Against Gun Control Debate

In the 2007 National Finals of the Public Forum Debate, a competitive debate tournament in which teams are assigned sides of an issue to debate in front of a panel of judges in order to persuade them that the affirmative or negative side is correct. The topic of this debate was whether or not handguns should be banned for private use in the United States. This issue is easily debatable because of the amount of information and statistics on each side of the argument. I analyzed the affirmative team in the debate, where Thao Le and Alyssa Tharp argue their position. Le and Tharp stand resolved that private gun ownership of handguns should be banned in the United States.

Therefore, both Soudani and Grisez have persuasive reasons for or against gun control. Their opinions represent the two contradicting attitudes towards gun-control laws. One group prefers tighter restrictions on firearms selling and circulation. However, the other group views it as an infringement of their Second Amendment rights ("Gun Control"). All in all, an examination of gun-control laws, from various perspectives, reveals we should implement moderate regulations to find a common ground instead of polarizing the political and social

By reading both of these two article about guns control, I can only say the they both the authors make sense in a way, for example we take David Burnett’s, director of public relations for ‘Students for Concealed Carry on Campus (SCCC) article "Students Should Have the Right to Carry Guns on College Campuses.” In his article “Students Should Have the Right to Carry guns on College Campuses”, on the issue of banning guns on college campuses. Burnett’s strongly agrees and he defends his view in support of a student’s right to having concealed firearms with permit. Burnett uses statistics about ‘gun-free’ colleges and how being gun free doesn’t necessarily mean crime free. He uses the crime statistics from two colleges in Colorado to support this.

Academic Search Complete. Web. 22 Oct. 2015. The key aspects discussed in this article are the descriptions of how the right of open carry is not only affecting communities but also schools.

Gun Control and Societal Factors Surrounding it Gun control is a heated topic with many opinions only further complicating the matter. But one thing is clear: people are dying and nothing notable is being done about it. Schools appear to be at an elevated risk for gun violence, as troubled students have access to weapons of military caliber. If nothing gets done, our nation’s tragic history will only escalate; if something is done, however, many will insist that regulations “infringe” their rights to bear arms.

In this article they discuss the pros and cons about the gun legislation. As the article says some of the pros can be the safety of the people. Some of the cons can be that it violates or it depreives them the right of the people to bare arms. There is no potential bias as the article gives the two points of views. This article can be helpful as evidence for my argument as well as the opposing argument since it shows the two points of

A current controversial topic these days is gun control. Sources can be found all over, influencing the reader’s opinions on whether gun laws should be made stricter or

Justin Cronin’s “Confessions of a Liberal Gun Owner” is a dynamic op-ed explaining his social and political dilemma of being an armed leftist. Residing in Texas, he is not arguing to outlaw guns, but rather regulate the accessibility of guns. The author is a self-described devout democrat, but explains his reasoning and logic behind his right to bear arms. He effectively defends his use of the second amendment and the need for regulation by the use of his personal anecdotes that served as a counterargument. Cronin surrounds his argument by explaining his circumstances regarding gun ownership.

The debate around gun control in the United States is a complex issue that involves

The American citizens are the very core of the social side of the debate. The social side approaches with society and its citizens either working for or against gun control laws. In the United States we all know that laws are only enacted on through vote of the people. That is why society is such a powerful force in the gun control debate. (hardy) (cornell)

The article’s claim is that students should have the right to conceal carry on a college campus. This claim is supported by two main sub-claims within the article: gun-free zones are not necessarily safe zones, students should have the right to defend themselves, and campus carry provides safety when in place. The first sub-claim challenges the

In today’s society, one of the most alienating issues in American politics is gun control. More specifically, the issue is whether or not guns should be banned in the United States. Some people would say that guns should be banned because it would reduce crime as a whole and keep citizens safer. These people, enthusiasts of stricter gun laws, fear being safe in their country where there are so many people who have access to guns. Opponents of this argument, however, also fear losing safety.

The use of and the owning of guns is a very hot and debated topic in society today. For many, this is a life and death debate due to the recent and numerous school shootings. These school shootings have caused an outcry for more gun control, specifically in relation to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Despite these calls, increased gun control is not the answer. Most gun owners’ use their guns responsibly and for good purposes.

Gun control is a hot topic in America. Yet, we rarely hear of discussion on this issue. Throughout these articles, both authors have a good example of why gun-control should be the answer or not. The first article, Gun control isn’t the answer, the author argues, regardless, of strict gun laws in America people will still have access to guns. He states that getting rid of guns wouldn’t prevent criminals from buying illegal weapons.

Everyday in the United States, ninety families are changed forever; guns claim an average of ninety lives every day in the United States, 33,000 lives in a single year. Gun control has been a debate in the United States for many years and is constantly thrusted back into the public’s attention by horrific shootings. These shootings constantly cause individuals to petition the government to place stricter and stricter regulations of guns. However, these policies cannot be the solution to this problem. To determine a solution that will be both effective and constitutional, we must look at statistics and research that has been conducted to determine the best course of action.