisch David W. Blight’s, “The Meaning of the Fight: Fredrick Douglas and the memory of the Fifty Fourth Massachusetts,” is an attempt to explain how the black population in the northern states, during the Civil War, fought not only for themselves but also fought o prove their value to the American people and to prove their manhood (Blight). Fredrick Douglas attempts to appeal to the colored populations encompassed both the art of acting and speech. The author wrote about how the black people, “Love their country, though rudely dealt by” (Blight), shows how he attempted to prove that this war was about all Americans and not just Americans that are white. The formation of the Fifty -Fourth was not the first all black regiment to fight but it was the first for the Massachusetts and northern area.
Shaw was a little hesitant to leave his comrades for his regiments because he had a feeling that there would be no action. Although he was unsure, Massachusetts Governor John A. Andrew recruited Shaw to raise and command one of the first regiments of an African American troops in the Union Army. Initially, he was taking the command to please his mother, but soon he grew respect for his men and believed that they could someday fight like white
Captain Robert Shaw is injured at the Battle of Antietam and is sent to Boston on medical leave where he is recommended for a promotion to the rank of Colonel, and control of the first all-black regiment, which he accepts. In camp, Trip is caught leaving and Shaw orders him to be whipped in front of the troops. Soon after, Shaw is told that Trip had left to find new shoes. Shaw finds out that shoes and socks were in stock but were being rejected to his soldiers because of their race. He defends his Regiment again when black soldiers were paid less than whites.
Edward Zwick portrays the 54th regiment as “regionally and socially diverse,” by incorporating “one Southern rebel and one Northern intellectual, one naïve field hand, and one wise old head.” (Denault, Whose Past is it Anyway?). Glory displays the regiment as being made up of runaway slaves, however, the regiment was composed of “ politically aware, educated, free, Northern African-Americans whose experience in the regiment allowed them to become leaders in the black community after the Civil War” (Danult, Whose Past is it Anyway?). Edward Zwick uses the stereotype of run-away slaves to develop the image of a diverse regiment that came together to fight a common evil, the Confederates. By doing this, Zwick expands the nationalism the run-away slaves felt by fighting for their freedom and the Union, making it understandable to a contemporary audience.
Who was Robert Sutherland? Does the name Robert Sutherland ring a bell? You may have heard of his accomplishments and snippets of his inspiring life, but what about the intriguing details? Robert Sutherland was the first-ever Black Canadian university graduate and the first-ever Black Canadian lawyer. Sutherland paved the way for Black Canadians across the country with his immense skill and dedication, he persevered through all ordeals and made history.
Yet, with the shift from callousness and apathy shown by the white command toward empathy and trust between the regiment and the command, soldiers turned into disciplined God-fearing wholesome freedom fighters. Col Shaw created an equal environment in which a purpose of fighting for everyone’s freedom was the upmost priority. a. The final scene in which Confederates bury Col Shaw along with the rest of his soldiers sums up the story by suggesting the triumph over racism within the military ranks against Confederacy, the preservation of the Union, and the emancipation of freedom. Col Shaw overcame his prejudices by being emerging into the ranks of his own men by putting himself equally next to the first ranks and off his horse, which earned him the respect and created the motivation to fight without fear against supremacy and for
The world saw him as a treat, marching protest leader, an activist, representative, and a civil rights leader. With a different insight of how the social structure and equality should be brought to justice for all. However, some of his greatest messages, achievements, and heroic stands were not preached from the mountaintop before millions in Washington, D.C. Instead days before I walked into his church looking for the civil rights leader, but I got a preacher. A preacher who just been assassinated in 1968, he had a sermon that reminded people that color should not be a factor in human life.
We are fully armed, and equipped, have done all the various duties pertaining to a Soldier’s life…” (Gooding, 221). The blood of his fellow man has stained the ground that protected Union, so they deserve to be paid as equals to those of a lighter skin. Time after time, before and during the war, black men were refused the privilege to fight for their nation. Now that their country needs them most, the question remains as to why they are not equally treated and rewarded as others who fight for the same thing.
Robert Shaw is the main character in the movie Glory, which tells the story of the first all-black regiment in the Union Army during the American Civil War. Shaw is a young and idealistic officer who is put in charge of the regiment, and he quickly becomes a beloved leader among the soldiers. Despite facing discrimination and racism from his fellow officers, Shaw is determined to lead his men with honor and dignity. He is deeply committed to the cause of abolition and believes that the war is a chance to end slavery and create a more just society. Shaw leads his regiment into battle and is killed in action, but his legacy lives on as a symbol of courage and sacrifice.
In the beginning of the occurrence Shaw Initially only took the the command of the 54th regiment to satisfy his mother and father. Shaw
Rawls states that equality of opportunity represents, “… the background institutions of social and economic justice,” that help those who are most disadvantaged (Rawls 288). Through his own story, Moore displays how education allows those who come from essentially nothing can achieve success. It gives, “… a reason to believe that a story of struggle apathy, and pain… can still have a happy ending,” (Moore 183). Rawls also believes in the, “… equal opportunities of education for all regardless of family income” (Rawls 286). Both see education not only as providing knowledge for all people, but also resources and role models, as the most direct and effective method for creating greater social equality within a
THIS PROJECT HAS BEEN SUBMITTED BY ANANYA MISHRA 214026 ON THE TOPIC (JURISPRUDENCE) IN THE MONSOON SEMESTER 2016-17 INTRODUCTION: John Rawls developed a conception of justice as fairness in his classic work A Theory of Justice. Using elements of both Kantian and utilitarian philosophy, he has described a method for the moral evaluation of social and political institutions.
A young soldier wrote a letter to the NAACP “ If I fight, suffer, or die it will be for the freedom of every black man to live equally with other races. If the life of the Negro in the United States is right as it is lived today, then I would rather be dead” (Takaki 23). Camp conditions for black soldiers were degrading, they could not go to church services, and other training programs were segregated. Despite these conditions, African Americans contributed significantly to the war effort with support work and had some of the toughest battalions, including the well-respected 99th Pursuit Squadron and 332nd Fighter Group.
In A Theory of Justice, Rawls describes justice as “the first virtue of social institutions”, and as a matter of fairness. He sets out his aim for a theory building on the social contract idea, as a feasible alternative to classical utilitarian conceptions of justice (Rawls, 1971, p. 3). In seeking an alternative to utilitarianism, Rawls argues against what he regards as the prevailing dominant theory. He comments that in the utilitarian view of justice “it does not matter, except indirectly, how the sum of satisfactions is distributed among individuals” (Idis, p. 23). In other words, utilitarianism does not take seriously the distinction between individuals (categorizing everyone in one branch).