The South remains keen throughout the adventures of Olmsted in The Cotton Kingdom. Olmsted picks specific descriptions in his encounters to elaborate that white supremacy still exists. Several people he encounters are not slave owners that he gets their opinion. His encounters illustrates that not everyone agreed on the idea of slavery. Yet, one individual admits slavery is wrong despite owning slaves. An owner of servants elaborates that she treats them well. Everyone did not treat their African Americans poorly. Division is seen here. Southerners did run farms differently based on infrastructure. In the Cotton Kingdom, the south contains ideas that white supremacy still exists, slaves are treated differently, and farms ran differently based …show more content…
Beginning with an example of a woman who owns slaves in Texas. This woman describes how “the north talked about how badly the slaves were treated; she wishes that people could see how much work her girls did” (Inscoe 129). This lady is formally from the North. She claims to treat her servants with respect. She even pays her servants with wages for house work. The wages add up to almost eight dollars a month. Another account involves the Virginia slave trade. African Americans in this section are seen being handcuffed walking along the road. These slaves are to be sold at the market in Virginia. Olmsted in this section states this is the first auction he experienced in months (Inscoe 45). He did experience other auctions prior to this one. The south in areas typically ran auctions for African Americans. Over time slaves can be separated from their family. Even if separation occurs that does not mean that slaves can adapt to other …show more content…
On a sugar plantation, many slaves will work a hard season in October to which they will grind sugar. The slaves will work hard for the next three to four months. That does not mean slaves did not have breaks. African Americans on this plantation did get to rest for at least six hours in a twenty four hour period. Working on a sugar plantation is a lot of work. Aside from Olmsted’s writing on slaves, Jennie Kendrick’s slave narrative from Georgia, describes that her plantation worked with cotton and corn (Project 1941). African Americans here wore clothes that is made on the plantation. The main aspect of this narrative is that slaves working in the fields came in around noon to eat in a kitchen. They got to eat food during the day. That is unlike the African Americans mentioned before. These examples of slavery provide information that slave’s may receive other opportunities than those on other plantations. It depends on how the work needs to be done. On the Moore plantation, where Jennie grew up there is leisure time to experience. Southern Cotton Plantations did not always end up that way. Masters on other plantations may not be that lenient on free time. In conclusion, slavery in the south still includes white supremacy, treatment of slaves, and how plantations worked. The different thoughts on slavery mentions that several people did not agree that slavery is a curse to the country. There is the treatment
This first raises the question if these lower class white women had any role on the plantation whatsoever, other than the blockade between overseer-slave relations. Studies have shown that the work of these women exceeds the expectations of normal housework, expanding to include producing the goods that the family needs to survive. Despite doing the skills and good work acquired by these women, the planters and even sometimes the slaves would degrade these women. Often times, the owners of the plantations saw the overseers as troublesome lowlifes and their wives and children were just extra mouths to feed. There was a level of inequality between the plantation owners and the labor managers, despite the fact that both were white.
This book would be an important addition to history classes since most focus on the oppression of the slaves, but most did not realize that the subjugation went further up the chain of command. Most people believed that women in the south had the perfect lives, living in a charming mansion, with the perfect husband, and slaves to complete all her chores. By recommending this book to others, their eyes will be opened to a piece of history that has been lost, it contributes everything one would need to know the extent of the situation, leaving nothing to the
Slavery had many faces but the underlying concept remained beneath each of these different faces. No matter how kindly a slave was treated by their master, they were still considered property and subhuman. While some owners beat and mutilated their slaves, others were more "kind" and treated their slaves humanely. Nonetheless, they still owned slaves and believed the slaves were property. Famous former slaves, such as Frederick Douglass, enlightened people as to how slaves were treated by their masters.
Many slave owners treated African Americans like animals. As an example, they starved their slaves while they gave all the food to their visitors. It is cruel how they didn’t save even a bread for each of their slaves. Not to mention, African Americans had to sleep on a sheet instead of a bed and that is all they had to sleep. The clothing they had was also very little and poor.
