Introduction
The career field of Law has been greatly impacted by technology over the years. The career field of Law would include Lawyers, Clerks, Judges, and different types of Law Enforcement as well as many other jobs. All of these jobs have changed how they conduct their business over time due to technology. Lawyers have changed their work models due to technology. Clerks have changed how they file and process documents. Judges have become more aware of crimes committed with new technology. Law enforcement now uses technology in the apprehension of criminals. Technology has played a substantial part in modernizing the field of law.
Evolution of Technology in Trial Law The career interest I intend to pursue is to become a Trial Lawyer.
…show more content…
Public Defenders are court appointed trial attorneys who usually represent the poor and underprivileged. Public Defenders face an ethical dilemma due to the fact that they are being overworked with massive caseloads. A Trial Attorney has a responsibility to their client to give them the best quality of representation that they can offer. If a Public Defender is forced by the state department to take on a massive caseload then they will most likely be able to offer the adequate level of quality their client deserves (Baxter, 2012). The use of technology could help to solve this problem with the integration of technology in the courtroom. If computer monitors and printers were added into courtrooms as well as witness monitors then the courts would cut down on time and become more streamlined. The short term outcome of this would be quicker cases by cutting out time wasting activities such as waiting for papers to reach the bench or for the client to approach the bench. The long term outcome would be that Public Defenders would now be better able to take on heavy workloads due to extra time they will have in their schedule due to shorter time needed for individual cases. The desired outcome is better representation for all clients and not just the indignant clients. An undesired outcome would be the need for technicians to maintain courtroom equipment. Clerks would love …show more content…
The Job was located under Monster.com. The location of the job is in Norfolk Virginia. This job is a full time job working for the state department. The salary is not specified and requirements are to have significant criminal defense experience and to be a licensed attorney. I do not think I have the requirements for this job where I will be representing indigent clients on death row. I do not have the trial experience or the education. The technology requirement for this job is to be literate with Microsoft Office and Spreadsheets. This job would not fall under STEM because it does not use the necessary amount of technology or mathematics to be considered STEM. I find the job attractive because it is about helping represent the underprivileged and because it is very high stakes because capital punishment is on the
My attached resume provides additional information about my qualifications and community experiences. I would appreciate the opportunity to meet with you and further discuss how my qualifications are an ideal match for the position. Please feel free to contact me at (714) 955-8118. Thank you for your time and consideration.
The United States Criminal Justice system has a unique way of approaching and handling criminal trials. In criminal trials there are important court room members with specific roles and certain court room procedures that must be followed. The court room members include the jury, the judge, the prosecution, and the defense. Some of the procedures of a criminal trial are arraignment, preliminary hearing, the trial itself, opening statements, direct examination, cross examination, closing arguments and the verdict. Each court room member’s goal is to fulfill their responsibility and to help justice be served.
CSU Long Beach, Political Science Department at Long Beach Municipal and Superior Court, Long Beach CA Legal Apprentice and Researcher 1996-1997 • Conducted political research on the public defender system and provided analysis by viewing, discussing and summarizing judicial procedure(s) and Trial Judge, District Attorney, Public Defender to gain a better understanding of the efficacy of the public defender system on criminal proceedings in Long Beach and its need for key structural improvement. Accomplishments: After reading Gideon’s Trumpet as a context by which to explore and analyze the public defenders system and the social injustices that often occur, as reference by the main characters denial of his legal right to receive legal counsel in his defense in a Florida court; I related my reading and first hand experiences, observations and findings on the efficacy or lack thereof of the Public Defenders system to supervising professors at the CSU Long Beach, Department of Political Science in an attempt to suggest needed improvements to the criminal justice and judicial system. CSU Long Beach, Office of Affirmative Action - Long Beach,
David Feige’s Indefensible: One Lawyer’s Journey nto the Inferno of American Justice invites people from all walks of life to a second hand experience of the criminal justice system hard at work. What is most interesting about Feige’s work is its distinct presentation of the life of a public defender in the South Bronx. Instead of simply detailing out his experiences as a public defender, Feige takes it a step further and includes the experiences of his clients. Without the personal relationships that he carefully constructs with each of his defendants, Feige would not be able to argue that the criminal justice system is flimsy at best, decisions always riding on either the judge’s personal attitudes or the clients propensity towards plea bargaining.
