The Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act Analysis

Cha makes it obvious that she is in support and on the defensive side for the school lunch program. I believe that Cha does this because she is able to see that creating a lunch program that is affordable, efficient and appetizing to all students, is nearly impossible and she is doing her very best show that efforts are being expended to do this. Cha writes of the studying of students served lunch and the actual intake. Many results were showing that students were choosing not to eat the foods that students are lacking the most. Cha has the most common stasis of evaluation.

Students learn how to interact with other kids their age, be respectful, make new friends, and overall mature to become the best they can be, while also being prepared for life after school. In order for these students to not only learn the school subjects that are stepping stones for the rest of their academics, careers, and future jobs. Students need other time in school to work on these other important skills, lunch is this exact time. In order to maximize students conversing and making connections, all students should see each other as equals and companions. A problem with the school lunch system currently is that “Students who qualify for free school meals often receive different meals or are forced to stand in different lines, which can lead to stigma and abuse from their peers” (Besser and Bussell).

Over 30.3 million kids in the U.S. alone eat free or reduced price school lunches, these lunches were meant to keep kids full and happy through the day but that might not be the case anymore. Millions of kids go to school every day and a big part of the day is when the students are able to eat lunch and socialize, but a problem not many people think about at school plagues the lunch room. Schools offer many different assortments of foods, including the high processed and fatty foods and snacks that not only can cause health problems, but can cause kids to feel sluggish throughout the day. School lunches need to include more organic and locally grown options instead of the highly processed foods currently served, because the it does not provide

Another solution that could be implemented to solve school lunch debt is by providing free meals. By providing free meals to students, they are able to have the exact meals as their peers, parents will not have to worry about finding the funds to pay for school lunches, moreover students are having their nutritional needs met, which is essential to their development. Despite how simple this may sound, this can easily impact local businesses as a result of a decline of how much product that is being sold. According to an article written by Denise-Marie Ordway, “Food purchases decline by an estimated $11 per month, on average, among households with children located in the same zip code as the school offering universal free meals” (Ordway, Section 16). Due to the fact that it wastes food, declines sales in grocery stores, and costs more taxes, this is another solution that is not the best for this particular issue, but can also be used as a potential solution in the

A recent study found that children who regularly ateschool lunches were 29 percent more likely to beobese than their peers who brought lunch fromhome. Health science has advanced greatly since theinception of the National School Lunch Program in1946. When a 2008 Institute of Medicine committeecomprising 14 child-nutrition experts examined dataon the content of school lunches in the UnitedStates, its findings were stark. The updated standards aligned school meals withthe 2010 Dietary Guidelines for Americans byincreasing quantities of fruits, vegetables, andwhole grains; establishing calorie ranges; andlimiting trans fats and sodium. Children consume almost half of their total caloriesat school, and the National School Lunch Programprovides

School lunch Program Needs To Be Changed Many students are not receiving proper meals daily, The government is wasting money on a program that was started in World War II as a measure of national security. Many children have given school lunches a bad name, media spotlights the school meals in movies and tv’s. The program was planned poorly and with little time and effort. This program has the ability to support the people of America, not hurt them.

Everyone knows that school lunch is greasy, unhealthy, and gross. Some students can not afford to bring lunch to school everyday, therefore leaving them no choice but to eat the school lunch. The schools should provide healthier, better tasting options for students to give them more energy throughout the day. I think that schools should change their lunch menu to new, healthier choices for students.

Intro Name: Natasha Torres In the nonfiction article, “ Are Our School Lunches Healthy Enough?” by McClatchy-Tribune News Service. This article is about how the first lady wants to change school lunches to be healthier for children although the school nutrition do not like her campaign. Michelle Obama’s program should be banned because the school’s lunch is already healthy enough for example, some people are grossed out by the school lunches, some are disappointed, and some say parent can not be trusted.

It was later reformed under the administration of President Barack Obama when the Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 which imposed new nutritional standards for the NSLP and other related programs (“Healthy Hunger-Free Kids Act”). However, the NSLP is seriously flawed despite its benevolent purpose. Food quality and variety are exceedingly poor in many schools across the country, and an argument could be made that it is in part due to a lack of funding to pay for stricter standards on food. Regardless of origin though, the horrendous quality of school lunches and a lack of variety alienate many children and adolescents who would otherwise participate in the NSLP and even pose some health hazards in certain cases. For this reason, regulations that govern the National School Lunch Program must be radically altered to control food grade, greater funding must be provided, and the sourcing of food must be

These school lunches are something that almost every child in the United States experiences. With the regulations in place for school lunches, they may be considered healthy, but at many times they are not considered to be delicious. Many school lunches are being thrown away by students simply because they dislike what they are forced to put on their plate. The worst part of all of it all is that the students are well aware the lunches are good for them. In short: The guidelines of a healthy school lunch should be relaxed because many schools cannot afford it, more students no

Without the proper backing and funding, schools are not able to provide not only more nutritious meals for children, but also a greater variety. Prior to the HHFKA, for breakfast, many schools offered only cold cereal and pastries (doughnuts, bagels, muffins). After the bill passed and granted the USDA more influence and control on the lunches provided, schools began to offer pancakes, oatmeal, and breakfast burritos, along with gluten free and vegan options. Many students, even if they don’t eat the lunches provided in the cafeteria, will purchase items from the students stores and vending machines during lunch breaks and meal times throughout the day. This act also allows the USDA to influence the food options provided in student stores and vending

Have you ever wondered if you could ever change the school lunches in the Public schools? Well you’re not the only one, many other people thought about changing the way you eat at lunch and started to change it. Some trials have failed but some have succeeded at the trail for their public school. But some administrators what it to come to all schools, for the fact that they are losing money because kids stopped eating lunches at school.

Is it chicken? It is probably neither, as ninety percent of meat used in school lunches is processed. In addition, students are forced eat fruits that are often tiny and bruised. Quite literally, we cannot sit down to eat unless we have a fruit or vegetable on our tray. Our healthy options are not very enticing—instead of an apple slightly bigger than a fist, shining red like a ruby, we receive a spotted excuse of a fruit.

Although changing the school lunch to a healthier, better option would be a good idea, you should not change the lunch from what it is now. Even though the kids would be eating healthier, most of the kids that eat lunch now would not buy the new lunch, also kids not buying the new lunch means not as much money comes into the school, and if you want kids to be healthier all you have to do is give them more time to be active. To begin with, if you changed the lunch at school a lot of the kids that eat lunch now would not eat lunch if you changed it. The new lunches would not taste as good as the lunches they serve now. Taking away some of the kids favorite foods is not a good idea.

Cafeteria food in schools is made to be healthy for students, but is it really healthy for students if they think it is foul and do not want to eat it? Should schools change the healthy foods to foods that students would actually want to eat? School food’s job is to be healthy and tasty to get the students through their day, but sadly school lunches tend to miss the mark on both accounts. Public schools rely on money from the government to supply food to their students, but due to several cutbacks the thing served in the cafeteria is hardly food at all. We all know the stereotypical school food mystery meat Monday or a slab of grey mush and sadly that is not too far from what it is in reality.