Paid There is a long on-going debate on whether college athletes should be paid. There have been many articles, essays, papers, and debates about the issue. I think that college athletes should be paid because as athletes they won’t have enough time in their sports season to get a normal job. Scholarships aren’t as secure and beneficial to the students as they used to be. Athletes should be able to receive a portion of the money that comes from merchandise with their image. Finally, they and are not offered medical or death insurance. Allowing these students to be paid can help benefit their future sports and academic career. During a regular sports season, college athletes are focused on practice and school because of this they don’t have the time to be able to get a regular job to make money of their own. These students often go to colleges and universities that offer them scholarships for sports. The …show more content…
These students are liable to injury at practice and during games. They should have some form of insurance to protect them. If these students were paid, they would have the money to pay for any minor injuries that were inflicted on them from the hours of practice. In an article the Los Angeles Times wrote about the topic of paying college athletes they used the scenario that other students who have jobs on campus’ such as a librarian that if they were to be injured they are covered by workers’ compensation or campus insurance. These student athletes raise thousands upon thousands of dollars for campuses each year through merchandise, games, and any extra luxuries that the sports generate. “In addition to offering basic security for players, requiring the NCAA to insure them might also encourage development of safety measures.” (Times, 575). Either paying athletes or offering them insurance will create less problems for the school when students are
Are you a students-athlete in need of compensation from the sport you love? There is a possibility of getting this kind of money from playing certain levels in sports. Paying college athletes has been and always will be an ongoing argument. I divine that paying these athletes will help students financial futures, help the costs of abrasions to the students themselves, and bring in prodigious amounts of money. Initially, paying college athletes will help them create a sense of financial awareness.
I think college athletes should get paid while they’re still in college. College athletes should get paid because they play for that school, unheeding the dangers of getting hurt. Kevin Ware from Louisville broke his leg in a game. Luckily, he came back from the injury, but others might not be that lucky. Devon Walker, safety for Tulane University, was playing Tulsa University when he hit a player, causing him to be paralyzed.
College athletes should get paid Have you ever wondered why there is a major crisis with fees and expenses in college? Many people suffer with debt issues and sometimes have to drop out. Some people have even dropped out of their team because it's a waste of time and without having some type of help there's no energy enough for you to try your best. Within College expenses, they have gotten higher and higher over time. First off, college athletes have to have a way to pay for school.
College athletes should receive compensation for their efforts because of the serious risks involved, the time the athletes put into it, and if the college is making money off these students they should financially benefit from it. There are serious risks involved with playing any sport. Players can get injured from their sports. The physical risks involved in a sport are extensive. Many athletes have career-ending injuries during college.
If college athletes were getting paid, more than likely other students would have to pay more in tuition and in other fees. Athletes getting paid would create the misunderstanding that getting an education would be less important than trying to get involved in a sport. The importance of academics would go straight down the drain. Along with all of these points, the majority of college athletes already technically get paid through scholarship money.
College Athletes Should Be Paid! Are you aware that despite colleges earning a substantial amount of money from sporting events, student-athletes are not compensated? Many college athletes are not compensated for their hard work. Recently, there have been controversies about whether or not college athletes should be paid. Some people assert that college athletes should not be paid because paying them will alter the atmosphere of the game.
“The NCAA recently voted to allow schools to begin compensating its student-athletes for their entire cost of attendance” (Entman). This is a big push for college athletes. ; College athletes should be paid; therefore, they deserve to receive the amount of money they work for. College athletes work hard while in class, and then
College athletes put in a lot of time, effort, and work into the sport they’ve played since they were young, but they aren’t getting paid for it. These student athletes deserve to be paid because they put in countless hours of hard work and balance sports with school work. The first reason athletes in college do deserve to be compensated is because they don 't have time to fit in work with a school and athletic schedule. College athletes don’t have time to get a real job. Student athletes have a very busy schedule, they don’t have time to fit in a job.
College athletes take many risks and make personal sacrifices in order to bring in revenue for their school, for this reason, they should be paid employees. The first reason in why college athletes should be paid is that college athletes take many risks. Depending on the scholarship, if an athlete is injured and unable to play they can lose their
If colleges began to pay their athletes, then they could build a bad reputation for being mercenary and lose their educational reputation If they are allowed to play, then it can be financially detrimental to the college because there are many flaws in the system. College athletes should not be compensated for their actions regarding athletic activities, no matter what sport or level they compete on. The idea that college athletes should or shouldn 't be paid
As we all know, college can be very expensive. With the scholarships and grants, college student-athletes can go to school for free and get their day-to-day needs such as food, housing, clothes, etc. Ackerman and Scotts, purpose is to show that college is a learning experience and with the help of college sports, the student-athletes will have a chance to grow and be successful in life rather than being exploited. However, critics believe that college student-athletes should be paid salary, like professional athletes, because they want people to see the “athletes are the rule, not the expectation” (par 11). They want the audience to think that it’s a rule for student-athletes to go play pro after two years, will no expectation.
Should college athletes be paid? Annotated Bibliography Benedykiuck, Mike. “The Blue Line: College athletes should be paid.” Dailyfreepress.
For example, if it wasn’t for basketball players, Gonzaga University would need to spend a lot more money on building a name recognition to students not located on the West. Everyone has their own opinion, but mine is that college athletes should be paid. The amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school are only three of a myriad of reasons why they should be paid. These athletes are not only students, but employees to their universities. They are a core member of many university’s marketing team.
Should college athletes be paid? I think they should. I found three main reason why other people and myself think that college athletes deserve pay. One, you can just pay the sports that produce the most revenue. Two, these student athletes put in lots of work and even sometimes have to miss class to go to the sports event.
The argument made by these two professors state that Division 1 players qualify as employees under Federal Labor Laws. Since players are under this law, the McCormick’s feel players should get financially compensated due to the physical rigors and balance education simultaneously (Cooper, 2011). It’s unbelievable how this couple thinks Division 1 athletes should get paid. The privilege to attend a university that is costly on full scholarship should be more than enough. Furthermore, student-athletes received stipends as an allowance assist with their livelihood.