This means that those charged with lesser crimes are pushed to the back of their caseloads. Public defenders are overworked and underpaid meaning that many times they cannot do their job to the best of their abilities. Sadly because of this system, many of their clients sit in holding cells for months or years, awaiting for a trial that is continually pushed off by their attorney. While the system of free public defenders seemed like an equal foot for criminal clients to stand on in the justice system, it is in reality a very messy and disorganized system that overlooks those without the most pressing issue. Gideon V. Wainright was a landmark case, arguably one of the most important cases of the sixties.
Plea bargains are negotiations between the prosecutor and the criminal defendant. In this negotiation, the criminal defendant consents to pleading guilty. When the criminal defendant takes the guilty plea, he or she is able receive reductions in their charges or sentences. There are pros and cons of plea bargains, but these bargains can be doing more harm than good. Plea bargaining is a simple process but can have long term repercussions.
More people get incarcerated for non-violent crimes and crimes caused by mental illnesses or drug abuse (Webb, 2009) and because these people get put in regular prisons, instead of in mental health facilities or facilities to help against drug addiction, where they could be treated to further prevent crimes driven by their illness (Webb, 2009), the prisons get overfilled and cannot hold the more ‘important’ prisoners that needed to be locked away from the public. A strong link of the criminal justice process is that the system tries to keep it fair for everyone. Every defendant has the right to an attorney so they can be defended properly and fairly and “Only judges who are adequately informed about a case can effectively control the proceedings and examine evidence” (Tochilovsky, 2002) It is also important for the criminal justice system that those involved show discretion and although this is not always the case, discretion by the judges, police, etc.
How Things Have Changed: Why did the law change? Well to start off the world today is very different from what it used to be. We're now concerned about burglars who not only break into houses but also into computer systems. This required a modern update to keep up with our tech-centric lives. Additionally, protecting personal property, even when it's not in our homes, became a priority.
Nils Christie’s view on modern law is that due to specialization, victims have lost the right to participate in their trials. Lawyers are becoming too involved in cases, taking conflicts away from parties and turning them into property. Christie states there there is less attention focused on the effects on the victim and more focus on the criminal’s background. Christie also states that getting a court to function is difficult while there are specialists present. According to Christie, parties become uneasy with handling their own social conflicts where they know there are professionals present who they believe can do a better job.
This remarkable courthouse only hosted approximately seven trials in its first year and since then has dropped even lower (Dzur, 2013). The early 20th century was the last time a jury was considered the normal process for dealing with criminal cases, and now the plea deal is king (Dzur, 2013). Simple fact is, today juries hear only a very few cases across the nation (Dzur, 2013). High-ranking members working in the justice system fear that the competence of a jury today is declining with the scientific evidence that is now available (Dzur, 2013). The statistics seem to support this fear.
Improve access to justice and case management during pre-trial detention. 5. Develop and implement constructive non-custodial
C. (2017, March 02). Trial judge offers new theory on death of Casey Anthony's daughter, Caylee Anthony. Retrieved January 24, 2018, from https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trial-judge-offers-new-theory-on-death-of-casey-anthonys-daughter-caylee-anthony/ This resource will give detailed information about what Judge Belvin thought happen to Caylee Anthony. They provide information on his opinion just by the evidence that presented during the time of the trial.
This paper is to help show how sometimes judges can be Bias or inherent in the amount of bail set and other restrictions for pre-trial release while showing the concept of bail what can be done to prevent arbitrary and potentially prejudiced decisions from being made in the courtroom when it comes to bail by the judge, Also discuss the pros and cons of private vs. public defense. Introduction This paper will show the pros and cons of pre-release and define pre-trail release and bond, arbitrary. bond types also look into the factors of bail amounts a judge looks at to determine how much the defendant’s bail is and a few ways to prevent arbitrary and potentially Prejudice decisions from being made in the court by judges.
Technology use has changed the legal field, from law firms, to the courtroom operation and document management. Paralegals are becoming more proficient in using Word, spreadsheet, presentations, database to track clients, and cases, but also learning to use more of legal research software database applications design for certain areas of law. Using technology in a law firm can help deliver effective legal advice and services, for example a law firm can using Lexis Nexus or Westlaw, in finding case law for a certain case, instead of the traditional research books, it saves the attorney substantial amount of time while getting other cases done. I work at an Immigration law firm, and we use the legal application INS zoom for documents, and populating
Hannah Arendt born in Germany, worked as a U.S. political writer and philosopher. Her works were mostly related to political philosophy. In one of her work, “The Human Condition” Arendt suggests a three-way partition between the human activities as labor, work, and action. The activities have been arranged in hierarchal importance. Labor corresponds to that activity which are undertaken for fulfillment of biological necessities of human existence.