Gregory Johnson Case

Reasons for the majority opinion: The people who agreed thought that Schenck shouldn’t be protected by the First Amendment He is able to

This case is also regularly cited in other Supreme Court cases and is often a deciding factor. It has been used in cases like Konigsberg v. State Bar “That view, which of course cannot be reconciled with the law relating to libel, slander, misrepresentation, obscenity, perjury, false advertising, solicitation of crime, complicity by encouragement, conspiracy, and the like, is said to be compelled by the fact that the commands of the First Amendment are stated in unqualified terms: "Congress shall make no law . . . abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble . . . . " But as Mr. Justice Holmes once said: "[T]he provisions of the Constitution are not mathematical formulas having their essence in their form; they are organic living institutions transplanted from English soil.

The 1st amendment “The First Amendment guarantees freedoms concerning religion, expression, assembly, and the right to petition.” (First amendment, 1789) Which means that he has his own freedom of what to talk. Moreover, there was a case in taxes that a man called Gregory L. Johnson burned the USA flag as a way of his protesting. This time, the Supreme Court stated that “In a controversial decision, the Supreme Court, by the closest possible margin of a 5-to-4 vote, held that a person has a right to express disagreement with governmental policies by burning the American flag.”

The Results of Dred Scott v Sanford had different effects on American history. This also contributed to the start of the civil war. Dred Scott v Sanford was a court decision on if Dred Scott could sue for his freedom. " According to Supreme Court History, Dred Scott could not sue for his freedom because he was not a citizen. " This was otherwise known as an illegal case.

Eventually, In Alabama, “In 2000, a Southern independence rally at a capitol complex drew a crowd of 2,500 with many waving the battle flag and calling for the flag to be restored to the top of the dome” (Leib & Webster). Taking the flag down for good created anarchy among the proud Southerners and flag supporters in Alabama. Just like the Confederate States for succession in the late 1800’s, the Southern Independence Union gathered together to create a rally for protesting against their right to have the

Johnson went through a couple of courts before it hit the Supreme Court. It started at the Intermediate Court of Appeals after he was arrested and fined. Then it moved up to the Texas Court of Criminal Appeals because he filed for review. When it got to this point his conviction was removed and the information was ordered to be dismissed. The Judge of that Court found that his action was constitutional because it was a type of symbolic speech.

The author states on lines 37-39 "The way to preserve the flag special role is not to punish those who feed differently matter. It is to persuade them that they are wrong." Because of this we can't punish or treat others differently because of what their opinions/beliefs we can only try persuading them without offending. Second, on lines 40-43 for "American Flag Stands for Tolerance" it states "My point is that freedom of conscience and expression is at the core of ourselves conception and requires the rejection of official dogma." This demonstrates that having freedom could cause people rejection which people won't think the same and could lead to disagreements.

Therefore, the lower courts’ decisions were reversed (Ashcroft v. The Free Speech Coalition) (Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition). The following justices agreed with the CPPA: Justice Stevens, Justice Kennedy, Justice Souter, Justice Thomas, Justice Ginsburg, and Justice Breyer. There were three justices that disagreed with the CPPA: Justice O’Connor, Justice Rehnquist, and Justice Scalia (Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition). Justice O’Connor explained that the CPPA should not ban pornography using youthful-looking adults.

Texas v. Johnson’s tone is formal and serious. This tone fits the context because the Court is the people writing the document. The court does their best to not offend anyone in the document so as to get the information out without causing a riot. The American Flag Stands for Tolerance’s tone is more colloquial so as to reach the same level as the readers. The writers of The American Flag Stands for Tolerance wrote this document, using the opinions of the people so as to reach out to the readers.

Does destruction of an object qualify s free speech? Is the flag a symbol of the Ideology of the United States or merely a symbolic representation of said ideas? Personally I feel the flag stands alone, it is to be revealed and protect at all cost. As I was researching this bill I was exposed to many views. I tended to take to heart the views of those who were aligned along my own viewpoint.

The First Amendment to the United States Constitution states “Congress shall make no law…abridging the freedom of speech”. Some people in today’s time would argue the first amendment is one of the most important listed in the Bill of Rights. Many forms of speech are protected by the first amendment that one wouldn’t think would be such as flag burning and “adult videos”. Over the years there have been many different court cases that have debated and fought the forms of speech that are protected. Many people in society treat speech differently and this is given in the United States because there are such diverse groups throughout the nation.

Kenzie Mason Hooks English 9 26 January 2017 Star Spangled Banter     When the American flag is distressed and unfit for formal display, it is appropriate to dispose of it in a manner of stateliness as said in the United States Flag Code. The most frequent and fitting method to doing away with the flag is burning it. This simple statement is very broad and is easily misinterpreted. The first amendment of the United States Constitution protects this traditional way of expressing respect to the Star Spangled Banner.

Calvin Coolidge was the nation’s president at the time of the trial. The Republican was pro-business and ensured that America was operated like a business. This influenced the trial because the business side of the trial was large, due to the attention the trial received. The 19th Amendment’s passage was influential in the trial because it showed that there were more impactful opinions in the nation. The rights of free speech and opinion were heavily focused on in the women’s rights movement.

Johnson case, more and more people are taking advantage of the outcome. The results of people's actions are not just burning the flag, they are disrespecting the symbol of unity as a whole. For example, a teacher from Massey Hill Classical High School in North Carolina stepped on the flag during a freedom of speech lesson. “His goal, he said, was to teach them about how the country’s free speech protection have evolved over time” (Hawkins). There are other ways to demonstrate to children how protected their freedom of speech is.

In the United States of America, the right to freedom of expression is one of the most important rights that the citizens uphold. However, sensible citizens realize that in certain scenarios, the right to the freedom of expression must be violated in the name of the well being of the people. Unfortunately, what could harm the wellbeing of the people is a point of dissent for many members of the nation. Both sides of the argument are clearly shown today in the midst of issues like a rise in people wearing the confederate flag in places like schools; due to what the flag represents, some say the flag is considered very offensive and could cause dangerous situations. The solution these people support would be banning all confederate symbols in places like schools, but they face a strong opposition that argues banning the symbols would infringe upon the first amendment.