The color of their skin? Before reading the book Kindred, the Slave Diary, and watching the movie Roots I would have told you it must have been pretty tough being a slave but now with the knowledge I have and the brutality I witnessed I would tell you that I have no idea how miserable it must have been but that my heart breaks for all of those who suffered and still are suffering from slavery. I cannot tell anyone that I know exactly what it feels like to be treated in such a disgraceful manner but through Kunta Kinte, Anita Ross, Harriet Jacobs and Dana I get a glimpse of the ongoing pain and suffering they endured as well as all the others slaves. Determination and a willingness to fight against all odds are what lead Kunta Kinte, Anita Ross, Harriet Jacobs and Dana to
This book revolved around an era where the three structures focused very seriously on slavery. The structure, in the south especially, was agricultural; this agriculture, which moved from a focus on tobacco before the Revolutionary War to cotton based agriculture after the war. In both cases, slaves were the cornerstone of productivity. The infrastructure was still a government by discussion; however there was the beginning of a rift of opinion on the necessity of slavery. This rift found its roots in the superstructural level: the North felt that slavery was obsolete and cruel, while the South believed that slavery was economically necessary and morally inconsequential.
My paper is about southern race relations in the mid 1900s. People in the 1900s treated African-Americans with much less respect then they did to white people. Like in the book, which takes place in the mid 1900s, it shows how people did treat blacks; they had them in different areas of town, they had to go to different churches and school, and they also just disrespected blacks. Like in the book with Atticus, there was people who didn’t like the way people were treating blacks, and tried to change it (Martin Luther King Jr.). In 1619, People brought African-American people to the Americas, sold them as slaves, and so began race problems.
Fox-Genovese argues that southern slave-owning women and their slaves lived and worked within the close proximity and the most intimate of spaces, the home, and that it encompassed the “basic unit of a unique form of modern society that no familiar theoretical categorization captures” (pg 57). She argues that to look at the southern life through the northern vantage point would yield an inaccurate interpretation of the relationships that formed the basis of southern
She was not always a Northerner, but she had grown up on a plantation in Virginia with over 200 slaves. Her father farmed tobacco and cotton when she was little. When her mother died, she was raised by slaves and had always been particularly fond of them. Over the ten years in their company she had come to love and trust them, even more than she trusted her father. They had been honest and kind and gave freely what little they had.
This misconception is derived from the slave owner protecting their public persona as considerate slave holders. Frederick Douglass, a former slave in Virginia, provided a brief portrayal of the urban slave holder’s attitudes: The treatment that urban slaves received gave some slaves the false perception that they were better than those enslaved on plantations as Abby Mishow, a former slave in Charleston, South Carolina, indicated: On the contrary, behind closed doors some slave owners in urban areas subjected their slaves to the same cruel and neglectful treatment as they did to those enslaved on farms and plantations. Mattie Jackson, a former slave in St. Louis, Missouri, asserted that while her mother and siblings had fared well upon being sold, her circumstances were not the
That divided the nation. Most slaves lived and worked on small plantation farms. On plantations they enforced the “Gang system” which was used to involve a continuous day of work. Slaves have jobs like Carpenters, Coopers,
Though he never understood how slaves, who did not have the best of education, if any, where able to keep up with the events going on around them, though he did remember overhearing his mother and other people speaking about the matter once “I now recall the many late-at-night whispered discussions that I heard my mother and the other slaves on the plantation indulge in. These discussions showed that they understood the situation, and that they kept themselves informed of events by what was termed the "grape-vine" telegraph.” (8) He couldn’t remember a time during his childhood when his entire family sat down to the table together, and the family was able to eat together in a civilized manner. Most often, their meals were “a piece of bread here and a scrap of meat there. It was a cup of milk at one time and some potatoes at another.
(Yetman 32). This shows how some slaves were viewed as family because after being freed their former owners came looking for them telling them to come back home and live with them and some were very happy to go back. This also gives insight on how whites treated their slaves and how African Americans viewed their owners. Though this shows a more or less “bright” outcome there are many dark outcomes as to be expected from slavery. Overall VOICES FROM SLAVERY shows how not all African Americans hated slavery but they greatly depended on the owner.
Slaves either started working as a slave extremely young or they were taken from their homes in their teenage years (Boston). Slaves worked for about twelve hours a day and did not have a warm, comfortable bed to sleep in at night. Frederick Douglass, an abolitionist who escaped slavery himself said, “A city slave is almost a freeman, compared with a slave on the plantation” (Boston). A freeman is a person who is entitled to full political and civil rights. Slaves on a plantation had it harder than those who were slaves in the cities (Boston).
In the novel, Chains, slave’s life was was very different depending on where they lived or worked. The life of a slave that worked in plantations was very different from one whom worked in the city or on small farms. For example, if the slave worked on a small farm, then they would have to put in a lot of work in the heat as opposed to working in the city. But, all slaves were still treated badly.